• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

gph-gw

Physics part

8 posts in this topic

If you toss a tennis ball up in the air, neglecting air resistance, but it didn''t go straight up. It went off to the side, so when it came down, it''s path was an upside down U. Two questions: ___ / \ / \ / \0<- ball goes up, then down A. Is the ball''s path vertically symetric at the highest point? B. Suppose the ball had air resistance..it''s path would be similar(as in geometry), but not congruent. Thanks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A. If you mean if you drew a line at the top of the path to the ground, would both sides be the same, just flipped over, then yes. A ball thrown up like that forms a parabola, not an upside-down U

B. Err, yes, no, maybe. Depends on how strong the wind is and which way it''s blowing. In most cases, the path the ball follows is similarly shaped to the path it would''ve followed if there was no wind.

Hope that helps a little.



"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of the dreams."
- Willy Wonka
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Part B of your question is a vector and magnitude issue. As BitBlt said, it depends not only on the magnitude of the wind, but also on the direction the wind is blowing form. For part A, it is symmetric, and forms a parabola like BitBlt stated.

Edem Attiogbe
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...and to extend the realities of Part B in your question, when you add air, you may also want to consider other things like Magnus forces caused by the ball''s surface friction with the air.

If you''re unfamiliar with Magnus forces (and I DON''T want to hear any X-Men jokes ) then you just need to watch a good baseball pitcher or read an article about baseball pitching. They almost always try to explain the effect of object spin on an object path when they discuss the slider or breaking-ball.

---------------
-WarMage
...gravity is Universe''s way of trying to tell you that spandex is BAD...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by WarMage
...and to extend the realities of Part B in your question, when you add air, you may also want to consider other things like Magnus forces caused by the ball''s surface friction with the air.



(This response may be becoming over-the-top but gph-gw and others may find it useful.)

Yes, this can add to the realism for good benefit (especially in a sports game) with a little additional computational expense. Magnus force is really the same thing as lift, and it is caused by pressure differences due to air circulation, which is generated as a result of the surface friction WarMage mentioned. I wish I could draw a picture... I''ll give you a secret equation for calculating an estimate of the lift/magnus force on a spinning baseball. It is called the Kutta-Joukowski theorem. Actually, this equation shows up during the derivation of the theorem:

lift force (a vector) = rho * circ * diam * (U cross e)

Here, rho is the scalar air density, U is the velocity vector of the wind---relative to the ball''s center of mass, e is a unit vector indicating the direction of ball rotation, diam is the diameter of the ball, and circ is scalar air circulation given by:

circ = pi * diam * rotational_velocity

where pi is, you know, and rotational_velocity is the magnitude of the rotational velocity of the ball in radians/unit time.

The drag force could also be considered, and it can be estimated as:

drag force magnitude = 0.5 * rho * (U dot U) * CD * Sref

where CD is the drag coefficient (choose CD = 0.5 for a tennis ball----a quick-and-dirty estimate) and Sref is a reference area, use Sref = pi * radius * radius for a spherical ball.

drag force acts in the direction of U and should be added to lift force to estimate the complete aerodynamic force.

As always, make sure your units are consistent!



Graham Rhodes
Senior Scientist
Applied Research Associates, Inc.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good stuff man, good stuff. I knew this forum would be kewl.



"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of the dreams."
- Willy Wonka
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think it would be better to just use simple parabolas. Very few players would actually notice....
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, but still for the sake of realism, you want all of your playerbase to have a good experience with your game. So having one group notice isn't a good thing because even though you are losing a small amount of your playerbase, it's too large to risk. So I'd opt to use a bit more technology and make your game stand out from the rest that "just use simple parabolas".

Edited by - Erlog on June 21, 2001 2:47:57 AM
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by gph-gw
I think it would be better to just use simple parabolas. Very few players would actually notice....


Perhaps you are right, for some games such as a tennis game. And most casual players of ball games might not notice or care. I would think that hardcore baseball fans (for example) would definitely notice and appreciate the inclusion of the effects of ball spinning, given that pitchers use spinning as a strategy for pitching strikes. I know my brother, who is a hardcore baseball fan and player of baseball video games, would. Hardcore players include many of the 12-13 year old kids who play these games---they notice all the details, as I''ve observed while talking to the teenage son of a co-worker, and his son''s friends.



Graham Rhodes
Senior Scientist
Applied Research Associates, Inc.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites