• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Latest OpenGL libs and headers for ATI?

This topic is 4118 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Where do I find the latest OpenGL headers and libs from ATI? I downloaded the SDK but couldn't find them. Can you tell me where they are? Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
You have them already in your compiler. OpenGL header are not changed for a long time(last change as i am aware of is 1996 and this was OpenGL 1.1), cause the new functionality comes through extensions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Red_falcon
You have them already in your compiler. OpenGL header are not changed for a long time(last change as i am aware of is 1996 and this was OpenGL 1.1)

Actually OpenGL has changed a lot, but the Windows implementation has not changed since 1996.

Quote:
Original post by Red_falcon
cause the new functionality comes through extensions.

Well, ideally, we would have an updated Windows implementation, so the extensions would only be for bleeding-edge or implementation-specific things, but ah well.

You can find out more about extensions in this article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fact is, I need libraries that already include the OpenGL 2.0 command set. The ones I am currently using are from the Visual Net. 2003 C++ Compiler which only seems to include the libs for OpenGL 1.5 . Strangely enough, the headers already include the function heads, but I get lots of linker errors naturally.


Do I have any other chance to solve this problem beside the extension mechanism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@Desperado: Which functions do you want to use?

@Simian Man: Yeah, that's what i meant. Hopefully GL3 will be more a complete kernel than a whole bunch of extensions. PS: It's funny for a russian like me to see the name of the city where you live in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can foresee the future[grin]. I thought already as i wrote the question that you will ask for shader support. There are 2 ways you bind it manually or use an extension lib like glew or glee. For the manual way look on gamedev for article "Moving beyond Windows 1.1"(i hope its the right title).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Windows really needs a free OpenGL implementation, fgs.


You haven't got the meaning of !!!Open!!!-GL, or??[lol]

To add to my previous the errors appear cause the entry points must be specified. That's the reason to bind it manually or the best method with a library.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It does not depend on MS. The most GL headers are old, but wgl and glext headers are updated constantly(as i know). And the most important part is the graphics card driver, which define new extensions along with their entry ponints etc. Don't let it bother you, as i said previously, i hope that GL3 will become a more complete thing and not a loose bunch. ATM i use glew for extensions and have no problems anymore with this whole pointer hassle for right entry point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even if you can get up to date headers, this still leaves the libs. And MS hasn't updated them since 1.1 or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The way the system works means that only MS can update the opengl32.dll, which is a good thing as it's a system dll and you don't really want that being mucked around with.

The opengl32.dll gives you the basic hooks required to make OpenGL go in it's current form, it's automagically loaded by the OS when you try to initalise an OGL context. It then hooks into the MCD/ICD provided by the driver manufacture, which is pretty much what you talk directly to when you get a hardware context.

MS have no intrest in, and indeed with the existance of extension loading libraries no need to, update the lib/dll/h combo. For one thing it would cost them money to develop the software renderer and I guess they have done the research and decided that the cost wasn't worth the gain.

End of the day, forget MS, they are not your friend in the OGL world and you are better off getting a library todo the work.

There are plans afoot for OGL to develop a complete SDK and hopefully with that will come updated headers etc... but thats in the future [smile]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is it possible to write a lib which references all the OGL Extensions for you, so that all you need to do just #include the library and let it do all the hard work for you so that you can use glCreateShader() etc without having to work on it?

Or would this not be hardware-independant. I know there would have to be different libraries for Windows and Linux.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Is it possible to write a lib which references all the OGL Extensions for you, so that all you need to do just #include the library and let it do all the hard work for you so that you can use glCreateShader() etc without having to work on it?

Or would this not be hardware-independant. I know there would have to be different libraries for Windows and Linux.


Look at my previous posts. I named already GLEW and GLEE libs as example which are doing exactly what you are asking for. Just choose one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement