MLP + overfitting
Author
Hi!
I'm using MATLAB to simulate MLP.
so i'm using a validation set, but when i draw the error graph, I see the the error of the validation set is going down and then flattens.
I DO want it to go up after a while... but it doesn't.
Anybdoy knows why it can happen?
Do you have a link or code example?
thanks!
That can happen because the model doesn't have enough parameters to allow overfitting. You'll probably see the effect you expect if you add more neurons to the hidden layer(s).
Just a question here - why do you want it to exhibit overtraining? Isn't overtraining a bad thing?
Author
It is, but i need it for an exercise i'm doing.
plus it helps me know when I should training the network :)
plus it helps me know when I should training the network :)
Have you tried a lower learning rate? You may be pushing the training to the nearest local minimum. You might see what you're looking for if you decrease the learning rate and run for a higher number of iterations. Also keep the number of hidden nodes on the high side and you should see a badly overtrained network.
Seems weird to offer suggestions on how to overtrain. 8^O
Seems weird to offer suggestions on how to overtrain. 8^O
Use a smaller training set? Or select a training set that misses out very important examples...
Author
Ok, thanks! It goes up a little bit.
But I have another question...
I'm tryinf to reduce the variance error by adding more "experts" but as I add more and more of them the variance doesn't go down and even worse - the validation set error GOES UP! (it's not going down and goes up, it's more like a high straight line)
It's very strange because i'm pretty sure i calculated the variance well.
can you tell me why?
But I have another question...
I'm tryinf to reduce the variance error by adding more "experts" but as I add more and more of them the variance doesn't go down and even worse - the validation set error GOES UP! (it's not going down and goes up, it's more like a high straight line)
It's very strange because i'm pretty sure i calculated the variance well.
can you tell me why?
When you say "adding more experts" do you mean that you are developing an ensemble model? This would involved training multiple, independent models (neural nets in your case) and combining the results. Is this correct?
-Kirk
-Kirk
Author
quote]Original post by kirkd
When you say "adding more experts" do you mean that you are developing an ensemble model? This would involved training multiple, independent models (neural nets in your case) and combining the results. Is this correct?
-Kirk[/quote
yes :)
[Edited by - Idov on September 27, 2007 2:33:16 PM]
When you say "adding more experts" do you mean that you are developing an ensemble model? This would involved training multiple, independent models (neural nets in your case) and combining the results. Is this correct?
-Kirk[/quote
yes :)
[Edited by - Idov on September 27, 2007 2:33:16 PM]
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
