Sign in to follow this  

How to get camera position?

This topic is 4208 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

How do I determine the camera position when my scene is drawn from the following Point-of-view?: glLoadIdentity(); glTranslatef(0.0f, 0.0f, -20.0f); glRotatef(+g_mouse_z, 0.0f, 0.0f, 1.0f ); glRotatef(-g_mouse_y, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f ); glRotatef(-g_mouse_x, 0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f ); Th8ks peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's the arguments to the first glTranslate, negated. In this case, the camera is at (0,0,20).

Note that, given a MODELVIEW matrix, it's impossible to tell where the camera is, and where the object is, as they've been multiplied together. However, in eye space (post-MODELVIEW), the camera is always at (0,0,0).

You might want to look at My simple camera tutorial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my own code I keep track of it, but I get the info from OpenGL. I don't remember why, precisely, but it appears to work.

    GLfloat mdl[16];
float camera_org[3];
glGetDoublev(GL_MODELVIEW_MATRIX, mdl);
camera_org[0] = -(mdl[0] * mdl[12] + mdl[1] * mdl[13] + mdl[2] * mdl[14]);
camera_org[1] = -(mdl[4] * mdl[12] + mdl[5] * mdl[13] + mdl[6] * mdl[14]);
camera_org[2] = -(mdl[8] * mdl[12] + mdl[9] * mdl[13] + mdl[10] * mdl[14]);


It appears given the modelview matrix (which is an array of 16 floating point values), the origin is the negative of each axis component scaled by the matrices corresponding translation component. Or something. I don't pretend to completely understand it, but it seems to work for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Wudan
It appears given the modelview matrix (which is an array of 16 floating point values), the origin is the negative of each axis component scaled by the matrices corresponding translation component. Or something. I don't pretend to completely understand it, but it seems to work for me.


What you got there is the collapsed form of applying the negative translation matrix to the rotation matrix (which only works if you stay away from scaling). Or the other way round. Or the transposed (in this case the same as inversed) rotation matrix. It's just been too long. Plus I'd probably apply the inverse rotation and translation in the INVERSE order to set up the view.. if I wouldn't have packed all that stuff in a camera class long ago and never touched it again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 4208 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this