# OpenGL Rubberband selection?

## Recommended Posts

I have a OpenGL routine that renders a rubberband rectangle, while I drag the cursor: glEnable(GL_COLOR_LOGIC_OP); glLogicOp(GL_XOR); However, the problem with this, is that I don't want the color of the background to be XORed: glClearColor( background.r, background.g, background.b ); So, how would I draw a rubberband rectangle while ignoring (err...preserving) the color of the background? I only want the foreground elements to be XORed. [Edited by - JakeM on July 10, 2007 6:58:12 PM]

##### Share on other sites
If you want per pixel control over what is XORed or not, look into a per pixel rasterization decision mechanism. For example, depth test or stencil buffer.

Using the stencil buffer, set the stencil clear value to zero and stencil function to write one where you draw an object. When drawing the rectangle, draw it first without XOR where the stencil test succeeds agains zero, and then draw it with XOR where the stencil test succeeds against one.

Depth buffer can be used in a similar way. If you clear the depth buffer with 1.0, draw without XOR where the depth is equal to 1.0. That means you have to draw the rectangle on the far clipping plane so fragments are rasterized with maximum depth value. Then draw with XOR and depth test seto to not equal, or less, or something else that passes for anything not 1.0.

##### Share on other sites
Thanks,
Using the depth buffer is probably best way for me.

Are you saying the pixels drawn by glClearColor() can be depth tested
or when I'm drawing the foreground elements?

Rendering each frame is usually set to this:
glClearDepth(1.0f);
glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST);
glDepthFunc(GL_LEQUAL);

How would this change when drawing the foreground elements?
And then it would change again when drawing the rubberband rectangle?

Not quite sure I understand when drawing the rectangle, since these all of
these pixels will always be drawn.

##### Share on other sites
If you clear the buffers, you have a framebuffer filled with color specified by glClearColor and depth specified by glClearDepth (1.0 by default). If you draw anything, somewhere, the depth buffer is changed. If, after drawing everything, the depth buffer contains 1.0, it must be the background, becuase you haven't drawn anything there.

##### Share on other sites
is there a way to doing same means rubberband drawing in directx

## Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

## Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

• ## Partner Spotlight

• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
627682
• Total Posts
2978614
• ### Similar Content

• Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using glMapBuffer(), which works fine.
But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using glMapBufferRange(), which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
• By xhcao
Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness.
• By cebugdev
hi guys,
are there any books, link online or any other resources that discusses on how to build special effects such as magic, lightning, etc. in OpenGL? i mean, yeah most of them are using particles but im looking for resources specifically on how to manipulate the particles to look like an effect that can be use for games,. i did fire particle before, and I want to learn how to do the other 'magic' as well.
Like are there one book or link(cant find in google) that atleast featured how to make different particle effects in OpenGL (or DirectX)? If there is no one stop shop for it, maybe ill just look for some tips on how to make a particle engine that is flexible enough to enable me to design different effects/magic
let me know if you guys have recommendations.
Thank you in advance!
• By dud3
How do we rotate the camera around x axis 360 degrees, without having the strange effect as in my video below?
Mine behaves exactly the same way spherical coordinates would, I'm using euler angles.
Tried googling, but couldn't find a proper answer, guessing I don't know what exactly to google for, googled 'rotate 360 around x axis', got no proper answers.

References:
Code: https://pastebin.com/Hcshj3FQ
The video shows the difference between blender and my rotation:

• By Defend
I've had a Google around for this but haven't yet found some solid advice. There is a lot of "it depends", but I'm not sure on what.
My question is what's a good rule of thumb to follow when it comes to creating/using VBOs & VAOs? As in, when should I use multiple or when should I not? My understanding so far is that if I need a new VBO, then I need a new VAO. So when it comes to rendering multiple objects I can either:
* make lots of VAO/VBO pairs and flip through them to render different objects, or
* make one big VBO and jump around its memory to render different objects.
I also understand that if I need to render objects with different vertex attributes, then a new VAO is necessary in this case.
If that "it depends" really is quite variable, what's best for a beginner with OpenGL, assuming that better approaches can be learnt later with better understanding?

• 13
• 12
• 10
• 12
• 22