Sign in to follow this  
spek

OpenGL Loading textures in the background

Recommended Posts

Hi, Question about loading/creating OpenGL objects such as textures and compiling Cg Shaders. Normally I would create them inside the rendering loop, no problemo. But now I have another thread that loads the world/textures in the background. Loading an image into an array of colors is simple. But when I'll try to create a GL texture and send the data, it fails. when trying to compile shaders, I get errors as well. I guess this is because I call these functions from another thread, outside the normal rendering loop. Anyhow, how to deal with this? I'd like to prevent loading times, that's why I created a background thread for reading files and eventually creating the textures, if possible. Greetings, Rick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, I don't know if the OpenGL context can be accessed by a thread other than the one that created it (AFAIK this was something OpenGL 3.0 was meant to address).

But you could share the data loaded from disk between your threads. Why not load the data in one thread and upload it to OpenGL in your render thread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok. That clarifies the problem. Loading the image from disk is still possible. The shaders can all be loaded at the start of the program maybe.

Then we still have the texture uploading part. How slow/fast is this? While walking around, it regulary happens a couple of textures need to be loaded/unloaded. And ussually each texture also has variants such as normalMaps. How to upload, for example, 8 MB texture data 'quietly'?

Thanks for the info!
Rick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've experimented with that before actually. I created a blank OpenGL texture object with the same dimensions as the texture I wanted to load.

I'd load the image in a separate thread. Then, every frame, I'd copy just a small chunk of the image data to the OpenGL texture with the GL image operation functions. It usually wasn't enough to noticeably effect performance, but it did take quite a while to load the texture, so that might not be your best bet if you need them on the fly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have some loading time available since most of the new loaded parts are not directly visible yet. But aren't there other ways? I mean GTA already managed it on old hardware, and streaming gets more and more used nowadays...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you actually tried just glTex(Sub)Image'ing the data and profiling that? Uploading a few MB of texture data occasionally should work fine.

If that isn't fast enough for you, it is conceivable that writing the data into a mapped PBO from the loading thread and then unmapping/uploading from the main thread is faster. Finally, as long as you have multiple smaller textures and not one huge texture, try balancing the uploads over several frames.

But again, before you do any of this, just try the simple and stupid method. From your post it seems you haven't done that yet, and it might just be fast enough for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Didn't try indeed :) Well, the main question was howto upload textures in the background. But as far as I understand, only the main rendering loop can do the uploading. I want to prevent framerate drops/'hanging' as much as possible, so I thought maybe there were some other tricks.

Textures sizes can vary quit alot in my case. 512x512 or 1024x1024 is possible as well. I could start with loading 1 texture per frame, or after each x frames maybe. Ussually each texture also has 1 or 2 other variants (normalMap/specularMap/somethingelseMap), and some of them might need mipmaps as well. Is it smarter to create those mip-maps manually maybe? Well, I guess I should just try and look how slow or fast it goes. I was afraid uploading a bigger chunk of data would cause a noticeable drop.

Greetings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi again,

First I'll try the traditional way of uploading textures like Prefect suggested. But while coding I read some more about PBO's. I'm not sure if they can actually help me though. So far the streaming is made of the following steps:
1.- texture gets requested, load file into RAM
2.- In OpenGL context, transfer RAM to texture
3.- Free RAM

As far as I understand, the PBO can be used to send pixeldata quickly (without stalling the CPU) to the video mem. However, this PBO needs to be build in the first place as well. According to the model above, I would need to create a PBO each time a texture is loaded:
>> file -> RAM -> PBO -> Video Mem.

When I read some threads about this, this seems to work actually slower, because that PBO needs to be build as well, right? I could create a PBO for each and every texture. But where is the PBO actually stored, in the RAM or video Mem? I might end up with hundreds MB of image data... When does a PBO benefit? I have 2 other lightMaps that must be changed by the CPU several times a second, maybe its of good use here.

Greetings,
Rick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
you can use wglShareLists £¬make two context created from different context share same list£¬such as text make£¬buffer object id£¬display list...

see msdn...

wglShareLists
The wglShareLists function enables multiple OpenGL rendering contexts to share a single display-list space.

BOOL wglShareLists(
HGLRC hglrc1, // OpenGL rendering context with which to share
// display lists
HGLRC hglrc2 // OpenGL rendering context to share display lists
);

Remarks
When you create an OpenGL rendering context, it has its own display-list space. The wglShareLists function enables a rendering context to share the display-list space of another rendering context; any number of rendering contexts can share a single display-list space. Once a rendering context shares a display-list space, the rendering context always uses the display-list space until the rendering context is deleted. When the last rendering context of a shared display-list space is deleted, the shared display-list space is deleted. All the indexes and definitions of display lists in a shared display-list space are shared.

You can only share display lists with rendering contexts within the same process. However, not all rendering contexts in a process can share display lists. Rendering contexts can share display lists only if they use the same implementation of OpenGL functions. All client rendering contexts of a given pixel format can always share display lists.

All rendering contexts of a shared display list must use an identical pixel format. Otherwise the results depend on the implementation of OpenGL used.

Note The wglShareLists function is only available with OpenGL version 1.01 or later. To determine the version number of the implementation of OpenGL, call glGetString.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628344
    • Total Posts
      2982186
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now