Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
klaymore142

Silly question about NURBS

This topic is 3828 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hey all, Perhaps someone with some experience with NURBS surface deformations and Terrain rendering can answer this question. I have a Terrain engine which seems to work well - it generates a ROAM-style mesh, which I render with Vertex Arrays. The main goal is to make the terrain look very realistic, with a mimimum of polygons. However, I am thinking (to make the terrain look smoother up-close) about using the active vertex list as deformation points for a NURBS surface, and rendering the surface as the terrain. I'm worried that it will just create a bunch of polygons - and won't be very efficient. Also, that it will give the terrain a very rounded and smooth look, which is good for plains but not for rocky crags. Any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
Nurbs seem quite heavy for that purpose. You could also do it by subdividing, then smoothing the surface (catmull-clark algorithm). In any case, you will get a smoothed surface.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!