• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Unity Base class to derivative function calls

This topic is 3576 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure where to find further reading on the matter - or what in particular to search for - so I thought I'd pick some brains around here and learn what I can on the topic, and hopefully get some terminology for the situation so I can better investigate on my own as well. I have a set of classes in my C++ project, where there is a base abstract class and numerous concrete classes derived from it (those concrete classes may have children classes as well, but for now let's leave it simple).
class BaseClass {
virtual stuff() = 0;
};

class SomeClass : public BaseClass {
};

class SomeOtherClass : public BaseClass {
};
Now, I want to make sure these classes ALWAYS do a certain call upon construction and upon destruction, which would then be a virtual function redefined by class. Since I don't want to have the end user (or me!) have to add the function call to every one of the derived constructors, as there could potentially be a huge number of them, I wanted to do something in the base class's constructor, like this:
class BaseClass {
BaseClass() { this->LoadStuff(); }
virtual LoadStuff() = 0;
};

class SomeClass : public BaseClass {
LoadStuff() { /* do things my way */ }
};

class SomeOtherClass : public BaseClass {
LoadStuff() { /* I'm so awesomely different! */ }
};
However, when I arrange it in this fashion, either it yells at me about LoadStuff being undefined, or (if I define LoadStuff with default functionality in BaseClass) it won't give me the desired effect of calling the derived class's version of LoadStuff(). Halp? :( I greatly appreciate any advice on the situation. Thanks! (Also, intense forums, I'm really enjoying my time here - very, very helpful and friendly community!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
To work around this problem, there are a bunch of mechanisms that you can use to get the virtual method called for you.

For example, if your derived classes are created by a factory, the factory can call the additional initialization function before returning you the object.

Alternatively, you might choose to use something akin to the strategy pattern. For example, if I want a hierarchy based around an Enemy base class, I can create Enemys that behave differently by creating derived Brain's instead and leave Enemy as a concrete class e.g.


class Brain
{
public:
virtual ~Brain() { }
virtual void connectSynapses() = 0;
// ...
};

class OgreBrain : public Brain
{
public:
virtual void connectSynapses() { /* ... */ }
// ...
};


class Enemy
{
public:
Enemy(const shared_ptr<Brain> &brain) :
brain_(brain)
{
assert(brain_);
brain_->connectSynapses(); // further initialiszation function
}

// ...

private:
shared_ptr<Brain> brain_;
};

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm aware there's no implicit return type. I was simplifying down to the bare minimum so there wouldn't be any confusion regarding implementation-specifics. Something like a cross between pseudocode and real C++.

Upon reading that article you linked, I think I just realized the flaw in what I was attempting to do. I confused the order of constructor/destructor calls in building the object for some odd reason - I had assumed the constructor, for whatever reason, would be capable of dereferencing
this
to call a virtual function... may have been late night (early morning?) fatigue which resulted in me taking that assumption from the derivative constructor:

class SomeClass : public BaseClass {
SomeClass(param a, param b) : BaseClass(a) { /* do something with b */ }
}


So it must have appeared to my muddled mind that the base & abstract classes are instantiated in the object, then the derived constructor is called, then it does the assignments(? not sure on the term) after the :, which calls the BaseClass constructor within the SomeClass constructor.

Regardless, that clarifies that. However... now the new question arises: is there any way to do what I described earlier? (To prevent duplicating the code across every class.)

Much obligued and thanks for the help, wild_pointer.

Edit: the_edd must have had a premonition and answered me as I was typing my reply. :P Thanks! Much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Manuel Berger
      Hello fellow devs!
      Once again I started working on an 2D adventure game and right now I'm doing the character-movement/animation. I'm not a big math guy and I was happy about my solution, but soon I realized that it's flawed.
      My player has 5 walking-animations, mirrored for the left side: up, upright, right, downright, down. With the atan2 function I get the angle between player and destination. To get an index from 0 to 4, I divide PI by 5 and see how many times it goes into the player-destination angle.

      In Pseudo-Code:
      angle = atan2(destination.x - player.x, destination.y - player.y) //swapped y and x to get mirrored angle around the y axis
      index = (int) (angle / (PI / 5));
      PlayAnimation(index); //0 = up, 1 = up_right, 2 = right, 3 = down_right, 4 = down

      Besides the fact that when angle is equal to PI it produces an index of 5, this works like a charm. Or at least I thought so at first. When I tested it, I realized that the up and down animation is playing more often than the others, which is pretty logical, since they have double the angle.

      What I'm trying to achieve is something like this, but with equal angles, so that up and down has the same range as all other directions.

      I can't get my head around it. Any suggestions? Is the whole approach doomed?

      Thank you in advance for any input!
       
    • By devbyskc
      Hi Everyone,
      Like most here, I'm a newbie but have been dabbling with game development for a few years. I am currently working full-time overseas and learning the craft in my spare time. It's been a long but highly rewarding adventure. Much of my time has been spent working through tutorials. In all of them, as well as my own attempts at development, I used the audio files supplied by the tutorial author, or obtained from one of the numerous sites online. I am working solo, and will be for a while, so I don't want to get too wrapped up with any one skill set. Regarding audio, the files I've found and used are good for what I was doing at the time. However I would now like to try my hand at customizing the audio more. My game engine of choice is Unity and it has an audio mixer built in that I have experimented with following their tutorials. I have obtained a great book called Game Audio Development with Unity 5.x that I am working through. Half way through the book it introduces using FMOD to supplement the Unity Audio Mixer. Later in the book, the author introduces Reaper (a very popular DAW) as an external program to compose and mix music to be integrated with Unity. I did some research on DAWs and quickly became overwhelmed. Much of what I found was geared toward professional sound engineers and sound designers. I am in no way trying or even thinking about getting to that level. All I want to be able to do is take a music file, and tweak it some to get the sound I want for my game. I've played with Audacity as well, but it didn't seem to fit the bill. So that is why I am looking at a better quality DAW. Since being solo, I am also under a budget contraint. So of all the DAW software out there, I am considering Reaper or Presonus Studio One due to their pricing. My question is, is investing the time to learn about using a DAW to tweak a sound file worth it? Are there any solo developers currently using a DAW as part of their overall workflow? If so, which one? I've also come across Fabric which is a Unity plug-in that enhances the built-in audio mixer. Would that be a better alternative?
      I know this is long, and maybe I haven't communicated well in trying to be brief. But any advice from the gurus/vets would be greatly appreciated. I've leaned so much and had a lot of fun in the process. BTW, I am also a senior citizen (I cut my programming teeth back using punch cards and Structured Basic when it first came out). If anyone needs more clarification of what I am trying to accomplish please let me know.  Thanks in advance for any assistance/advice.
    • By Yosef BenSadon
      Hi , I was considering this start up http://adshir.com/, for investment and i would like a little bit of feedback on what the developers community think about the technology.
      So far what they have is a demo that runs in real time on a Tablet at over 60FPS, it runs locally on the  integrated GPU of the i7 . They have a 20 000 triangles  dinosaur that looks impressive,  better than anything i saw on a mobile device, with reflections and shadows looking very close to what they would look in the real world. They achieved this thanks to a  new algorithm of a rendering technique called Path tracing/Ray tracing, that  is very demanding and so far it is done mostly for static images.
      From what i checked around there is no real option for real time ray tracing (60 FPS on consumer devices). There was imagination technologies that were supposed to release a chip that supports real time ray tracing, but i did not found they had a product in the market or even if the technology is finished as their last demo  i found was with a PC.  The other one is OTOY with their brigade engine that is still not released and if i understand well is more a cloud solution than in hardware solution .
      Would there  be a sizable  interest in the developers community in having such a product as a plug-in for existing game engines?  How important  is Ray tracing to the  future of high end real time graphics?
    • By bryandalo
      Good day,

      I just wanted to share our casual game that is available for android.

      Description: Fight your way from the ravenous plant monster for survival through flips. The rules are simple, drag and release your phone screen. Improve your skills and show it to your friends with the games quirky ranks. Select an array of characters using the orb you acquire throughout the game.

      Download: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.HellmodeGames.FlipEscape&hl=en
       
      Trailer: 
       
    • By khawk
      Watch the latest from Unity.
       
  • Advertisement