Sign in to follow this  
wforl

OpenGL The big red Book

Recommended Posts

wforl    169
Hi guys, I currently have the book, beginning OpenGl game programming, and am kind of struggling, as in theres some stuff that just dont understand, and i thought that maybe a more explanational book would help. And i came across this book http://www.amazon.co.uk/OpenGL-Programming-Guide-Official-Learning/dp/0321335732/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/202-7256194-6888620?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1184233886&sr=8-1 does anybody have both of these books, and could they tell me, if they found the later easyier to read. I think that the first book is great, but maybe its for somone with a better understanding of programming than me, as they go through stuff quickly. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Treesong    170

I don't have both books but, as any serious OpenGL programmer should, I do have the red book.

When I started OpenGL programming (some 15 years or so back), I bought two books:
- The OpenGL Super Bible (http://www.starstonesoftware.com/OpenGL/)
- The OpenGL Programming Guide (http://www.opengl.org/documentation/red_book/)

I still think it's the perfect start for the beginning Graphics/OpenGL programmer.
The Red book can be used as a reference guide and adds very accessible explanations. The Super bible covers all basic topics in a clear step by step tutorial style. It also features full source code including project files for Visual studio of all examples in the book.

There is plenty of info on those book on the web, if you're not convinced.

I hope this helps,

Serge van Keulen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wforl    169
Thanks for your comments Treestory, both the books look great, and will probaly purchase them soon,

is there any that you would recommend over the other?

i also noticed that they've both been revised for 2007, ...cool

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Treesong    170
If you really have to pick one, and if you are beginning to learn OpenGL/Graphics programming I guess you should pick the Super bible. But the red book is something that ever OpenGL programmer should have within reach. Especially when you start using more advanced techniques.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ezbez    1164
I also started with Beginning OpenGL Game Programming. I, on the other hand, really liked it and learned a lot from it. I think that you could too.

As for a book going "through stuff rather quickly", you have to remember that it's a book. It is entirely self-paced. If you need more time on something, you can take that time on it. There's no set "must read 50 pages a week" schedule on a book. So take it slowly - don't move onto the next section before you truly understand the previous section. This stuff isn't easy; it takes time to learn it. But time you have when it's a book. If you need more information on a topic, search for it online. There's tons of stuff out there, including a free copy of the Red Book, which really is the definitive guide to OpenGL.

I guess what I'm saying is take you time and make sure to do the exercises and if you don't understand something, use your resources. There's lots online, so google. You can ask about more than just errors here; you can ask about topics you don't understand and I'm sure that someone will be able to either point you to a good site, or answer you themselves. But most importantly, don't give up.

Good luck. [smile]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gage64    1235
The second edition of the red book is free and can be found here. It's outdated but it still contains a lot of useful information and it will give you a feel for the book's writing style. I strongly recommend that you look at it before buying a new version. As many people will tell you, it can be quite daunting for someone new to 3D math of graphics.

I think an old version of the reference manual can also be found somewhere online.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now