• Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By fleissi
      Hey guys!

      I'm new here and I recently started developing my own rendering engine. It's open source, based on OpenGL/DirectX and C++.
      The full source code is hosted on github:

      I would appreciate if people with experience in game development / engine desgin could take a look at my source code. I'm looking for honest, constructive criticism on how to improve the engine.
      I'm currently writing my master's thesis in computer science and in the recent year I've gone through all the basics about graphics programming, learned DirectX and OpenGL, read some articles on Nvidia GPU Gems, read books and integrated some of this stuff step by step into the engine.

      I know about the basics, but I feel like there is some missing link that I didn't get yet to merge all those little pieces together.

      Features I have so far:
      - Dynamic shader generation based on material properties
      - Dynamic sorting of meshes to be renderd based on shader and material
      - Rendering large amounts of static meshes
      - Hierarchical culling (detail + view frustum)
      - Limited support for dynamic (i.e. moving) meshes
      - Normal, Parallax and Relief Mapping implementations
      - Wind animations based on vertex displacement
      - A very basic integration of the Bullet physics engine
      - Procedural Grass generation
      - Some post processing effects (Depth of Field, Light Volumes, Screen Space Reflections, God Rays)
      - Caching mechanisms for textures, shaders, materials and meshes

      Features I would like to have:
      - Global illumination methods
      - Scalable physics
      - Occlusion culling
      - A nice procedural terrain generator
      - Scripting
      - Level Editing
      - Sound system
      - Optimization techniques

      Books I have so far:
      - Real-Time Rendering Third Edition
      - 3D Game Programming with DirectX 11
      - Vulkan Cookbook (not started yet)

      I hope you guys can take a look at my source code and if you're really motivated, feel free to contribute :-)
      There are some videos on youtube that demonstrate some of the features:
      Procedural grass on the GPU
      Procedural Terrain Engine
      Quadtree detail and view frustum culling

      The long term goal is to turn this into a commercial game engine. I'm aware that this is a very ambitious goal, but I'm sure it's possible if you work hard for it.


    • By tj8146
      I have attached my project in a .zip file if you wish to run it for yourself.
      I am making a simple 2d top-down game and I am trying to run my code to see if my window creation is working and to see if my timer is also working with it. Every time I run it though I get errors. And when I fix those errors, more come, then the same errors keep appearing. I end up just going round in circles.  Is there anyone who could help with this? 
      Errors when I build my code:
      1>Renderer.cpp 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.h(15): error C2039: 'string': is not a member of 'std' 1>c:\program files (x86)\windows kits\10\include\10.0.16299.0\ucrt\stddef.h(18): note: see declaration of 'std' 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.h(15): error C2061: syntax error: identifier 'string' 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.cpp(28): error C2511: 'bool Game::Rendering::initialize(int,int,bool,std::string)': overloaded member function not found in 'Game::Rendering' 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.h(9): note: see declaration of 'Game::Rendering' 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.cpp(35): error C2597: illegal reference to non-static member 'Game::Rendering::window' 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.cpp(36): error C2597: illegal reference to non-static member 'Game::Rendering::window' 1>c:\users\documents\opengl\game\game\renderer.cpp(43): error C2597: illegal reference to non-static member 'Game::Rendering::window' 1>Done building project "Game.vcxproj" -- FAILED. ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========  
      #include <GL/glew.h> #include <GLFW/glfw3.h> #include "Renderer.h" #include "Timer.h" #include <iostream> namespace Game { GLFWwindow* window; /* Initialize the library */ Rendering::Rendering() { mClock = new Clock; } Rendering::~Rendering() { shutdown(); } bool Rendering::initialize(uint width, uint height, bool fullscreen, std::string window_title) { if (!glfwInit()) { return -1; } /* Create a windowed mode window and its OpenGL context */ window = glfwCreateWindow(640, 480, "Hello World", NULL, NULL); if (!window) { glfwTerminate(); return -1; } /* Make the window's context current */ glfwMakeContextCurrent(window); glViewport(0, 0, (GLsizei)width, (GLsizei)height); glOrtho(0, (GLsizei)width, (GLsizei)height, 0, 1, -1); glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION); glLoadIdentity(); glfwSwapInterval(1); glEnable(GL_SMOOTH); glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST); glEnable(GL_BLEND); glDepthFunc(GL_LEQUAL); glHint(GL_PERSPECTIVE_CORRECTION_HINT, GL_NICEST); glEnable(GL_TEXTURE_2D); glLoadIdentity(); return true; } bool Rendering::render() { /* Loop until the user closes the window */ if (!glfwWindowShouldClose(window)) return false; /* Render here */ mClock->reset(); glfwPollEvents(); if (mClock->step()) { glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT); glfwSwapBuffers(window); mClock->update(); } return true; } void Rendering::shutdown() { glfwDestroyWindow(window); glfwTerminate(); } GLFWwindow* Rendering::getCurrentWindow() { return window; } } Renderer.h
      #pragma once namespace Game { class Clock; class Rendering { public: Rendering(); ~Rendering(); bool initialize(uint width, uint height, bool fullscreen, std::string window_title = "Rendering window"); void shutdown(); bool render(); GLFWwindow* getCurrentWindow(); private: GLFWwindow * window; Clock* mClock; }; } Timer.cpp
      #include <GL/glew.h> #include <GLFW/glfw3.h> #include <time.h> #include "Timer.h" namespace Game { Clock::Clock() : mTicksPerSecond(50), mSkipTics(1000 / mTicksPerSecond), mMaxFrameSkip(10), mLoops(0) { mLastTick = tick(); } Clock::~Clock() { } bool Clock::step() { if (tick() > mLastTick && mLoops < mMaxFrameSkip) return true; return false; } void Clock::reset() { mLoops = 0; } void Clock::update() { mLastTick += mSkipTics; mLoops++; } clock_t Clock::tick() { return clock(); } } TImer.h
      #pragma once #include "Common.h" namespace Game { class Clock { public: Clock(); ~Clock(); void update(); bool step(); void reset(); clock_t tick(); private: uint mTicksPerSecond; ufloat mSkipTics; uint mMaxFrameSkip; uint mLoops; uint mLastTick; }; } Common.h
      #pragma once #include <cstdio> #include <cstdlib> #include <ctime> #include <cstring> #include <cmath> #include <iostream> namespace Game { typedef unsigned char uchar; typedef unsigned short ushort; typedef unsigned int uint; typedef unsigned long ulong; typedef float ufloat; }  
    • By lxjk
      Hi guys,
      There are many ways to do light culling in tile-based shading. I've been playing with this idea for a while, and just want to throw it out there.
      Because tile frustums are general small compared to light radius, I tried using cone test to reduce false positives introduced by commonly used sphere-frustum test.
      On top of that, I use distance to camera rather than depth for near/far test (aka. sliced by spheres).
      This method can be naturally extended to clustered light culling as well.
      The following image shows the general ideas

      Performance-wise I get around 15% improvement over sphere-frustum test. You can also see how a single light performs as the following: from left to right (1) standard rendering of a point light; then tiles passed the test of (2) sphere-frustum test; (3) cone test; (4) spherical-sliced cone test

      I put the details in my blog post (https://lxjk.github.io/2018/03/25/Improve-Tile-based-Light-Culling-with-Spherical-sliced-Cone.html), GLSL source code included!
    • By Fadey Duh
      Good evening everyone!

      I was wondering if there is something equivalent of  GL_NV_blend_equation_advanced for AMD?
      Basically I'm trying to find more compatible version of it.

      Thank you!
    • By Jens Eckervogt
      Hello guys, 
      Please tell me! 
      How do I know? Why does wavefront not show for me?
      I already checked I have non errors yet.
      using OpenTK; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Text; namespace Tutorial_08.net.sourceskyboxer { public class WaveFrontLoader { private static List<Vector3> inPositions; private static List<Vector2> inTexcoords; private static List<Vector3> inNormals; private static List<float> positions; private static List<float> texcoords; private static List<int> indices; public static RawModel LoadObjModel(string filename, Loader loader) { inPositions = new List<Vector3>(); inTexcoords = new List<Vector2>(); inNormals = new List<Vector3>(); positions = new List<float>(); texcoords = new List<float>(); indices = new List<int>(); int nextIdx = 0; using (var reader = new StreamReader(File.Open("Contents/" + filename + ".obj", FileMode.Open), Encoding.UTF8)) { string line = reader.ReadLine(); int i = reader.Read(); while (true) { string[] currentLine = line.Split(); if (currentLine[0] == "v") { Vector3 pos = new Vector3(float.Parse(currentLine[1]), float.Parse(currentLine[2]), float.Parse(currentLine[3])); inPositions.Add(pos); if (currentLine[1] == "t") { Vector2 tex = new Vector2(float.Parse(currentLine[1]), float.Parse(currentLine[2])); inTexcoords.Add(tex); } if (currentLine[1] == "n") { Vector3 nom = new Vector3(float.Parse(currentLine[1]), float.Parse(currentLine[2]), float.Parse(currentLine[3])); inNormals.Add(nom); } } if (currentLine[0] == "f") { Vector3 pos = inPositions[0]; positions.Add(pos.X); positions.Add(pos.Y); positions.Add(pos.Z); Vector2 tc = inTexcoords[0]; texcoords.Add(tc.X); texcoords.Add(tc.Y); indices.Add(nextIdx); ++nextIdx; } reader.Close(); return loader.loadToVAO(positions.ToArray(), texcoords.ToArray(), indices.ToArray()); } } } } } And It have tried other method but it can't show for me.  I am mad now. Because any OpenTK developers won't help me.
      Please help me how do I fix.

      And my download (mega.nz) should it is original but I tried no success...
      - Add blend source and png file here I have tried tried,.....  
      PS: Why is our community not active? I wait very longer. Stop to lie me!
      Thanks !
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL SDL (.NET) & Hardware Acceleration

This topic is 3384 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm making a simple 2D representation of a game (at some point I'd like to make it 3D), and as it gets more complex I'm going to be needing a bit more smoothness when it comes to that representation. I had a look at SDL and found SDL.NET since I'm using C# .NET. Now, am I right in assuming that SDL will allow smoother animations than GDI+ (what I'm currently using)? I understand that it uses OpenGL for hardware-accelerated 3D graphics, but what about with 2D? I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to graphics, so that probably is a stupid question, but there you go. It's certainly a better way to animate a 2D game than using GDI+, anyway, right?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah I wouldn't recommend GDI+, it's generally too slow for animations. Honestly I'm not sure whether the current version of SDL still supports hardware acceleration for 2D...I know it used to but it's been a long time since I kept tabs on the project.

You might want to consider checking out XNA though...the framework is very robust with a lot of neat and useful features (not to mention a ton of [tutorials and samples as well as starter kits) that I don't think SDL can really compare with.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi MJP, thanks for the suggestion :)

Well, I'd quite like to do something with 2D Graphics which doesn't take a huge amount of time to learn*, because I find Direct3D stuff to be quite a lot more time-consuming to get one's head around, what with that irritating extra dimension.

XNA is very intriguing though. Developing for the 360 as well as the PC would certainly add a bit of flair to the process.

Having said that, XNA doesn't make it too easy does it? I don't want to end up with a graphics system which is identical to every other game developed with XNA out there.

Furthermore I'm making an RTS, the mechanics of which I'm building from the ground-up. It's not as simple as saying Game rts = new RTSGame(); is it?

* At university, and unfortunately this stuff doesn't really line up with what they want to teach me - therefore time is limited, but I still want to make something fun =(

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well the nice thing about XNA is that it has some really useful and convenient components like the Game class, the GraphicsDeviceManager, and the Content Pipeline, but they're all 100% optional. If you do decide to use them, they can help you get going quickly and are flexible enough to handle non-trivial games. But if you want to ditch them all, you can just go straight for the stuff in the Graphics class which isn't much more than a wrapper around D3D9 (on the PC, anyway). So if you decide to make something like say a map editor, you can skip the Game class and just make a WinForms app that uses an XNA GraphicsDevice to do the drawing.

As far as 2D goes, you have the SpriteBatch class which is typically all you need. It lets you draw sprites and specify the position, rotation, scale, and even a color to modulate with it. It also handles the drawing in a efficient manner (by batching multiple sprites together when it can). If you're using this then your game's "look" is going to be completely defined by your artwork, so it'll be as unique as you want it to be. Then if you do decide to get into 3D stuff at some point, you can do whatever you can do with Direct3D/OpenGL.

For an RTS game specifically, of course there's not going to be something available specifically for that. However the components available are meant to be useful for any time of game. For instance the Game class creates a window for you, manages it, and manages a game loop: this is stuff any game can use. Same for the Content Pipeline, which is a method for importing things like images and models and then processing them to get them into format useful for your game.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I suppose it wouldn't hurt to try out the Game class then - currently I'm just using a timer to do the loop, which I've heard is a pretty antiquated method of doing it, there must be more to it than that.

I downloaded XNA and had a play around with some of the samples. I like the way primitives work in this, but I suppose for a 2D game, sprites would be better as you say. Though, I was hoping most of the units would be built out of vectors so perhaps I will try that instead. In the meantime I am just trying to figure out how to get anti-aliasing to work - I've set the parameters but it's not liking it :P

Thanks for the advice MJP :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks MJP! I think I figured out my problem though - is it just me, or is there no -official- way to draw a polygon out in XNA, in the same way that there is in GDI+? For 2D, you need to use sprites generally, right? So what if I want to just draw one point to another, to another and so on, like the DrawPolygon method in GDI?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
No, there's no way to just draw a polygon from a list of points like you could in GDI+. This is because the graphcis API is meant to to be a more low-level and direct way of talking to the graphics hardware, and so you pretty much have to do everything with either lines or triangles. Unfortunately it's the price you pay for vastly improved performance.

There is a "How To" section on drawing points, lines, and triangles that you might find useful.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well I suppose it does allow things to be tailored directly to my needs. I'll give it a shot, thanks again MJP - you've been a great help :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement