Detected memory leaks!
Dumping objects ->
{760} normal block at 0x009E9D68, 4 bytes long.
Data: < > F8 8A 9E 00
{759} normal block at 0x009E8F28, 24 bytes long.
Data: <h > 68 9D 9E 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Object dump complete.
Angelscript 2.7.0 leaks?
Author
I've been playing around with AS a bit and I seem to get a memory leak. I'm using "crtdbg.h" to detect the leak. I have checked that the scriptengine object is released properly and that no other part of my code is causing it. I don't know if AS uses some kind of singleton that might cause a false memory leak?
Thanks for a great and easy-to-use scripting language.
Author
It seems there is some object that is not released properly when building, I.E. engine->Build(module).
Call stack:
Call stack:
> Game.exe!asCArray<unsigned long *>::Allocate(unsigned int numElements=3435973836, bool keepData=true) Line 156 + 0x19 bytes Game.exe!asPushActiveContext(asIScriptContext * ctx=0x009e8af8) Line 118 + 0xa bytes Game.exe!asCContext::Execute() Line 805 + 0x9 bytes Game.exe!asCModule::CallInit() Line 157 + 0xf bytes Game.exe!asCModule::Build() Line 128
I use crtdbg.h to detect memory leaks in all my tests, and I'm not aware of any leaks at all.
Can you show me a small sample that reproduces the memory leak so that I can debug it and fix the leak?
Can you show me a small sample that reproduces the memory leak so that I can debug it and fix the leak?
Author
Quote:Original post by WitchLord
I use crtdbg.h to detect memory leaks in all my tests, and I'm not aware of any leaks at all.
Can you show me a small sample that reproduces the memory leak so that I can debug it and fix the leak?
This code is kinda baked into my engine. But I think you can make out how it goes.
void print(int value){ char s[32]; _itoa_s(value, s, 10); Core::getInstance().getLogger().writeDebug(s);}as = asCreateScriptEngine(ANGELSCRIPT_VERSION);std::ifstream file(filename);std::string fileString = std::string(std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(file), std::istreambuf_iterator<char>());file.close();as->AddScriptSection(module, section, fileString.c_str(), fileString.length());as->RegisterGlobalFunction("void print(int)", asFUNCTION(print), asCALL_CDECL);as->Build(module);as->ExecuteString(module, "void doSomething()");as->Release();
Author
Sorry for the late reply, mate. No, I don't think it matters what the script looks like. I'm using the following:
void doSomething(){ int apa = 123; print(apa); print(523);}
Hi, Did you tried to use _CrtSetBreakAlloc() to break on the code who made allocation responsible for the leak ?
In your case, you could try :
_CrtSetBreakAlloc( 759 );
_CrtSetBreakAlloc( 760 );
Regards,
Lbas
In your case, you could try :
_CrtSetBreakAlloc( 759 );
_CrtSetBreakAlloc( 760 );
Regards,
Lbas
Author
Quote:Original post by NotAYakk
Can you generate a leak twice as large?
Doesn't seem like it. I still get two leaks, even if I create two asIScriptEngine and then release them.
Quote:Original post by Lbas
Hi, Did you tried to use _CrtSetBreakAlloc() to break on the code who made allocation responsible for the leak ?
In your case, you could try :
_CrtSetBreakAlloc( 759 );
_CrtSetBreakAlloc( 760 );
Regards,
Lbas
Yup, check for the callstack in a previous reply here.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
