• Advertisement

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OpenGL OpenGL: How to detach frame rate form refresh rate

This topic is 6177 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Do anyone know how to detach frame rate form refresh rate??....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
this is os specific
in windows u can disable it in the display properties tab, also theres an extension win_swap_interval (see my site for a demo)

http://members.xoom.com/myBollux

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It''s all about windows... Which example do you speak about?

please helpme a bit more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bottom of page click on "opengl extensions" then click "win swap interval"

http://members.xoom.com/myBollux

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you are referring to the fact that when you use fullscreen exclusive mode that the speed of you rendering matches the speed of your refresh rate. The reason is simple. It is because of the surface option to wait for the verticle refresh before flipping the back buffer to the primary buffer. If you were to ignore this, your program would traverse though your code at full speed without stopping, but you would get a nasty flashing glitches in your graphics (fine for testing). To wait for your verticle refresh is to bring your main graphics rendering loop to a screeching halt until your refesh has flipped the surface. It is okay however, since when the flipping is done, your code blasts through the loop until it gets back to the flip surface routine again. The only way to have code run constantly without stopping for the flip is to run a separate thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually I''ve noticed a number of things when running Win2k vs. WinMe.

In Win2k, when i run my demo in full screen mode, the FPS value cannot pass the refresh rate. However, running it in windowed mode, it does.

This problem does not occur under WinMe.
Also, i noticed the FPS is lower in fullscreen compared to windowed when running under Win2K. Again this problem does not occur in WinMe.

-Xtreme.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry but I have had this problem for a long time and i think it is related to the same issue. I notice in my games, there are set frame rates i can get. eg normally i get a frame rate of ~72, but there is a certain point beyond which adding 1 more poly causes frame rate to drops to 35, then again 24 and... I heard that this has to do with refresh rate or something. Could anyone explain to me why and what this is? is there a way to force a more gradual drop in framerate? Oh and i have noticed that this kindda doesn''t happen in Quake 3.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With VSync on you will only get factors of the refresh rate. With a 60Hz refresh rate, you will only get 60FPS, 30FPS, 15FPS and so on. You can''t get a more gradual drop unless you turn VSync off which is undesirable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Xtreme
In Win2k, when i run my demo in full screen mode, the FPS value cannot pass the refresh rate. However, running it in windowed mode, it does.



Strange, I can run games in full screen with vsync disabled and get a higher fps than my refresh rate. Running Win2k pro w/ a 32meg geforce sdr, leaked 10.80 drivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As was said in the previous post, I get higher numbers than my refresh rate in fullscreen in Win2K as well. Oh, and while I''m on this topic, I read a review about WinME vs. Win2K''s game performance, and Win2K was faster for almost every game except UT .

"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual referred to a "pointer to void." --Things People Said
Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!
http://www.gdarchive.net/druidgames/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Put simply, the Unreal engine has problems. The software renderer effects the hardware renderer which causes some of the slowdowns in D3D and OGL. 3DRealms removed the software renderer from Duke Forever, and sped up the hardware renderer by doing so. Sure hope DNF does get released eventually, I soooo want that game! Even more so than the new Doom at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My reply to all these topics questions and so on:

First i have worked with DirectDraw.. There it''s very simple to detach the framerate from the refresh rate.. You only set in the flip functio some code like this DDFLIP_NOVSYNC

and it works fine.. I get framerates above 1000 fps ) but you have some tearing effects...

So in opengl i think there is an option to do this also. First I somtime plays quake it''s OpenGL and it has a function in it to do this.

So I want to know that code )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
and this works in all windows versions! also in win2k and win me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
I''m not really saying anything new here...

wglSwapInterval is your answer. wglSwapInterval(0) disables retrace synchronization and wglSwapInterval(1) enables it. Whatever you decide to use, wglSwapInterval _should_ override any driver settings, but don''t necessarily expect it to.

OpenGL was intended to be hardware-independent so things like retrace synchroniziation are handled by the OS, so don''t expect to have OpenGL do it. OpenGL is just for drawing stuff, not managing frame buffers or anything like that.

Personally, I''d rather use a hardware-indepentent API like OpenGL and not have to worry about setting up structures and querying stuff to the point that I have 20 pages of code before I can even draw something like with Direct3D. I may be wrong on this, but if anyone says that DirectX 8 eliminates that, I should point out that Microsoft just wrapped the old stuff in the same way that the OpenGL utility library does, and that''s something that''s existed in OpenGL long before Direct3D ever existed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t see a mention of wglSwapInterval anywhere on MSDN!
Is this hardware dependent?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MSDN is not very uptodate with opengl. have a look at www.opengl.org or my site under gl extensions

http://members.xoom.com/myBollux

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t want to sound dumb, but hey this place is for help right?

Is retrace synchronization is the same as vertical sync?

-Will

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, the politically correct term is "verticle retrace" but there are numerous other terms, e.g. "refresh rate". It seems like we have been repeating ourselves a lot, so here is how it works. The Cathode Ray Tube (Monitor) has to draw one line at a time usually in a top-to-bottom motion. It is going fast enough that the human eye detects it as one steady image. But if you notice, the lower the refresh rate, the more flashy and blurry your image gets (tough on the eyes). It is recommened to run in refresh rates of 75hz or higher.

The reason you get "tearing" is because, if you decide NOT to wait for the refresh to finish drawing and start at the top, the image you place in your primary buffer instantly goes to the screen, even if the monitor isn''t done drawing the first frame, so you get part of one image at the top of the screen and part of another image at the bottom (ugly).

When you tell your code to wait for "verticle syncing", you are waiting for the frame in your primary buffer to be completely drawn to the screen and the CRT to move back up to the top of the screen to start drawing the next frame. It is at this point, the backbuffer is flipped to the primary buffer, the CRT begins drawing. and you code is free to put more data in the back buffer. Your CPU is much faster than your monitor, so it gets done doing everything, long before the monitor has finished drawing the last bit of data you flipped to the primary buffer. So when you code gets back to the flip function. It waits again until it has permission to flip the buffers. Repeated a million times or so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Refresh rate is NOT the same as Vertical retrace. The refresh rate is, basically, what it says - the rate at which the vertical retrace occurs. This of course is assuming you are talking about the vertical refresh rate. The vertical retrace is the actual event where the electron gun is repositioning itself back at the top of the frame.
Vertical sync is a term used to denote that you are in synchronisation with the vertical retrace, that is you wait for the vertical retrace before doing the flip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement