Sign in to follow this  
Rydinare

OpenGL Textured Cube Renders Slowly

Recommended Posts

Rydinare    487
Hi all. I made a class which encapsulates an OpenGL textured cube. What I'm noticing is that the rendering rates are fairly slow on my hardware (GeForce 7300 GS). I was thinking that it might be due to the size of my texture. The texture I'm using is 2150 x 1250. I remember reading something that it's always best to use power-of-2 textures. In addition, thinking about it, I don't think I need such a high resolution texture, but I do want to keep the shape the same. What's the best way to approach this problem? Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jouley    805
Why do you want to keep the shape? If you're mapping it onto a cube, then it's going to end up a square, anyway. So just use your favorite image editing software to change the image size to something more manageable, like 1024x512.

If you absolutely have to keep the relative sizes, resize the image to something smaller, then pad around the top and right edges to make the texture a power of two in either direction. Then, when applying the texture, use modified texture coordinates:
glTexCoord2f(1.0f, 1.0f);
becomes
glTexCoord2f(originalWidth / biggerPowerOfTwoWidth, originalHeight / biggerPowerOfTwoHeight);

I'd say just go with the first approach, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rydinare    487
You have a good point that the shape of the texture doesn't really matter, as the texture coordinates are going to determine how it gets mapped anyway. I do have one concern, though. It's going to scale it down to fit the object proportionally, based on those texture coordinates. How smooth is the scaling? Will it get blocky if I do this?

I did scale the image down with an image program and I did notice a significant speed gain, so the size of the texture may have been at least part of my performance issue.

I appreciate your input and assistance.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jouley    805
Quote:
Original post by Rydinare
I do have one concern, though. It's going to scale it down to fit the object proportionally, based on those texture coordinates. How smooth is the scaling? Will it get blocky if I do this?

Quick answer: How does it look?

A little more: glTexParameter determines what happens when textures have to become bigger or smaller, in particular the GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER and GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER parameters. You could make it look blocky with a value of GL_NEAREST, but you'll probably want to use something like GL_LINEAR. If that still won't do for you, you'll want to look into mipmaps. Google has plenty of information on that topic, but post away if you have questions after giving it a go if you deem it worthwhile.

[Edit: The above is for when the texture itself is either too big or too small for what's being presented to the screen. I see now that you're asking about fitting the texture on a different-sized object. That's nothing to worry about, the texels will be interpolated as well as they can be for a given resolution. So, the higher your resolution, the better it will look, naturally, but any modern resolution will be more than adequate.]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
    • By markshaw001
      Hi i am new to this forum  i wanted to ask for help from all of you i want to generate real time terrain using a 32 bit heightmap i am good at c++ and have started learning Opengl as i am very interested in making landscapes in opengl i have looked around the internet for help about this topic but i am not getting the hang of the concepts and what they are doing can some here suggests me some good resources for making terrain engine please for example like tutorials,books etc so that i can understand the whole concept of terrain generation.
       
  • Popular Now