Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Antialiased fonts

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a method for drawing antialiased fonts in OpenGL. In my application I have to be able to draw all installed fonts in a correct form and antialiased if possible. The result should be something like MS Word can do. Outline fonts could be good if there were any useable method for antialiasing, otherwise they look very awful at a little size. I also tried Freetype, but I couldn't manage to get it support character-sets like Eastern-European. Is there any other way?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
The Windows wgl has some functions for drawing text. However, they do not draw antialiased text at all (as far as I know). You will have to write your own font renderer or use a readily available one.

Nehe's tutorial #43 is about rendering anti-aliased bitmap fonts using FreeType, so if you want to roll your own, it's a good resource to get started. The FreeType manuals are also worth reading (although they are a bit out of date and somewhat incomplete).

There's a couple of FreeType font renderers available. There's GLTT and FTGL and GLttf ( GLttf is written by me ;). You could pick one of those and use it to render text.

What comes to non-standard character-sets and FreeType, FreeType does support a bunch of different character encodings. If you are using character encodings that aren't supported by FreeType, you'll have to translate your characters into an encoding understood by FreeType. GLttf works with unicode and I can render my scandinavian characters, euro signs, copyright symbols and other non-ascii characters ok. Using unicode for your strings isn't really a bad idea.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thx for your help!

Well, I have two main problems with libraries based on FreeType. First of all, I can't tell you exactly why, but I'm a little bit afraid of the fact that they are bitmap-based. As far as I know FreeType generates an 8bpp texture for all characters, but what happens, when I have to zoom them for example. My solution has to be insensible of that. So that's why I prefer outline fonts.

The other thing is, and that's the bigger problem, that, OK, even if I manage to handle Eastern-European character set, the application is multilangual, so it has to be able to display any existing font-type (Russian, Korean as well) without any special and custom development. And yes, the wgl functions can handle them but in that case antialiasing is still an existing problem.

I think my problem is so special that I have to find my own way to solve it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now