class Foo {
public:
void func();
};
class Bar {
private:
Foo *foo;
public:
Bar(Foo *f) : foo(f) { }
~Bar() { foo->func(); }
};
void hoge()
{
Foo f;
Bar b(&f);
}
order of destruction of objects on the stack
Author
Hello all,
Are objects declared on the stack *guaranteed* to be destroyed in the reverse order that they are declared?
For example, if I have the following classes:
And the following function:
Is this dangerous? Is there any possibility that 'f' will be destroyed before 'b'?
Quote:Original post by bpoint
Are objects declared on the stack *guaranteed* to be destroyed in the reverse order that they are declared?
Yes. Also, class member variables and base class subobjects are guaranteed to be destroyed in the reverse order that they were created.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
