Sign in to follow this  
lserlohn

OpenGL how to init OpenGL in a none-windowed program?

Recommended Posts

lserlohn    122
how to init OpenGL in a none-windowed program? I want to make a OpenGL program without a window, that is Rendering off screen and exporting to a bmp file. But I don't know how to init OpenGL in this none-windowed program. In a windowed program,there are always using CreateWindowEx() to create a window and then get back the HWND, and then : hDC = GetDC(HWND); hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC); But in my program ,there isn't any window,so how do I get the HWND hDC and hRC? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DaBono    1496
Haven't done this, but I guess you could try to create a memoryDC using CreateCompatibleDC, create a bitmap, call SelectObject to bind the DC to the bitmap and then use that DC to call wglCreateContext.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beco    162
Yes, you have to create Rendering Context with an own pixelformat with PFD_DRAW_TO_BITMAP flag. Then create a compatible DC and a bitmap and select it for the DC. Then you can render your scene directly to the memory. Maybe you have to know that it won't use any hardware acceleration, it will be done by CPU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lserlohn    122
Thanks, but this job is too costly, I really need hardware accelerate.

Is there a way to use hardware accelerate without creating a window?

or Is there any better idea? I want to "pack" the openGL program into a COM object.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DaBono    1496
Would it be OK for your program to use a hidden window? So, create a window as usual, but never call ShowWindow on it? Then, use glReadPixels to read from the frame buffer and write that to a file.
(Again, I'm just guessing if this would work..)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GKW    200
I did this a while ago and I don't totally remember what I did but from what I recall you definitely had to create a window and I think you had to realize it. After that you could hide it with no worries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Krohm    5030
Quote:
Original post by GKW
I did this a while ago and I don't totally remember what I did but from what I recall you definitely had to create a window and I think you had to realize it. After that you could hide it with no worries.

This seems familiar also to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now