Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Detecting if-in-VSync

This topic is 3903 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anybody can help me, but I am having an unusual "slug" in my game using Mingw & SDL w/ OpenGL. Basically what happens is that at various seemingly chaotic times, the time it takes to render a frame will jump horribly from like it's normal 10-20 milliseconds on my (crappy) computer up to like 50 milliseconds and as a result (since in order to maintain 60fps, you must complete your logic and rendering within ~16 milliseconds each frame, 1000/60=16.) the whole game bogs down. This usually happens when there are a large number of objects on the screen or if you try to start a big war with a lot of people shooting at a lot of other people. However although it occurs frequently it does not occur reliably every time you do this. The specifics of this bug are complex and somewhat irrevalent because I already am pretty sure I know what the problem is, but I will explain a little bit more background before I get to my question so you can understand better. If you don't like reading long stuff just skip down to the bottom where I ask the question. I know that it is not just bogging down because there is a lot of stuff going on. Here are the reasons I know that, and some interestingly relavent points: 1) Lots of times, I can render just as many objects as I am rendering when it bogs down, and there is only marginal increase in render time. 2) My "logic time", the game logic, is fully decoupled from the "blit time", the renderer, it is as if they run in seperate threads, the logic running at a constant 100 fps and the renderer taking a "snapshot" whenever it can afford to (they do not literally run in seperate threads but it is programmed such that it is the same conceptually). My logic time does not increase significantly during the bog down. Therefore it is definetely the rendering which is slowing things down and not my game logic. 3) *MOST OF ALL*, once it is bogged down, it has a tendency to stay bogged down, even if I stop the war and everybody just sits there on the screen motionless executing no logic--THIS IS THE EXACT SAME SCENE as I could previously render in 10ms, yet after this bug has occurred it takes upwards of 50ms to render. 4) If it is bogged down and I push a debug key which disables the rendering, then push it again to turn rendering back on, it is no longer bogged down for a few seconds, then it bogs down again. 5) PERHAPS MOST IMPORTANTLY OF ALL I have, up till I got around to looking into this, had my renderer capped so that it would not blit faster than 20fps. The reason is very interesting--if I blit no faster than ~20fps, it takes about 10ms to render each frame. But if I let it blit too much faster than that, even though I have about 50% of my CPU time left over just sitting there getting burned off, it takes longer and longer to render the frames, and if I let it blit anytime it can, it takes a incredibly sluggish 50ms and bogs everything down. Now point number 5 makes no sense. The higher a frame rate you have, the more CPU speed you have to have. However each frame should take the same amount of time to render whether you are rendering at 100fps or 10fps. It requires more speed only because you are rendering 10 times as many per second. The solution What I think is happening is that when I call SDL_GL_SwapBuffers, it is waiting until v-sync before it blits the frame. What this means is that if you only blit frames at like 20fps, then the total amount of time wasted per second inside GL_SwapBuffers is small and not noticable. However, if instead you try to push frames out as fast as possible, then even if your computer can render 300 fps, each frame will block until the next vsync, and so you are burning off much more time blocked inside SwapBuffers, and so the framerate you can support becomes lower. This theory is supported by the fact that my measurements indicate that calling the renderer alone with no game logic as fast as possible, it takes longer to render each frame than calling the renderer 20 times per second. However if SDL_GL_SwapBuffers is commented out, it makes no difference how often you call it on the time the function takes to complete. And now to the real question So when my game happens to go over 16 ms for a few frames in a row, the block-until-vsync caused by SDL_GL_SwapBuffers means it starts taking longer to render each frame. This causes it to bog down more, and more, and more, and stay stuck that way even after whatever originally caused the brief lag is gone. What I want to do is: * Call some function which will return whether or not I am in v-sync. That way I can still start my renders in v-sync to avoid tearing, but I will have control over the wait state and so my entire program will not be suspended-- I can be cleverer and only try to swap the buffers when I know there will be no waiting. * Preferably, I would also like to disable SDL's/OpenGL's blocking until v-sync entirely, and just depend on my own logic to only blit when it's a good time. I am NOT running this application fullscreen. I am running it in a window. I know for a fact that when it is fullscreen I am stuck at 60fps. However it appears to be still syncing to something, although at about 110fps, while in a window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
under windows

The current swap interval for the window
associated with the current context can be obtained by calling
wglGetSwapIntervalEXT

the same function can be used to set the swap interval

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I know about that function but it does not help because all it does is tell you whether vertical syncing is enabled or not. It does not tell you whether your card is currently in a vsync cycle. Therefore you have no way of timing your buffer swaps to sync up with the vsync and so much valuble time gets wasted while opengl suspends your program waiting for vsync. Moreover, my computer does not even have the wgl extensions so they do not work for me anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 3903 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now