Sign in to follow this  
abolfoooud

OpenGL Backwards Projection

Recommended Posts

Dear experts, I would like to do back-projection from screen coords to 3D OpenGL coords. Suppoze i have pixel (sx, sy) on screen and i want to get its actual position in the 3D space of OGL (gx, gy, gz). How can I do that espicially that i will move from 2D to 3D? Regards Abolfoooud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanx for the reply.

What is Depth exactly?

And how can i achieve this back-projection manually, ie i want to do the calculations myself (the dirty way using matrises :D). Don want to use API functions!!!

Not that i am using glfrustum() not gluperspective()

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Because one dimension is lost in the process of projection, there is no simple way of reverting the transformation by an inverse projection matrix or such. The general approach then, is to shoot a ray in that direction and test for intersections. The first object that intersects this ray will give the depth. I wrote a detailed description of the process a while back, you can find that here:
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=421237

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankx Ashkan.
That is really a good work!!
Just have some questions regarding these points in your reply:

Now Devide by:
proj[0] = proj(0, 0) -> Projection transformation scaling multiplyer in x direction
proj[5] = proj(1, 1) -> Projection transformation scaling multiplyer in y direction

And the result is x and y in homogenous clip space.

float x = normX / proj[0];
float y = normY / proj[5];

what do you mean by proj[0] = proj(0, 0) and proj[5] = proj(1, 1)?? I did not get is? Are you recalculating it using some function not shown in your description???

Also in:

Vector4 rayDirection( x, y, -1.0f, 0.0f );

why do you use -1.0f for z? Do you have to use -ZNearHeight instead of -1 if you are using gluperspective??

best
Abolfoooud

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
what do you mean by proj[0] = proj(0, 0) and proj[5] = proj(1, 1)?? I did not get is? Are you recalculating it using some function not shown in your description???


No, proj[0] is just the array representation of the element located at the zeroth row and zeroth column. Same goes for proj[5], its just the array cell containing the element located at the first row and column. Remember that OpenGL, contrary to Direct3D, uses column major matrices. I used this array representation to follow the OpenGL notation where matrices are represented as column major arrays. A better way of writing that to help avoid such confusion is:

proj[0] == proj(0, 0)
proj[1] == proj(1, 1)


In case you're wondering what a perspective projection matrix (and consequently its (0, 0) and (1, 1) elements) look like check the 31st slide of the following powerpoint presentaion. Its also a good intro on the subject:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/graphics/Courses/559-f2004/lectures/cs559-11.ppt

*Off topic*: You may also find these other presentations useful:
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/graphics/Courses/559-f2004/lectures/

Quote:
why do you use -1.0f for z? Do you have to use -ZNearHeight instead of -1 if you are using gluperspective??


OpenGL, again contrary to Direct3D, places the clipping planes down the negative Z axis so the view volume that is formed is totally placed on the negative side of the XY plane. Maybe this decision was partly because OpenGL's use of a right handed coordinate system. As a side effect zNear > zFar, because we are looking down the negative Z axis at this volume of space. Our common sense says that the near value should be a lower number than the far and that's exactly why all those functions (gluPerspective, glFrustum and glOrtho) accept positive values and internally negate them.

If you're interested in the mathematics behind the pipeline, "3D Computer Graphics" by Alan Watt is a great book to look into.

Hope that helps,
Ashkan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627752
    • Total Posts
      2978926
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now