• Advertisement

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OpenGL How many use OpenGL?

This topic is 6048 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Advertisement
I think you missed a "not"
Generally, 3D games is not programmed by Direct3D...

Most 3D games sold are not for Windows. Another thing to remember is that over 90% of the commercial game projects that is using Direct3D is losing money.

To be honest do I think that a discussion like this is pointless. What you can do should be more important.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think OpenGL is much better than Direct3D and we all should support it! M$ has enough money and we must stop them to control everything of the pc market!

The only thing which is better in D3D is D3DX and it''s helper functions for vertices,matrices and so on.... we should create such a thing for OpenGL..or is there something similar?? Don''t know...

...OpenGL 1.3...I think we all know why M$ stops releasing new OpenGL versions for Win.

Bye,
NoMoRe@

www.notatric.de

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree M$ is not the kind of firm I want to support, and I use OpenGL to release a game on many platforms at once.
(Linux, BeOS, Windows [money guys], maybe MacOS and freeBSD)

About D3DX I think it''s called glu in OpenGL :p

There''s also GLUT at a higher level.

-* So many things to do, so little time to spend. *-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I''m porting my engine to SDL+OpenGL right now (from the Win32 API and XLib). After I''m done it''ll be readilly compilable on Linux, Win32, BeOS, MacOS, Solaris, IRIX, and FreeBSD. All without changing a thing. The joys of OpenGL . The only annoying thing is dealing with the different directory structures in each OS, but that''s not too bad (I found a way around that).

[Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thing with SDL is by the license agreement you''re required to release your source code if you use it. If you''re making something open source that''s fine but if you want to release something commercial and don''t want to release your code, then I wouldn''t use SDL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Obelix
Most 3D games sold are not for Windows



?

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Edited by - Martee on June 26, 2001 7:05:03 PM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t use OpenGL, not at all. Nope, not me.

Anyhoo, I sure hope this won''t turn into a Direct3D vs. OpenGL flame war, cuz I''d have to take out my big shiny sword on this thread (wink wink nudge nudge), so keep it civilized.

------------------------------
Trent (ShiningKnight)
E-mail me
OpenGL Game Programming Tutorials

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>>quote:
Original post by Obelix
Most 3D games sold are not for Windows
?
<<
consoles

i believe the latest sales figures show less than 15% of games sold in 2000 were for pc''s.

http://members.xoom.com/myBollux

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... which is fine, except that this thread is about OGL vs. D3D ... and most consoles DON''T use OpenGL. So I fail to see what Obelix''s point is.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let''s see : Sony PS2, Nintendo GameCube and (rumors)the Xbox have an OpenGL implementation...

Guess what, I think you can use OpenGL on consoles.
Also you can use it on windows if you wish and you can use it for your favorite OS probably.

Cross dev for console, PCs in a single API that''s good
(of course you''ll have to change things a bit, but not that much)


And to answer the first question :
Noone is using OpenGL, see there''s no questions about OpenGL in this board, and John Carmack isn''t coding DOOMIII using almost every GeForce3 capabilities.

-* So many things to do, so little time to spend. *-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Supernova
The thing with SDL is by the license agreement you''re required to release your source code if you use it. If you''re making something open source that''s fine but if you want to release something commercial and don''t want to release your code, then I wouldn''t use SDL.


Sorry, but that is a misconception. SDL is under the LGPL and not under the GPL. This means, you only have to release your sourcecode if you mix your sourcecode with theirs. Use their sourcecode for your own purposes, and link with SDL dynamically and you should be fine.

To qoute the license page, at their site (www.libsdl.org)
quote:

The most common way to comply with the license is to dynamically link with SDL, and then include the SDL source code and appropriate notices with your application


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Dreamcast and the XBox support D3D. So I guess it''s tied at two until the final verdict on the XBox is in . My point is, this isn''t exactly a commanding lead for OpenGL.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xbox will support OpenGL. Nvidia made the graphics system in the X-Box and nvidia has been a leader in OpenGL performance and features over the past few years. I doubt they would shoot themselves in the foot now by NOT supporting OpenGL.

And yes.. using SDL doen NOT meant you have to release you game OpenSource, if you expand SDL source directly you have to release your modifications, but not if you are just using the API.

OpenGL is supported on almost every high end graphics device I know of ( including all consoles ). It''s a nice well rounded API that has the full possibility for hardware accelleration ( including t&l ) without any modifications.

OpenGL is one of the best example of a portable library there are, it can scale from CPU driven to almost completly hardware accelerated without a single code change. D3d as I understand it is only NOW w7 & 8 getting to the point where it can hope to compete with OpenGL in terms of ease of use and expandability.

To say that Dx & D3d are the only API for mainstream gaming would be sticking your head in the ground and not using some of the most popular games as examples.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
  • Advertisement