Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL [DX9] Alpha to Coverage

Recommended Posts

coderchris    304
Hey, So, im investigating alpha to coverage, and for some reason I cannot get it to work in Directx9. Iv got it working in OpenGL and Dx10 (on 8800), but for some reason I cant get it working in DX9. When I try to enable it with: device->SetRenderState(D3DRS_POINTSIZE, MAKEFOURCC('A','2','M','1')); There is no transparency at all, no alpha testing, nothing....just my textured billboard, and wherever there is a pixel that should have been transparent, it is black. I got that code from an ATI example. Is it possible that with directx9, ATI cards are the only ones that support Alpha to coverage? or is there a hack for nvidia cards that will enable it in DX9? (that code which works on ATI looks like a hack itself...)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
nVidia has it's own set of hacks to choose which type of coverage AA you want, which is here

Call GetAdapaterIdentifier to find what hardware is installed. You can figure out the type of card via the vendor id (0x1002 = ATI, 0x10DE = nVidia, 0x8086 = Intel). From there, use whichever hack is needed.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
coderchris    304
So, in initializing my engine, Im checking weather or not alpha to coverage is supported or not.

On nvidia this is easy, they show how to do it in the white paper:


However, ATI doesnt give any info on how to check this. The way to enable it is like this:
device->SetRenderState(D3DRS_POINTSIZE, MAKEFOURCC('A','2','M','1'));

So, im guessing that to check weather this is supported on ATI, ill basically use the same code as above, but Im confused as to what to but in for the resource type parameter:

d3d->CheckDeviceFormat(D3DADAPTER_DEFAULT, D3DDEVTYPE_HAL, D3DFMT_X8R8G8B8, 0, ???WhatGoesHere???, (D3DFORMAT)MAKEFOURCC('A', '2', 'M', '1'))) == S_OK;

Since it uses point size to enable, i dont think D3DRTYPE_SURFACE will work here...
Any Ideas?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
coderchris    304
Hmm, no method to test? that stinks... I guess Ill just do what you did and assume its avaliable (shader model 3 is a requirement for my engine anyway)

Thank you for checking though

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now