This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


OpenGL quick simple OpenGL question...

Recommended Posts

Well, im pretty new to C++ in general, and im learning quite a bit. IN the future, I plan to get into OpenGL, instead of DirectX. So, since now I only can do console C++ programming, OpenGL doesn''t work in console mode does it? I know GLUT does, but not OpenGL right? If so, where can I find some tutorials about basic Windows based programming? thanks a bunch.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Don''t forget that "DirectX" refers to all of the Direct* APIs: DirectDraw, Direct3D, DirectSound, etc. Sorry to be so nitpicky, but sometimes this causes some serious confusion.

You probably already know this, but GLUT is a framework to make an OpenGL app without worrying about platform-specific issues such as window creation and input. That''s all it does. To do any drawing, you use OpenGL commands.

A console app can use OpenGL. If you use GLUT, you''re technically creating a console app. This is because GLUT does all of the window stuff itself, so making your GLUT app a windowed app might conflict with its use. Console apps can''t draw graphics in the console itself, so they create a separate window. Of course, you don''t need GLUT to create a window and all of that, but it''s lots easier. =)

So...tutorials on basic Windows programming, eh? Well, unfortunately, there isn''t lots of good info out there on that sort of thing anymore; I assume you''re talking about using the raw Win32 API as most game programmers do, as opposed to MFC. Most stuff out there in on MFC. There''s one site on the net with a few tutorials, but I forget the address. Check around in these forums for the link. But you won''t get very far with that, and there''s not much else, so you''ll just have to spend some time with it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
MFC is Microsoft''s poorly made OO wrapper for the Win32 API. Don''t use it for games. See for some Win32 tutorials. It doesn''t cover everything, but it''ll get you started.

You can also use SDL (as a more game oriented alternative to GLUT) to do the platform specific Window setup and stuff.

[Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Once upon a time, Satan wanted to program something and see what this computer hype was about. When he was finished, he called it MFC and released it to the world under his human-alias, Bill Gates.

MFC makes windows programming easier by adding an extra layer over the real API but it gives you less control and isnt as flexable. Basically, for games its not an option.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well it depends on the type of game. You are not going to make Quake 4 using MFC but you could certainly make a cool boardgame or turn-based strategy game using MFC.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
hey check my website and try my first two opengl tutorials.
they are both about using the WinAPI, the first one is VERY basic. I will make others pretty soon too if some people out there actually think they are worth it =)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now