• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL Questions

This topic is 3470 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Windows XP,OpenGL,Glut,CV++ Express I have a simple program and its running slow. I have a Nvidia Geforce 8800 GT. Does OpenGL use the graphics card or just the processor? Also I have a AMD Phenom x4 Quad core processor whats with the slow framerate? Is OpenGL OLD/outdated? If so whats better? [ Please don't wackily punctuate your topic lines. --Sneftel ] [Edited by - CobyWalkerGames on August 18, 2008 1:36:07 PM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
1) More like the GPU (graphics card) uses OpenGL
2) If it's running using OpenGL, it should not be too dependent on what type of processor you're using, since it's the GPU that's running it.
3) There really is no 'old' for OpenGL, at least the way you state it. OpenGL .000000001 would still accelerate any programs using it just fine.

FlyingIsFun1217

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:

Does OpenGL use the graphics card or just the processor?

Both, to some degree anyway. But if you do it right you can get the graphics card to do most of the work. Immediate mode places slightly higher processor overhead due to the number of function calls made, but you can still get huge framerates on simple games that way.

Quote:

Also I have a AMD Phenom x4 Quad core processor whats with the slow framerate?

That depends heavily on your program itself, not necessarily the processor. Note that if your program is single threaded, then you are limited to the speed of a single core. That said - a single core would work well for lots of games which aren't trying to squeeze every last drop from the hardware.

Quote:

Is OpenGL OLD/outdated?

Arguably, yes and no. Practically speaking, if you are using GLUT then it will probably be more than fast enough for whatever you are doing.

The slow frame rate probably has a simple answer, but we would need to see your program to diagnose the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OpenGL is an API which does not say anything about GPUs and CPUs. It's the implementation of the API that matters. There are hardware implementations and software implementations (like Mesa). If your drivers, etc are set up correctly, it should run on hardware and thus be quite fast.

If you suspect that you're not getting the performance you should, check your driver, compiler, etc setup. The problem may be in your program, too.

OpenGL is old, but not necessarily outdated. There is a lot of legacy in OpenGL, but if you use the "modern" subset (VBO's, shaders, FBO's, etc), you should be fine off. If your project is going to be Windows only, you can use DirectX instead of OpenGL. If you're on a Mac or Linux box, you have no alternatives to OpenGL.

-Riku

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by CobyWalkerGames
Windows XP,OpenGL,Glut,CV++ Express

I have a simple program and its running slow.
I have a Nvidia Geforce 8800 GT.

Does OpenGL use the graphics card or just the processor?

Also I have a AMD Phenom x4 Quad core processor whats with the slow framerate?

Is OpenGL OLD/outdated? If so whats better?


[ Please don't wackily punctuate your topic lines. --Sneftel ]


You issue is most like due to something in your system or in your code, you might not have graphics drivers installed, or getting a software only opengl context, or hit a software fallback within your driver.

Anyway, you need to post the relevant code and your own definition of "running slow" to be able to deduce the problem and the solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by CobyWalkerGames
Windows XP,OpenGL,Glut,CV++ Express

I have a simple program and its running slow.
I have a Nvidia Geforce 8800 GT.

Does OpenGL use the graphics card or just the processor?

Also I have a AMD Phenom x4 Quad core processor whats with the slow framerate?

Is OpenGL OLD/outdated? If so whats better?


[ Please don't wackily punctuate your topic lines. --Sneftel ]


There is no way to know what is wrong without knowing what you are trying to do, and we need code to look at. For all I know you are trying to do immediate mode and render 10 million polygons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Go here:
http://www.videotutorialsrock.com/opengl_tutorial/collision_detection/video.php

Click:
"Download source code"

When Running:
Press "Space bar" 10 times

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by CobyWalkerGames
Go here:
http://www.videotutorialsrock.com/opengl_tutorial/collision_detection/video.php

Click:
"Download source code"

When Running:
Press "Space bar" 10 times


Runs fine here, GeForce 8400GS + ArchLinux, but just looking at the source code, as pointed some posts up, is using immediate mode to draw, which can be a CPU bottleneck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
    • By Andrey OGL_D3D
      Hi all!
      I try to use the Sun shafts effects via post process in my 3DEngine, but i have some artefacts on final image(Please see attached images).
      The effect contains the following passes:
      1) Depth scene pass;
      2) "Shafts pass" Using DepthPass Texture + RGBA BackBuffer texture.
      3) Shafts pass texture +  RGBA BackBuffer texture.
      Shafts shader for 2 pass:
      // uniform sampler2D FullSampler; // RGBA Back Buffer uniform sampler2D DepthSampler; varying vec2 tex; #ifndef saturate float saturate(float val) {     return clamp(val, 0.0, 1.0); } #endif void main(void) {     vec2 uv = tex;     float sceneDepth = texture2D(DepthSampler, uv.xy).r;     vec4  scene        = texture2D(FullSampler, tex);     float fShaftsMask     = (1.0 - sceneDepth);     gl_FragColor = vec4( scene.xyz * saturate(sceneDepth), fShaftsMask ); } final shader:
      // uniform sampler2D FullSampler; // RGBA Back Buffer uniform sampler2D BlurSampler; // shafts sampler varying vec4 Sun_pos; const vec4    ShaftParams = vec4(0.1,2.0,0.1,2.0); varying vec2 Tex_UV; #ifndef saturate  float saturate(float val) {     return clamp(val, 0.0, 1.0); } #endif vec4 blendSoftLight(vec4 a, vec4 b) {   vec4 c = 2.0 * a * b + a * a * (1.0 - 2.0 * b);   vec4 d = sqrt(a) * (2.0 * b - 1.0) + 2.0 * a * (1.0 - b);       // TODO: To look in Crysis what it the shit???   //return ( b < 0.5 )? c : d;   return any(lessThan(b, vec4(0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5)))? c : d; } void main(void) {     vec4 sun_pos = Sun_pos;     vec2    sunPosProj = sun_pos.xy;     //float    sign = sun_pos.w;     float    sign = 1.0;     vec2    sunVec = sunPosProj.xy - (Tex_UV.xy - vec2(0.5, 0.5));     float    sunDist = saturate(sign) * saturate( 1.0 - saturate(length(sunVec) * ShaftParams.y ));     sunVec *= ShaftParams.x * sign;     vec4 accum;     vec2 tc = Tex_UV.xy;     tc += sunVec;     accum = texture2D(BlurSampler, tc);     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.875;     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.75;     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.625;     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.5;     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.375;     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.25;     tc += sunVec;     accum += texture2D(BlurSampler, tc) * 0.125;     accum  *= 0.25 * vec4(sunDist, sunDist, sunDist, 1.0);           accum.w += 1.0 - saturate(saturate(sign * 0.1 + 0.9));     vec4    cScreen = texture2D(FullSampler, Tex_UV.xy);           vec4    cSunShafts = accum;     float fShaftsMask = saturate(1.00001 - cSunShafts.w) * ShaftParams.z * 2.0;              float fBlend = cSunShafts.w;     vec4 sunColor = vec4(0.9, 0.8, 0.6, 1.0);     accum =  cScreen + cSunShafts.xyzz * ShaftParams.w * sunColor * (1.0 - cScreen);     accum = blendSoftLight(accum, sunColor * fShaftsMask * 0.5 + 0.5);     gl_FragColor = accum; } Demo project:
      Demo Project
      Shaders for postprocess Shaders/SunShaft/
      What i do wrong ?
      Thanks!
       


  • Advertisement