Sign in to follow this  
siberianstar

OpenGL Shadow Mapping

Recommended Posts

siberianstar    134
Hello, i've read about depth-shadow mapping method to render dynamic shadows, my problem is that i don't support any OpenGL extension. How could I render a Shadow-Map without GL Extensions ? Do you have an example of how i can do it ? Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yann L    1802
Quote:

How could I render a Shadow-Map without GL Extensions ?

You can't. At least not on unextended OpenGL 1.1 (which is what you get on Windows without using extensions). Well, you could try to do it with an 8bit alpha depthmap and by abusing the alpha test for the comparison, but that will both be very slow, and very, very ugly.

What's the reason for not supporting extensions ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChaosWars    100
Why don't you want to use OpenGL extensions? It goes against the whole purpose of OpenGL :/ You can use Mesa if you don't have a good graphics card.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
siberianstar    134
I'm coding on PSP not on PC. There is an OpenGL implementation for PSP, but it doesn't have any extension for shadow mapping/pbuffers etc.. (PSP Doesn't have them).

What is mesa?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yann L    1802
Quote:
Original post by siberianstar
Do you have an example of how could i do that using the alpha test?

That's pretty easy. You first render the light's view, mapping the depth values to the alpha channel. This can be done by using a 1D range remapping alpha texture. Then copy the alpha portion of the framebuffer to an alpha texture. This is your alpha encoded depth map.

Then, when rendering from the camera point of view, apply the alpha texture using projective texturing, and the remapping 1D texture depending on the depth of each vertex as seen from the light. Then subtract the remapped depth alpha from the depth texture alpha. Finally, use the alpha test to differentiate between shadowed and lit regions (by comparing to zero).

This technique is very inefficient though, especially if you don't have support for multitexturing. It's also not very precise, due to the limited range of an 8bit alpha buffer (eventhough the remapping 1D texture will increase precision on a well selected near/far range). You'll get a lot of shadowing artifacts, compared to a modern 24/32 bit depth texture.

If you're interested, this paper describes the technique in detail (see chapter 2.1).

Mesa is a full featured software OpenGL implementation. However, it is very slow compared to hardware support. It will probably not even run on a PSP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
    • By markshaw001
      Hi i am new to this forum  i wanted to ask for help from all of you i want to generate real time terrain using a 32 bit heightmap i am good at c++ and have started learning Opengl as i am very interested in making landscapes in opengl i have looked around the internet for help about this topic but i am not getting the hang of the concepts and what they are doing can some here suggests me some good resources for making terrain engine please for example like tutorials,books etc so that i can understand the whole concept of terrain generation.
       
  • Popular Now