• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Cross-platform?

This topic is 4122 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm developing a physics simulation with OpenGL and Glut on WindowsXP using MSVC++ 2005 Express. (Although, I'm open to using other compilers.) My main concern is that I want people running linux and Mac OS X to be able to run my code as well without having to compile it themselves. What is the best way going about this. I'm guessing I'd have to use some sort of makefile. However, I've never done this. The people that I'm going to be distributing my program to aren't technically savvy when it comes to programming. At the most, I can expect them to type ./make install. But really, I'd rather have a precomiled version already there for them. Being that I only have access to Win32, what would be the best way to either compile a cross-platform binary, or to offer a make file that's cross platform. (I'm not sure I even know what I'm talking about :)) Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
One very common library is GLUT which would allow you to write portable code and have simple keyboard and mouse input. There are other libraries out there but I've only used GLUT. An alternative is to separate out your OS (non-portable) code from your OpenGL (portable) code and manually convert the OS code between systems. I suggest this only because you gain more flexibility if you need it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could have separate makefiles;

Makefile.OSX
Makefile.LINUX
Makefile.Win32

You could use something like ClanLib or SDL for cross platform APIs.

You can get the GNU compiler/linker for all three platforms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
Right on the front page there's a kjam article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there are three ways you can achieve your goal:

either you distribute to the users so they have to compile it themselves. while this is not the most comfortable way for the users, it is quite simple to do for you as the distributor.
to make compilation as easy as possible on unixoid platforms, for example linux and osx, the "make" tool is the most common way to go. writing the required makefiles yourself can be hell, so there are tools that make things easier.
they are called the "autotools", because their names, like "autoconf", "autoscan", "automake" and so on start with "auto". well, these are actually unix programs themselves, so you need to set up some kind of emulation to run them under windows. there is a combination of packages i would recommend:
MinGW, which contains the GCC compilers for windows
MSYS, which contains more unix tools, like "make", which is crucial for the makefile approach, and finally
MSYS DTK, the MSYS Developer Toolkit, which contains the autotools and some more programs.

there are some tutorials on the net about the gnu autotools. here is a link to gnu's webpage for autoconf with some links to the other tools involved in the build process. you could try to google for some beginner tutorials.

nevertheless, i still do not like using the make system since it so compilcated that it would be of no use for me to learn, at least at the moment. (i'd be happy to hear some recommendations on alternatives to make and the autotools)


the other approach is to compile your code to binaries for the target platforms. this is called "cross compiling". i haven't used this technique myself, so i cannot give you advice on this. nevertheless, asking google might help. if i remember correctly you can use gcc to cross compile to linux, but i'm not sure if the gcc binary included in MinGW is able to do it. maybe you need to compile gcc yourself, which may get hard since you will have some trouble with the required libraries and headers, since gcc is natively built for linux and unix.

option number three, which is only applyable to a linux target, would be to download and burn a so-called linux "live cd". this enables you to boot linux directly from cd without the danger of your harddrive or it's data being damaged. so, now you could compile the source under linux natively. nevertheless you need either some kind of network share to copy the resulting binary to or you have to write on your harddisk, which could be a problem if it is formatted with NTFS instead of FAT since the writing drivers for NTFS sometimes crash, which could lead to data loss. Knoppix is such a live cd distribution, although i do not know for sure if there is a compiler included, but i guess so. just have a look at the page, maybe it's mentioned there.

good luck, whatever you decide to do :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
Check out SDL -- http://www.libsdl.org

Very popular with commercial developers targetting linux, osx and windows. Has ports to many other platforms.

Very easy to work with, and handles crossplatform input and GL init for you.

It of course does a bunch of 2D and sound options too, but you don't have to use those if you don't want to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks guys.

I'm a student employee in the IT department at the university I attend. We mainly have PC's, but we have a few labs with Macs (No intel processors though :()

Also, I can go the live CD route for linux as mentioned, or I'll just install it on an older computer of mine.

I had always put off SDL because I had thought the support for 3D graphics was very limited. But I seem to be wrong. I like it's feature set and the api seems straight forward, so I'll give it a try.

So, I'll be using SDL + g++ on windows. Then, I'll talk my boss into letting me develop on one of the school macs. And getting linux setup on one of my computers isn't a problem. I just hope my code is truly portable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement