• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Unity inline assembly for x64?

This topic is 4300 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I was reading the article in the DirectX SDK on porting binaries to x64 (as MS is saying that processor manufacturers will stop with 32bit chips this year...-- something I don't necessarily agree with, but understand their interest in getting devs up to speed...) Either way, was reading about this and found an interesting point or two about inline assemly. According to MS! -- Inline assembly is no longer possible when compiling for x64 platforms. MS suggests putting it into a separate file (which I have no problem with...) or avoiding it altogether, which would be nice -- but maybe infeasable for some people. So, I go and have a look about -- and I find this interview: Clicky My real thought is -- is this a big deal for people? I'm not certain about whether or not standards stipulate the necessity of having __ASM blocks capability for modern C/C++ compilers, but I don't see why MS would just ditch the possibility. Obviously, one reason they want to avoid it is so legacy apps with incompatible ASM don't break on x64 -- but is that really their (Microsoft's) job? They can't be responsible for everyone's software! ~Shiny.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I think this is more of a case of MS saying their tools are going to work a certain way rather than an 'all tools will work this way' thing.

It probably makes compiler writing easier for one thing and it shouldn't impact most people as most wont need to go to that level and I dare say most that do go via the compiler intrinstics first rather than directly to the raw assembly.

I wouldn't be shocked if 32bit chips were stopped or at least reduced down a great deal in production this year, 64bit is here now and its going to stay, the software to take advantage of it would be nice (says someone who is using a 64bit version of windows) [grin]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Original post by Shiny
but is that really their (Microsoft's) job? They can't be responsible for everyone's software!
Sadly, Microsoft really is responsible for everyone's software.

Look at it like this. So you're running XP. Vista comes out and you buy it, and now some app of importance to you no longer runs, because they relied on the behavior of a certain bug. Once that bug was fixed, the app broke. Most people's reaction is "fuck Microsoft, they broke my program". Unlike the OSS world, MS does not have the freedom to tell the application developers to fix it or go to hell. They need to preserve existing apps if at all possible -- to the point that there is a folder in Windows XP with a bunch of DLLs which are loaded when certain known-broken applications are launched. These DLLs reintroduce operating system bugs on a per-application basis in order to keep those programs chugging despite critical coding errors.

Legacy support is a painful but critical part of Microsoft's reality, and they're working very hard to change that.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Manuel Berger
      Hello fellow devs!
      Once again I started working on an 2D adventure game and right now I'm doing the character-movement/animation. I'm not a big math guy and I was happy about my solution, but soon I realized that it's flawed.
      My player has 5 walking-animations, mirrored for the left side: up, upright, right, downright, down. With the atan2 function I get the angle between player and destination. To get an index from 0 to 4, I divide PI by 5 and see how many times it goes into the player-destination angle.

      In Pseudo-Code:
      angle = atan2(destination.x - player.x, destination.y - player.y) //swapped y and x to get mirrored angle around the y axis
      index = (int) (angle / (PI / 5));
      PlayAnimation(index); //0 = up, 1 = up_right, 2 = right, 3 = down_right, 4 = down

      Besides the fact that when angle is equal to PI it produces an index of 5, this works like a charm. Or at least I thought so at first. When I tested it, I realized that the up and down animation is playing more often than the others, which is pretty logical, since they have double the angle.

      What I'm trying to achieve is something like this, but with equal angles, so that up and down has the same range as all other directions.

      I can't get my head around it. Any suggestions? Is the whole approach doomed?

      Thank you in advance for any input!
    • By devbyskc
      Hi Everyone,
      Like most here, I'm a newbie but have been dabbling with game development for a few years. I am currently working full-time overseas and learning the craft in my spare time. It's been a long but highly rewarding adventure. Much of my time has been spent working through tutorials. In all of them, as well as my own attempts at development, I used the audio files supplied by the tutorial author, or obtained from one of the numerous sites online. I am working solo, and will be for a while, so I don't want to get too wrapped up with any one skill set. Regarding audio, the files I've found and used are good for what I was doing at the time. However I would now like to try my hand at customizing the audio more. My game engine of choice is Unity and it has an audio mixer built in that I have experimented with following their tutorials. I have obtained a great book called Game Audio Development with Unity 5.x that I am working through. Half way through the book it introduces using FMOD to supplement the Unity Audio Mixer. Later in the book, the author introduces Reaper (a very popular DAW) as an external program to compose and mix music to be integrated with Unity. I did some research on DAWs and quickly became overwhelmed. Much of what I found was geared toward professional sound engineers and sound designers. I am in no way trying or even thinking about getting to that level. All I want to be able to do is take a music file, and tweak it some to get the sound I want for my game. I've played with Audacity as well, but it didn't seem to fit the bill. So that is why I am looking at a better quality DAW. Since being solo, I am also under a budget contraint. So of all the DAW software out there, I am considering Reaper or Presonus Studio One due to their pricing. My question is, is investing the time to learn about using a DAW to tweak a sound file worth it? Are there any solo developers currently using a DAW as part of their overall workflow? If so, which one? I've also come across Fabric which is a Unity plug-in that enhances the built-in audio mixer. Would that be a better alternative?
      I know this is long, and maybe I haven't communicated well in trying to be brief. But any advice from the gurus/vets would be greatly appreciated. I've leaned so much and had a lot of fun in the process. BTW, I am also a senior citizen (I cut my programming teeth back using punch cards and Structured Basic when it first came out). If anyone needs more clarification of what I am trying to accomplish please let me know.  Thanks in advance for any assistance/advice.
    • By Yosef BenSadon
      Hi , I was considering this start up http://adshir.com/, for investment and i would like a little bit of feedback on what the developers community think about the technology.
      So far what they have is a demo that runs in real time on a Tablet at over 60FPS, it runs locally on the  integrated GPU of the i7 . They have a 20 000 triangles  dinosaur that looks impressive,  better than anything i saw on a mobile device, with reflections and shadows looking very close to what they would look in the real world. They achieved this thanks to a  new algorithm of a rendering technique called Path tracing/Ray tracing, that  is very demanding and so far it is done mostly for static images.
      From what i checked around there is no real option for real time ray tracing (60 FPS on consumer devices). There was imagination technologies that were supposed to release a chip that supports real time ray tracing, but i did not found they had a product in the market or even if the technology is finished as their last demo  i found was with a PC.  The other one is OTOY with their brigade engine that is still not released and if i understand well is more a cloud solution than in hardware solution .
      Would there  be a sizable  interest in the developers community in having such a product as a plug-in for existing game engines?  How important  is Ray tracing to the  future of high end real time graphics?
    • By bryandalo
      Good day,

      I just wanted to share our casual game that is available for android.

      Description: Fight your way from the ravenous plant monster for survival through flips. The rules are simple, drag and release your phone screen. Improve your skills and show it to your friends with the games quirky ranks. Select an array of characters using the orb you acquire throughout the game.

      Download: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.HellmodeGames.FlipEscape&hl=en
    • By khawk
      Watch the latest from Unity.
  • Advertisement