Sign in to follow this  
Ezbez

OpenGL [PyOpenGL] Textures stop working when I use glGenTextures()

Recommended Posts

I have a pretty solid background of OpenGL in C++, but I'm not nearly as used to it in Python. I'm using PyOpenGL as the binding. I'm also using PyGame. My problem is odd in that it doesn't work when I do things 'correctly', and mostly works when I make a blatant mistake! When I started this program, I accidentally forgot to call glGenTextures(1) and just initialized my texture to 0. Since I only had one textured object to begin with, it worked fine. The texture loaded, displayed, blended, etc. properly. Then I added a second textured object and noticed my mistake since they were both given the same texture. I corrected by mistake, but now no textures work. The quads simply come up as white rectangles, as if they hadn't been textured at all. Now I know that loading, binding, etc. worked just fine since it worked when I didn't call glGenTextures(), so that has left me with just one place where it's gone wrong, the actual call to glGenTextures! But how could I have messed that up? Check out my Sprite class below.
class Sprite:
    def __init__(self, x,y, w,h, fileName):
        self.x = x
        self.y = y
        self.w = w
        self.h = h

        self.fileName = fileName

        glEnable(GL_TEXTURE_2D)
        
        #load in the file
        self.img = pygame.image.load(fileName)
        texData = pygame.image.tostring(self.img, "RGBA", 1)
        
        #Bind it to a texture
        self.texture = glGenTextures(1)
        glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, self.texture)
        width = self.img.get_width()
        height = self.img.get_height()
        glTexImage2D( GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, width, height, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, texData )

    def Draw(self):
        glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, self.texture)

        glPushMatrix()
        
        glTranslatef(self.x, self.y, 0.0)


        glColor3f(1.0,1.0,1.0)
        glEnable(GL_TEXTURE_2D)
        
        glBegin(GL_QUADS)

        w = self.w / 2.0
        h = self.h / 2.0

        glTexCoord2i(0,1)
        glVertex3f(-w,h,0.0)

        glTexCoord2i(1,1)
        glVertex3f(w,h,0.0)

        glTexCoord2i(1,0)
        glVertex3f(w,-h,0.0)

        glTexCoord2i(0,0)
        glVertex3f(-w,-h,0.0)

        glEnd()

        glPopMatrix()
If I replace the line "self.texture = glGenTextures(1)" in Sprite.__init__ with "self.texture = 0", then the texture is drawn fine! But then I get my previous problem where all textures turn out the same. I'm kinda ashamed that I'm having this problem, since it seems at first to be so basic, but I'm at a loss as to what to try. Hopefully a fresh perspective will notice my mistake quickly. Please tell me what I should do! Thanks for any help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I know this isn't the solution you wanted, but why not track texture names yourself?

You don't have to call glGenTextures() in order to use textures, it just takes the work out of tracking texture names.

So in your second texture, rather than having 0, use 1, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can you really? I guess I had sorta known that (since it worked when I just used 0), but figured it wasn't a safe bet. I'll try using that until/unless I can get the 'proper' solution.

Thanks. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ah interesting. I just used the above suggestion, but there's still a problem. The textures only work when I their number is 0. No others work. So the first texture that was loaded loaded fine, but all future textures just came up blank like before. I've checked and I am calculating the correct numbers (that is, 0,1,2... etc.)

And the plot thickens.

Edit: glGenTextures(1) returns first 1 and then 2. Hmm. When I run it outside of my program (aka: just inside of the python shell), it generates 'random' large numbers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Default texture minification filter requires a full mipmap set, but I don't see you either change it or loading a complete mipmap set. Load the rest, or set the minification filer to a non-mipmap filter.

Texture name 0 disables the texture object mechanism, and goes back to the old non-object texture mode from OpenGL 1.0 I think it was. I believe that default filter mode is non-mipmapped, so it works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks! That was the problem. I hadn't know that before, but all my previous code I had accidentally disabled it just because I wanted GL_LINEAR instead, so it had never been a problem until now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627759
    • Total Posts
      2978958
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now