• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL How to check in my graphics card...?

This topic is 3378 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi, i'm programming an application in GLSL/OpenGL and i need to check if my graphics supports any resolution or if only supports width/height values as power of 2. How can i check this? I google searched it but i didn't found the answer... Sorry for the basic question :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
Texture resolution or screen resolution?

If you mean screen resolution, this is done through your operating system, or if you mean textures, you can get it with this:


int gl_max_texture_size;
glGetIntegerv( GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE, &gl_max_texture_size );

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm pretty sure most modern graphics cards only support textures with power of 2 sizes mainly because it means they can do a lot of optimisations.

Screen resolution is usually 16:9, 16:10 or 4:3 ratios, there is nothing to stop you creating a window of any width/height though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Malal
I'm pretty sure most modern graphics cards only support textures with power of 2 sizes mainly because it means they can do a lot of optimisations.

Screen resolution is usually 16:9, 16:10 or 4:3 ratios, there is nothing to stop you creating a window of any width/height though.

If ARB_texture_non_power_of_two is supported, you can use textures of any dimensions (as long as they're below the max size samster581 posted) and they'll work just fine.

IIRC "proper" video cards have supported this for several years (back to nVidia's FX6xxx, and ATi's equivilent), not sure about those crappy intel chips though.

[Edited by - OrangyTang on November 19, 2008 11:49:06 AM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by samster581
Texture resolution or screen resolution?

If you mean screen resolution, this is done through your operating system, or if you mean textures, you can get it with this:


int gl_max_texture_size;
glGetIntegerv( GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE, &gl_max_texture_size );


I forgot to specify that.. sorry :S

I was referring texture resolutions the graphics card supports.

I did what you suggest and it gave me the value of 1244396. This means i can use any texture resolution?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ARB_texture_non_power_of_two has promoted to core since opengl 2.0.
From the OpenGL 2.0 Specification:
Quote:

I.3 Non-Power-Of-Two Textures


The restriction of textures to power-of-two dimensions has been relaxed for all texture targets, so that non-power-of-two textures may be specified without generating errors. Non-power-of-two textures was promoted from the ARB_texture_non_power_of_two extension.


Thus you can use non-power-of-two textures in opengl 2.0 or higher (check glGetString(GL_VERSION) ) or if ARB_texture_non_power_of_two is supported (GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two is included in the string returned glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS) ).


Quote:
Original post by hayden
I did what you suggest and it gave me the value of 1244396. This means i can use any texture resolution?


1) You should call glGetIntegerv after creating a valid opengl context, 1244396 is strange value, the max texture size is more likely something like 2048, 4096 or 8192.

2) No, Max texture size just tells you that the texture can not be larger than the maximum size in each dimension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by OrangyTang
IIRC "proper" video cards have supported this for several years (back to nVidia's FX5200, and ATi's equivilent), not sure about those crappy intel chips though.
My Intel X3100 works fine with non-power-of-2, even with the ghastly Apple drivers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by OrangyTang
IIRC "proper" video cards have supported this for several years (back to nVidia's FX5200, and ATi's equivilent), not sure about those crappy intel chips though.


Actually it started at the GeForce 6, on ATI i'm not pretty sure it started before the HD series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by hayden
I did what you suggest and it gave me the value of 1244396. This means i can use any texture resolution?


No, that can't be correct. You either got garbage back or you're not printing out the text correctly. You pass the address of an integer variable to that function.
You should get back a nice number like 1024, 2048 or 4096.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by HuntsMan
Quote:
Original post by OrangyTang
IIRC "proper" video cards have supported this for several years (back to nVidia's FX5200, and ATi's equivilent), not sure about those crappy intel chips though.


Actually it started at the GeForce 6, on ATI i'm not pretty sure it started before the HD series.

Oops, you're right thanks. Fixed.

Side note: Delphi3d.net used to be great for checking these things but it's vanished sometime in the last year, does anyone know of a good replacement?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for all of your replies :)
The 1244396 value was garbage, my bad... Now i'm having a max texture size of 8192.

Quote:
Original post by Kambiz
ARB_texture_non_power_of_two has promoted to core since opengl 2.0.
From the OpenGL 2.0 Specification:
Quote:

I.3 Non-Power-Of-Two Textures


The restriction of textures to power-of-two dimensions has been relaxed for all texture targets, so that non-power-of-two textures may be specified without generating errors. Non-power-of-two textures was promoted from the ARB_texture_non_power_of_two extension.


Thus you can use non-power-of-two textures in opengl 2.0 or higher (check glGetString(GL_VERSION) ) or if ARB_texture_non_power_of_two is supported (GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two is included in the string returned glGetString(GL_EXTENSIONS) ).


Quote:
Original post by hayden
I did what you suggest and it gave me the value of 1244396. This means i can use any texture resolution?


1) You should call glGetIntegerv after creating a valid opengl context, 1244396 is strange value, the max texture size is more likely something like 2048, 4096 or 8192.

2) No, Max texture size just tells you that the texture can not be larger than the maximum size in each dimension.

Now i get it, with the info you pointed here :) thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement