Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
AlenWesker

OpenGL A method to Gain the Z buffer, Device independent

This topic is 3929 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I forget to write the subject in my last thread, faint, so I have to post it again here: It's nearly a mission imporsible to gain the data in Z-Buffer directly with Direct9. Normally, you can set a RenderTarget, write a Pixel Shader which outputs Z/W per pixel. Or you can depend on Z-Buffer Readable graphic cards, and copy the z-buffer surface to new surfaces. Both of these method are tough to be utilized in a real game engine. I will explain why after I explain my method. My method is based on the fact that if Z buffer works, it should cull those pixels whichs depth are deeper than the corresponding pixels in Z-buffer. So I just test it by writing a bunch of surfaces with different depth to the back buffer with different colors, and acquire the result by render target. The steps are showed as follows: 1. Complete drawing everything that you want the depth. For example: your terrain and your buildings. 2. Replace the RenderTarget with a new surface which are used to read and gain the result later. It should be as small as it should be. I thought 256*128 is quit enough. 3. Draw 256 surfaces in the post projection space with w = 0, z = 1 to 0, color = 256 to 0, namely far to near. Remember to shut lights and textures. 4. Use the render target in your shader, such as a shadow map second pass. Cheer up, you can now get the Depth without an extra pass. There are tricks in step 3: You only need to build a Vertex Buffer once, then you can use it whenever you want to launch the "Depth Drawing"(Lets call this method like this for short). You must use the stencil buffer to accelerate this process. You can decide how the Z value increases through surfaces by what your scene looks like. Because in D3D projection matrix, 33 = F/(F-N), 43 = -FN/(F-N) (F=Far Clip, Near = Near Clip), Depth in the post projection space should equal Zw = F(1 - N (1/Zv))/(F-N). You can figure out this formular on your own, and you can find that Zw in Depth Space (post projection Space) is actually linear to 1/Zv (Zv is the Depth in View Space). As a result , you can set z like this : V1.z = (256.0 / (256.0 - 1.0)) * (1.0 - 1.0/(DOUBLE)(i+1)); So the Z are linear to 1/i (i = 256 to 0). Make sure the Z is in [0, 1], because it is in post projection space of directx(OpenGl is [-1,1],depending on the projection matrix). You can find out in my codes that the surfaces I drawn are not parallel to the Near clip plate, because I use the D3DPT_TRIANGLESTRIP in DrawPrimitive method in order to reduce bandwidth consumption. The surfaces are acctually looks lick overlapping Zs from the top. This trick has an extra benefit that the color values and the depths of pixels are interpolated automatically by the hardware. The result render target will be worked out by the graphic card like this : 1. The surfaces with z increasing are drawn from far to near. 2. Once a surface with less Z passes Z test, it also means it is the first surface pass the Z test. The depth (can gained by the color) of the surface is the closest one to the value in Z-buffer. 3. it writes the stencil buffer to 1, telling the following pixel to skip. As you can see, there are many drawbacks in this method. First, it is highly pixel fill rate comsuming. It can be alleviated partially by making the render target smaller. Second, the precision is very low, because it can only provide 256 grads. You can try gain more grads with more faces, while it will surely consume more fill rate. This method is more suitable for Z correctiong, point z detection, and some other stages that don't require high z accuracy. Getting Z buffer is too tough a job in DX9. It can only be copy to a surface with same size and same format, but how can I use it anyway if they are the same. If you try to use a lockable depth surface, you are doomed. I try this with D16_Lockable and D32_Lockable, and once I lock, the fps drop from 600 to 12, even I unlock it immediatly without doing nothing and even the lock is called before BeginScene. I dont know whether other graphic cards will suffer this problem. The Lockable buffer is not pratical at all because even it can be locked, we have to do format convertion at lease once to gain the data in it, and it may be more slower than just render the scene twice with lights and textures shutted. In my opinion, why didn't the PS provide a register called iDepth, when there are already a oDepth avallable. It's baffling that once a segment get through all the tests and reach the Pixel Shader, it's depth has already been compared with the Z-buffer, and is it so tough to just pass the compare value to PS? Then we can have iDepth. If there is iDepth register(or Semantic) in PS, we can spare the gpu time to calculate z/w in the shadow map algorithm. Moreover, in the second pass of shadow map, we can also spare the gpu time to calcualte and pass the value of z/w in view space again. Newer DX versions have provided much easier way to get access to the depth buffer, however, it's not very pratical to ask out customer to buy a 8800 before buying our game, isn't it? Any people who has any thought about this method, feel free to reply. I am eager to chat about methods to get the Z buffer. codes are shown as follows:(I omit most trivial details) 3.1 Build The Buffer struct TypeRectVertex { enum{fvf = D3DFVF_XYZRHW | D3DFVF_DIFFUSE,}; FLOAT x,y,z,w; D3DCOLOR color; } enum{ numquos = numlevel,//256 numvertices = numquos * 2 +2, vb_size = numvertices * sizeof(TypeRectVertex), }; ZeroMemory(m_VBInMemory, sizeof(TypeRectVertex) * _countof(m_VBInMemory)); _ASSERTE(pd3dDevice); _ASSERTE(numlevel %2 == 0 && numlevel <= 256); const D3DSURFACE_DESC* pSurfaceDesc = DXUTGetBackBufferSurfaceDesc(); if(!pSurfaceDesc) return; FLOAT fWidth = (FLOAT)pSurfaceDesc->Width; FLOAT fHeight = (FLOAT)pSurfaceDesc->Height; LPDIRECT3DVERTEXBUFFER9 lpVBTemp = NULL; HRESULT hr = pd3dDevice->CreateVertexBuffer(vb_size, 0, TypeRectVertex::fvf, D3DPOOL_MANAGED, &lpVBTemp, NULL); if(FAILED(hr)) return; LPVOID lpData = NULL; if(SUCCEEDED(lpVBTemp->Lock(0, vb_size, &lpData, 0))) { { TypeRectVertex * const pVertices = (TypeRectVertex*)m_VBInMemory; _ASSERTE(pVertices); for(int i = numvertices/2 - 1; i >= 0; i--) { TypeRectVertex V1; V1.x = i%2 == 0 ? 0 : fWidth; V1.y = 0; V1.w = 1; V1.z = (256.0 / (256.0 - 1.0)) * (1.0 - 1.0/(DOUBLE)(i+1)); int nColor = (INT)(V1.z * 256.0f); V1.color = D3DCOLOR_XRGB(nColor, nColor, nColor); TRACE2("X:%f, Z:%f\n",V1.x, V1.z); TypeRectVertex V2; V2.x = V1.x; V2.y = fHeight; V2.w = 1; V2.z = V1.z; V2.color = V1.color; TRACE2("X:%f, Z:%f\n",V2.x, V2.z); int nPlace = numvertices - 2 - i * 2; pVertices[nPlace] = V1; pVertices[nPlace+1] = V2; } memcpy_s(lpData, vb_size, pVertices, vb_size); } lpVBTemp->Unlock(); m_pVB = lpVBTemp; lpVBTemp = NULL; } SAFE_RELEASE(lpVBTemp); 3.2 State Setters: I use temporary struct which's constructor will record the states, and the destructor will apply the states. You should make sure these states are reverted to normal after the "Depth Drawing". You should understand these codes if you are familiar to those annoying D3DRS constants. ExtraStateApplying.m_pDevice = pd3dDevice; ExtraStateApplying.m_bZEnable = D3DZB_TRUE; ExtraStateApplying.m_bZWriteEnable = D3DZB_FALSE; ExtraStateApplying.m_Color = 0xffffffffff; ExtraStateApplying.tss_colorop = D3DTOP_SELECTARG1; ExtraStateApplying.tss_colorarg1 = D3DTA_DIFFUSE; ExtraStateApplying.dwCull = D3DCULL_NONE; StencilStateTemp.m_Enable = TRUE; StencilStateTemp.m_Fail = D3DSTENCILOP_KEEP; StencilStateTemp.m_ZFail = D3DSTENCILOP_ZERO; StencilStateTemp.m_Pass = D3DSTENCILOP_REPLACE; StencilStateTemp.m_Func = D3DCMP_GREATER; StencilStateTemp.m_Ref = 0x00000001; StencilStateTemp.m_Mask = 0xffffffff; StencilStateTemp.m_WriteMask = 0xffffffff; 3.3 Draw pd3dDevice->DrawPrimitive(D3DPT_TRIANGLESTRIP, 0, numquos*2);

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
One way to get a depth texture with one pass is to simply render everything to a floating point surface, and always output the depth to the alpha channel.. do alpha testing with clip...Doesnt work with transparent polygons however.

I imagine you can fiddle with th numbers and pack it somewhere else also..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dont't think I am fiddling, man. I forgot to explain why I try to figure out such a tiresome method. As you say, you can simply get the depth by render the scene. You mean render every thing again with a PS outputs Z/W or use mul-render target, right?

What if there's no chance to render the scene again? That is the problem I am facing to. Believe me, I 've read lots of articles about shadows rendering.


I am now working on a complex program, which codes have been accumulated to an suffering height. It is extremly diffical for me to insert codes in those render functions, because most of them are written months ago by others without serious planned and most of them are nearly refraction incompatible. The best way to implement codes to launch a clean Z-buffer rendering, as you memsion, is to rewrite many codes to insert "RenderShadow" method in those model classes and every scene object classes. Moreover, some of our trees do not have a shader. That's why I try to implement such a bizarrerie method, when the boss is urging a realtime shadow.

I think few 3d programmers need to get z-buffer like this, if they have time to implement a depth rendering. I present this bizarrerie method just for exchanging ideas with you guys to figure out such adverse a situation.

At lease, my method has one advantage, isn't it? It only needs z-buffer :>

PS : who can tell me how to place an image on the thread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by AlenWesker
I dont't think I am fiddling, man. I forgot to explain why I try to figure out such a tiresome method. As you say, you can simply get the depth by render the scene. You mean render every thing again with a PS outputs Z/W or use mul-render target, right?

What if there's no chance to render the scene again? That is the problem I am facing to. Believe me, I 've read lots of articles about shadows rendering.

I don't understand how your method solves the problem of not needing an extra pass. A normal shadow mapping algorithm works like this:

1. Render scene from the viewpoint of the light
2. Render the scene from the camera's viewpoint, comparing depth to the previous render

This inherently draws the scene twice.

If you're just talking about drawing step 1 twice, there's no need for this, since the scene itself need not be rendered. All you need is the Z buffer, and you can get that by rendering Z to a floating point texture.

Which is why I say that I don't understand what the exact problem is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by AlenWeskerWhat if there's no chance to render the scene again?


Actually my method means that you only render your main scene once...you just always render the depth to the alpha channel while rendering the colors...that's the point, as 'ET3D' says..

I was just considering the idea that you wanted a copy of the depth buffer only from the camera position, not for shadow mapping. But for shadow mapping you need to render the scene from the light's point of view, so there is nothing in the z-buffer stored already, so your method makes no sense at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey, I think few guys have met my situation, so it's not surprising that it is so hard to explain. Normally, Shadow Map really needs render the scene twice. If you have fully control of your shaders and your models, just do as what you guys say. And if only the shadow is needed ,just render the shadow at the same time in the second pass with PS. We don't even need to render the depth into the alpha in this situation.

However, what if some objects are render with no shaders, and the codes have been messed up into great chaos? The best way is to sort them and add codes to do as what you suggests. I will do that some day, but not now, for the sake that the refration of this kind of mess is not a one-day job.

In order to just realize the shadow in a short time, I do like this:
1. Just let those messed-up codes do what they are supposed to do, even some objects are rendered without a shader.
2. Use the bizzare method I introduced above to get the depth.
3. Render the moving objects only to gain a shadow map.
4. Render the shadow using the depth map obtained in step 3,with every pixel being compared to the shadow map.

It does not save a pass, and what I mean is that I don't need to modify any previous codes to get the depth-----no need to modify shaders, and no need to dig a hole into those codes in chaos.

This bizzare method is temporary, however, it do provide a way to get the depth even you don't have shaders available, isn't it? I have no word to say if you insist I am fiddling.

Actually, I do not need to render my shadow like this right now, because I just implement a simply way to have soft shadow volumes yesterday. Let the depth go to hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Similar Content

    • By owenjr
      Hi, I'm a Multimedia Engineering student. I am about to finish my dergree and I'm already thinking about what topic to cover in my final college project.
      I'm interested in the procedural animation with c++ and OpenGL of creatures, something like a spider for example. Can someone tell me what are the issues I should investigate to carry it out? I understand that it has some dependence on artificial intelligence but I do not know to what extent. Can someone help me to find information about it? Thank you very much.
       
      Examples: 
      - Procedural multi-legged walking animation
      - Procedural Locomotion of Multi-Legged Characters in Dynamic Environments
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm still on my quest to unterstanding the intricacies of HDR and implementing this into my engine. Currently i'm at the step to implementing tonemapping. I stumbled upon this blogposts:
      http://filmicworlds.com/blog/filmic-tonemapping-operators/
      http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/2012/09/tech-feature-hdr-lightning.html
      and tried to implement some of those mentioned tonemapping methods into my postprocessing shader.
      The issue is that none of them creates the same results as shown in the blogpost which definitely has to do with the initial range in which the values are stored in the HDR buffer. For simplicity sake i store the values between 0 and 1 in the HDR buffer (ambient light is 0.3, directional light is 0.7)
      This is the tonemapping code:
      vec3 Uncharted2Tonemap(vec3 x) { float A = 0.15; float B = 0.50; float C = 0.10; float D = 0.20; float E = 0.02; float F = 0.30; return ((x*(A*x+C*B)+D*E)/(x*(A*x+B)+D*F))-E/F; } This is without the uncharted tonemapping:
      This is with the uncharted tonemapping:
      Which makes the image a lot darker.
      The shader code looks like this:
      void main() { vec3 color = texture2D(texture_diffuse, vTexcoord).rgb; color = Uncharted2Tonemap(color); //gamma correction (use only if not done in tonemapping code) color = gammaCorrection(color); outputF = vec4(color,1.0f); } Now, from my understanding is that tonemapping should bring the range down from HDR to 0-1.
      But the output of the tonemapping function heavily depends on the initial range of the values in the HDR buffer. (You can't expect to set the sun intensity the first time to 10 and the second time to 1000 and excpect the same result if you feed that into the tonemapper.) So i suppose that this also depends on the exposure which i have to implement?
      To check this i plotted the tonemapping curve:
      You can see that the curve goes only up to around to a value of 0.21 (while being fed a value of 1) and then basically flattens out. (which would explain why the image got darker.)
       
      My guestion is: In what range should the values in the HDR buffer be which then get tonemapped? Do i have to bring them down to a range of 0-1 by multiplying with the exposure?
      For example, if i increase the values of the light by 10 (directional light would be 7 and ambient light 3) then i would need to divide HDR values by 10 in order to get a value range of 0-1 which then could be fed into the tonemapping curve. Is that correct?
    • By nOoNEE
      i am reading this book : link
      in the OpenGL Rendering Pipeline section there is a picture like this: link
      but the question is this i dont really understand why it is necessary to turn pixel data in to fragment and then fragment into pixel could please give me a source or a clear Explanation that why it is necessary ? thank you so mu
       
       
    • By Inbar_xz
      I'm using the OPENGL with eclipse+JOGL.
      My goal is to create movement of the camera and the player.
      I create main class, which create some box in 3D and hold 
      an object of PlayerAxis.
      I create PlayerAxis class which hold the axis of the player.
      If we want to move the camera, then in the main class I call to 
      the func "cameraMove"(from PlayerAxis) and it update the player axis.
      That's work good.
      The problem start if I move the camera on 2 axis, 
      for example if I move with the camera right(that's on the y axis)
      and then down(on the x axis) -
      in some point the move front is not to the front anymore..
      In order to move to the front, I do
      player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1);
      And I learn that in order to keep the front move, 
      I need to convert (0, 0, 1) to the player axis, and then add this.
      I think I dont do the convert right.. 
      I will be glad for help!

      Here is part of my PlayerAxis class:
       
      //player coordinate float x[] = new float[3]; float y[] = new float[3]; float z[] = new float[3]; public PlayerAxis(float move_step, float angle_move) { x[0] = 1; y[1] = 1; z[2] = -1; step = move_step; angle = angle_move; setTransMatrix(); } public void cameraMoving(float angle_step, String axis) { float[] new_x = x; float[] new_y = y; float[] new_z = z; float alfa = angle_step * angle; switch(axis) { case "x": new_z = addVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); break; case "y": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); new_z = subVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); break; case "z": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); } x = new_x; y = new_y; z = new_z; normalization(); } public void playerMoving(float x_move, float y_move, float z_move) { float[] move = new float[3]; move[0] = x_move; move[1] = y_move; move[2] = z_move; setTransMatrix(); float[] trans_move = transVector(move); position[0] = position[0] + step*trans_move[0]; position[1] = position[1] + step*trans_move[1]; position[2] = position[2] + step*trans_move[2]; } public void setTransMatrix() { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { coordiTrans[0][i] = x[i]; coordiTrans[1][i] = y[i]; coordiTrans[2][i] = z[i]; } } public float[] transVector(float[] v) { return multiplyMatrixInVector(coordiTrans, v); }  
      and in the main class i have this:
       
      public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) { if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_ESCAPE) { System.exit(0); //player move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_W) { //front //moveAmount[2] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_S) { //back //moveAmount[2] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, -1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_A) { //left //moveAmount[0] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(-1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_D) { //right //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_E) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 1, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_Q) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, -1, 0); //camera move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_I) { //up player.cameraMoving(1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_K) { //down player.cameraMoving(-1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_L) { //right player.cameraMoving(-1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_J) { //left player.cameraMoving(1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_O) { //right round player.cameraMoving(-1, "z"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_U) { //left round player.cameraMoving(1, "z"); } }  
      finallt found it.... i confused with the transformation matrix row and col. thanks anyway!
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm currently trying to implement an SSAO shader from THIS tutorial and i'm running into a few issues here.
      Now, this SSAO method requires view space positions and normals. I'm storing the normals in my deferred renderer in world-space so i had to do a conversion and reconstruct the position from the depth buffer.
      And something there goes horribly wrong (which has probably to do with worldspace to viewspace transformations).
      (here is the full shader source code if someone wants to take a look at it)
      Now, i suspect that the normals are the culprit.
      vec3 normal = ((uNormalViewMatrix*vec4(normalize(texture2D(sNormals, vTexcoord).rgb),1.0)).xyz); "sNormals" is a 2D texture which stores the normals in world space in a RGB FP16 buffer.
      Now i can't use the camera viewspace matrix to transform the normals into viewspace as the cameras position isn't set at (0,0,0), thus skewing the result.
      So what i did is to create a new viewmatrix specifically for this normal without the position at vec3(0,0,0);
      //"camera" is the camera which was used for rendering the normal buffer renderer.setUniform4m(ressources->shaderSSAO->getUniform("uNormalViewMatrix"), glmExt::createViewMatrix(glm::vec3(0,0,0),camera.getForward(),camera.getUp())//parameters are (position,forwardVector,upVector) ); Though i have the feeling this is the wrong approach. Is this right or is there a better/correct way of transforming a world space normal into viewspace?
    • By HawkDeath
      Hi,
      I'm trying mix two textures using own shader system, but I have a problem (I think) with uniforms.
      Code: https://github.com/HawkDeath/shader/tree/test
      To debug I use RenderDocs, but I did not receive good results. In the first attachment is my result, in the second attachment is what should be.
      PS. I base on this tutorial https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Textures.


    • By norman784
      I'm having issues loading textures, as I'm clueless on how to handle / load images maybe I missing something, but the past few days I just google a lot to try to find a solution. Well theres two issues I think, one I'm using Kotlin Native (EAP) and OpenGL wrapper / STB image, so I'm not quite sure wheres the issue, if someone with more experience could give me some hints on how to solve this issue?
      The code is here, if I'm not mistaken the workflow is pretty straight forward, stbi_load returns the pixels of the image (as char array or byte array) and you need to pass those pixels directly to glTexImage2D, so a I'm missing something here it seems.
      Regards
    • By Hashbrown
      I've noticed in most post processing tutorials several shaders are used one after another: one for bloom, another for contrast, and so on. For example: 
      postprocessing.quad.bind() // Effect 1 effect1.shader.bind(); postprocessing.texture.bind(); postprocessing.quad.draw(); postprocessing.texture.unbind(); effect1.shader.unbind(); // Effect 2 effect2.shader.bind(); // ...and so on postprocessing.quad.unbind() Is this good practice, how many shaders can I bind and unbind before I hit performance issues? I'm afraid I don't know what the good practices are in open/webGL regarding binding and unbinding resources. 
      I'm guessing binding many shaders at post processing is okay since the scene has already been updated and I'm just working on a quad and texture at that moment. Or is it more optimal to put shader code in chunks and bind less frequently? I'd love to use several shaders at post though. 
      Another example of what I'm doing at the moment:
      1) Loop through GameObjects, bind its phong shader (send color, shadow, spec, normal samplers), unbind all.
      2) At post: bind post processor quad, and loop/bind through different shader effects, and so on ...
      Thanks all! 
    • By phil67rpg
      void collision(int v) { collision_bug_one(0.0f, 10.0f); glutPostRedisplay(); glutTimerFunc(1000, collision, 0); } void coll_sprite() { if (board[0][0] == 1) { collision(0); flag[0][0] = 1; } } void erase_sprite() { if (flag[0][0] == 1) { glColor3f(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); glBegin(GL_POLYGON); glVertex3f(0.0f, 10.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(0.0f, 9.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(1.0f, 9.0f, 0.0f); glVertex3f(1.0f, 10.0f, 0.0f); glEnd(); } } I am using glutTimerFunc to wait a small amount of time to display a collision sprite before I black out the sprite. unfortunately my code only blacks out the said sprite without drawing the collision sprite, I have done a great deal of research on the glutTimerFunc and  animation.
    • By Lewa
      So, i stumbled upon the topic of gamma correction.
      https://learnopengl.com/Advanced-Lighting/Gamma-Correction
      So from what i've been able to gather: (Please correct me if i'm wrong)
      Old CRT monitors couldn't display color linearly, that's why gamma correction was nessecary. Modern LCD/LED monitors don't have this issue anymore but apply gamma correction anyway. (For compatibility reasons? Can this be disabled?) All games have to apply gamma correction? (unsure about that) All textures stored in file formats (.png for example) are essentially stored in SRGB color space (as what we see on the monitor is skewed due to gamma correction. So the pixel information is the same, the percieved colors are just wrong.) This makes textures loaded into the GL_RGB format non linear, thus all lighting calculations are wrong You have to always use the GL_SRGB format to gamma correct/linearise textures which are in SRGB format  
      Now, i'm kinda confused how to proceed with applying gamma correction in OpenGL.
      First of, how can i check if my Monitor is applying gamma correction? I noticed in my monitor settings that my color format is set to "RGB" (can't modify it though.) I'm connected to my PC via a HDMI cable. I'm also using the full RGB range (0-255, not the 16 to ~240 range)
       
      What i tried to do is to apply a gamma correction shader shown in the tutorial above which looks essentially like this: (it's a postprocess shader which is applied at the end of the renderpipeline)
      vec3 gammaCorrection(vec3 color){ // gamma correction color = pow(color, vec3(1.0/2.2)); return color; } void main() { vec3 color; vec3 tex = texture2D(texture_diffuse, vTexcoord).rgb; color = gammaCorrection(tex); outputF = vec4(color,1.0f); } The results look like this:
      No gamma correction:
      With gamma correction:
       
      The colors in the gamma corrected image look really wased out. (To the point that it's damn ugly. As if someone overlayed a white half transparent texture. I want the colors to pop.)
      Do i have to change the textures from GL_RGB to GL_SRGB in order to gamma correct them in addition to applying the post process gamma correction shader? Do i have to do the same thing with all FBOs? Or is this washed out look the intended behaviour?
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      631380
    • Total Posts
      2999672
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Participate in the game development conversation and more when you create an account on GameDev.net!

Sign me up!