class CTest
{
int m_Int;
void SetInt(int iInt)
{
m_Int = iInt;
}
};
const CTest Test;
const CTest@ TestHandle = @Test;
TestHandle.SetInt(1); // compiler incorrectly thinks this line is OK ???
Test.SetInt(1); // compiler will correctly give an error on this line
const not handled for object handles ?
Author
Hi,
If i write the following code in angelscript :
Then the angelscript compiler gives correctly an error on "Test.SetInt(1);" stating that a matching const function cannot be found.
It does not give an error however on the line "TestHandle.SetInt(1);" even though that one is also declared const and the handle references a const object.
The same happens if functions declared in the C++ code return const handles to objects. Any non const functions called on those const object handles will not generate a compiler error.
Is this a bug in the angelscript compiler or am I using handles wrongly ???
Thanks in advance.
By The Way, Angelscript is Great !!
This looks like a bug in AngelScript. I'll give it a closer look as soon as I can. Thanks for the clear explanation.
Regards,
Andreas
Regards,
Andreas
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
