Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OpenGL How many use OpenGL?

This topic is 6046 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I think you missed a "not"
Generally, 3D games is not programmed by Direct3D...

Most 3D games sold are not for Windows. Another thing to remember is that over 90% of the commercial game projects that is using Direct3D is losing money.

To be honest do I think that a discussion like this is pointless. What you can do should be more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think OpenGL is much better than Direct3D and we all should support it! M$ has enough money and we must stop them to control everything of the pc market!

The only thing which is better in D3D is D3DX and it''s helper functions for vertices,matrices and so on.... we should create such a thing for OpenGL..or is there something similar?? Don''t know...

...OpenGL 1.3...I think we all know why M$ stops releasing new OpenGL versions for Win.

Bye,
NoMoRe@

www.notatric.de

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree M$ is not the kind of firm I want to support, and I use OpenGL to release a game on many platforms at once.
(Linux, BeOS, Windows [money guys], maybe MacOS and freeBSD)

About D3DX I think it''s called glu in OpenGL :p

There''s also GLUT at a higher level.

-* So many things to do, so little time to spend. *-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I''m porting my engine to SDL+OpenGL right now (from the Win32 API and XLib). After I''m done it''ll be readilly compilable on Linux, Win32, BeOS, MacOS, Solaris, IRIX, and FreeBSD. All without changing a thing. The joys of OpenGL . The only annoying thing is dealing with the different directory structures in each OS, but that''s not too bad (I found a way around that).

[Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thing with SDL is by the license agreement you''re required to release your source code if you use it. If you''re making something open source that''s fine but if you want to release something commercial and don''t want to release your code, then I wouldn''t use SDL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Obelix
Most 3D games sold are not for Windows



?

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Edited by - Martee on June 26, 2001 7:05:03 PM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t use OpenGL, not at all. Nope, not me.

Anyhoo, I sure hope this won''t turn into a Direct3D vs. OpenGL flame war, cuz I''d have to take out my big shiny sword on this thread (wink wink nudge nudge), so keep it civilized.

------------------------------
Trent (ShiningKnight)
E-mail me
OpenGL Game Programming Tutorials

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>>quote:
Original post by Obelix
Most 3D games sold are not for Windows
?
<<
consoles

i believe the latest sales figures show less than 15% of games sold in 2000 were for pc''s.

http://members.xoom.com/myBollux

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... which is fine, except that this thread is about OGL vs. D3D ... and most consoles DON''T use OpenGL. So I fail to see what Obelix''s point is.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let''s see : Sony PS2, Nintendo GameCube and (rumors)the Xbox have an OpenGL implementation...

Guess what, I think you can use OpenGL on consoles.
Also you can use it on windows if you wish and you can use it for your favorite OS probably.

Cross dev for console, PCs in a single API that''s good
(of course you''ll have to change things a bit, but not that much)


And to answer the first question :
Noone is using OpenGL, see there''s no questions about OpenGL in this board, and John Carmack isn''t coding DOOMIII using almost every GeForce3 capabilities.

-* So many things to do, so little time to spend. *-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Supernova
The thing with SDL is by the license agreement you''re required to release your source code if you use it. If you''re making something open source that''s fine but if you want to release something commercial and don''t want to release your code, then I wouldn''t use SDL.


Sorry, but that is a misconception. SDL is under the LGPL and not under the GPL. This means, you only have to release your sourcecode if you mix your sourcecode with theirs. Use their sourcecode for your own purposes, and link with SDL dynamically and you should be fine.

To qoute the license page, at their site (www.libsdl.org)
quote:

The most common way to comply with the license is to dynamically link with SDL, and then include the SDL source code and appropriate notices with your application


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Dreamcast and the XBox support D3D. So I guess it''s tied at two until the final verdict on the XBox is in . My point is, this isn''t exactly a commanding lead for OpenGL.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xbox will support OpenGL. Nvidia made the graphics system in the X-Box and nvidia has been a leader in OpenGL performance and features over the past few years. I doubt they would shoot themselves in the foot now by NOT supporting OpenGL.

And yes.. using SDL doen NOT meant you have to release you game OpenSource, if you expand SDL source directly you have to release your modifications, but not if you are just using the API.

OpenGL is supported on almost every high end graphics device I know of ( including all consoles ). It''s a nice well rounded API that has the full possibility for hardware accelleration ( including t&l ) without any modifications.

OpenGL is one of the best example of a portable library there are, it can scale from CPU driven to almost completly hardware accelerated without a single code change. D3d as I understand it is only NOW w7 & 8 getting to the point where it can hope to compete with OpenGL in terms of ease of use and expandability.

To say that Dx & D3d are the only API for mainstream gaming would be sticking your head in the ground and not using some of the most popular games as examples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now