Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Frustrum deprecated

Recommended Posts

Ignifex    520
Hi, I've been playing around with OpenGL 3.0 a bit since its release, trying to work my way around the deprecated features. I understand that the fixed pipeline was practically deprecated, so everything should be drawn using shaders. One thing I stumbled upon was the deprecated projection and modelview matrices, including the Frustrum and Translate/Rotate calls. What is now the best way to get the view transform matrix (modelview * projection) into the vertex shader? I know how to compute it myself, but having to do so wouldn't be very userfriendly. Regards, Ignifex

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
projectileman    122
I guess that they (khronos) did that because they're focusing on what the hardware does rather than support some functions that can be made on the application side.

May it's more efficient making some arithmetic calculations on the CPU than sending commands to GL.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
HuntsMan    368
Use an uniform to upload your matrices to shaders, but that probably will need to track your transformation matrices in the CPU.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
haegarr    7372
All glFrustum, glOrtho, glRotate, glTranslate, ... were likely be computed by the driver on the CPU, and only the results were pushed into the GPU.

Dropping all the predefined uniforms and attributes means to unburden GLSL and the GL API from semantics that are insufficient in some cases anyhow. E.g. what if you have to transport a 3rd color, a 2nd vertex position, or something like that? Such things happen often enough. IMHO it is a a logical step to unify the access down to generic uniforms and attributes. I'm currently implementing a graphics techniques and styles system based on shader scripts, and I would be happy if the current OpenGL would already have dropped the predefined semantics...

glRotate and friends are also mainly superflous. All projects a bit behind test projects have to implement an own co-ordinate frame system anyhow (okay, they need not really, but scan the threads here at GDnet, and you see that it is better to do that kind of stuff yourself instead of relying on OpenGL's matrix stacks). My engine currently consists of roughly 180 classes, and there is no single glTranslate or glRotate inside.

So, IMHO, it is more user friendly than user unfriendly to drop those stuff; it is just senseful to unburden the API from mainly useless stuff. That slims the API and makes it more readable and hence easier to learn. That is also a kind of user friendliness.

Just my 2 cents, of course.

EDIT: And I bet that utility libraries countervailing these "deficits" will occur in masses.

[Edited by - haegarr on August 17, 2008 10:40:40 AM]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ignifex    520
I agree that it will be better not to have the predefined uniforms and be able to fully define attributes.
As you said about the utility libraries, I'm mainly looking for the CPU implementation of gluPerspective and gluLookAt, which would return the matrix as a simple array, to be sent to the vertex shader. For now, I'll write my own implementation.

EDIT: Btw, as Carmack said, slimming the API is indeed the way to go.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ignifex    520
After a look at the source code of your library, which looks really useful, I see your glhPerspectivef function calls glFrustrum, which is now deprecated. I mean to get a 4x4 matrix in main memory, then use that as a uniform parameter for the vertex shader.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
zedz    291
heres what I have, beaware your matrix order might be different to mine

void MATRIX44::frustum( float l, float r, float b, float t, float n, float f )

// 2n r+l
// ---- 0 ----- 0
// r-l r-l

// 2n t+b
// 0 ---- ----- 0
// t-b t-b

// f+n 2fn
// 0 0 - ---- - ----
// f-n f-n

// 0 0 -1 0

a00 = (2.0*n) / (r-l);
a10 = 0.0;
a20 = 0.0;
a30 = 0.0;

a01 = 0.0;
a11 = (2.0*n) / (t-b);
a21 = 0.0;
a31 = 0.0;

a02 = (r+l) / (r-l);
a12 = (t+b) / (t-b);
a22 = -(f+n) / (f-n);
a32 = -1.0;

a03 = 0.0;
a13 = 0.0;
a23 = -(2.0*f*n) / (f-n);
a33 = 0.0;

if u check the opengl spec for the Frustum(...) command u can work out whats going on

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
V-man    813
Original post by Ignifex
After a look at the source code of your library, which looks really useful, I see your glhPerspectivef function calls glFrustrum, which is now deprecated. I mean to get a 4x4 matrix in main memory, then use that as a uniform parameter for the vertex shader.

You should do
float projectionMatrix[16];
glhPerspectivef2(projectionMatrix, fovy, aspect, znear, zfar);

and upload the matrix to your shader.

glhPerspectivef and other functions will be removed in the next version which will appear in a day or 2.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
  • Popular Now