Sign in to follow this  
Myke111

OpenGL Get Available Space for 3D Texture

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I'm trying to render a cube with a 3D texture on it and have trouble when the texturesize becomes to big. I tried a few things to figure out where the texture will be ok or not. 1) First: i figure out which maximum texture size is supported and which version of opengl i'm using.
int texSize[3];
glGetIntegerv(GL_MAX_3D_TEXTURE_SIZE, texSize);
const GLubyte* string = glGetString(GL_VERSION);

The results are: <512, uninitialized, uninitialized> for texSize and 2.0.1 for string. I assume that this means that the maximum size is <512, 512, 512> 2) Second: i use a proxy texture to find out whether there is enough space for the texture or not
glTexImage3D(GL_PROXY_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_RGBA, 
             extent[0], extent[1], extent[2],
             0, GL_LUMINANCE, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, 0);
GLint width, height, depth;
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_PROXY_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_WIDTH, &width);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_PROXY_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_HEIGHT, &height);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_PROXY_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_DEPTH, &depth);

The extent i'm using is <512, 512, 267>. The width height and depth values are set according to the extent. After that i thought: Well looks good for my texture to fit into memory. 3) Third: Now i'm using Texture Objects to Bind the Texture with the following code
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_3D, identifiers[textureId]);

glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_3D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE);
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_3D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE);
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_3D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_R, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE);
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_3D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);
glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_3D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);

// extent[0], extent[1], extent[2],
glTexImage3D(GL_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_RGBA, 
             extent[0], extent[1], extent[2], 
             0, GL_LUMINANCE, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, image);
delete[] image;
glEnable(GL_TEXTURE_3D);//*/

4) Fourth: I would like to check whether the texture is now ready to use or not, and did the following:
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_3D, identifiers[textureId]);
GLint residency;
glGetTexParameteriv(GL_TEXTURE_3D, GL_TEXTURE_RESIDENT, &residency);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_WIDTH, &width);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_HEIGHT, &height);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_DEPTH, &depth);

Cause' the width, height and depth values are still equal to the extent and not 0 i thought everything is ok. So whats the problem now: When i use glTexImage3D with my extent than the window is black. When i call it like this:
glTexImage3D(GL_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_RGBA, extent[0], extent[1], 220, 0, GL_LUMINANCE, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, image);

everything is ok. When i call it with 230 the window is black. So how can i find out why the window is black. Is it because the texture is to big? But why is glGetTexLevelParameteriv still returning non-zero values? looking forward to your help!!! myke

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1) - It returns only the depth parameter actually, so the maximum 3D texture resolution in your case is x*x*512 (where x is GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE, usually 2048 on today hardware)

As for proxy textures, IIRC OpenGL is talking about size (as in dimensions), not space (as in memory space, which cannot be portably determined), thus seeing that you're texture is 512x512x267xRGBA => more then 256MB, i'd say that yes, you may be running out of graphics memory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your reply snoutmate!
You are right, the texture is just to big. I didn't consider that, cause my texture is actually just ~68MB large, but with the internal format it becomes 4*68 which is too big. It works by changing the the glTexImage3D command to:


glTexImage3D(GL_TEXTURE_3D, 0, GL_LUMINANCE, extent[0], extent[1], extent[2], 0, GL_LUMINANCE, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, image);




I'm still interested if it is possible to find out at runtime, that a texture was to big? Cause' when you have more than one objects in memory and you don't know the exact size of each of them, it would still be interesting to find out how much space is left, or at least to find out if the data (GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, GL_TEXTURE_*) was bound successfully.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Myke111
I'm still interested if it is possible to find out at runtime, that a texture was to big? Cause' when you have more than one objects in memory and you don't know the exact size of each of them, it would still be interesting to find out how much space is left, or at least to find out if the data (GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, GL_TEXTURE_*) was bound successfully.


What you are doing is correct.
http://www.opengl.org/resources/faq/technical/texture.htm
shows the same method.

Perhaps your driver is buggy.
I would also call glGetError after creating the real texture to see if it returns any errors. Maybe it will return GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628402
    • Total Posts
      2982471
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now