Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Metal Typhoon

EVERYBODY PLEASE SEE THIS !!!!!

Recommended Posts

So... Everybody says that vc++ is better than borland's builder right ? But look at this, and maybe u'll chage your mind. I did change mine !!!. Every good company show it's product against a competitor. Hummmmm.... ! Borland show that very well and in the other hand Microsoft DOESN'T , why ? Hehehe u know y !! LOOK AT THIS PLEASE "The shortcut is not always the best way " Metal Typhoon Edited by - Metal Typhoon on June 27, 2001 8:38:32 PM Edited by - Metal Typhoon on June 27, 2001 8:39:49 PM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Real Visual Development"
Ooh! I''m convinced!

"Database Enabled ISAPI, NSAPI, and CGI Development"
"ADO Express for fast connections to any Data"
"Integrated CORBA Development"
And we all know how important these are when it comes to game development

Seriously, though, I have nothing against Borland. I simply prefer VC++. And I don''t need the kind of stuff listed above.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm Im hungry

Writing a game w/ Borland C++ Builder is like cooking a turkey in a microwave.

Writing a game tool w/ MS VC++ is like reheating a pizza in an over.

or something...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Metal Typhoon
So... Everybody says that vc++ is better than borland''s builder right ? But look at this, and maybe u''ll chage your mind. I did change mine !!!. Every good company show it''s product against a competitor. Hummmmm.... ! Borland show that very well and in the other hand Microsoft DOESN''T , why ? Hehehe u know y !!

LOOK AT THIS PLEASE

"The shortcut is not always the best way "

Metal Typhoon

Edited by - Metal Typhoon on June 27, 2001 8:38:32 PM

Edited by - Metal Typhoon on June 27, 2001 8:39:49 PM


Actually, Borland has always been a better compiler than VC++, people only use vc++ because DX can be integrated to it''s projects with more ease. That''s the only reason why people use VC++. VC++ is actually a good compiler, don''t get me wrong. I''ve used borland compilers for quite a while back when dos was the operating system most people had and I also used symantec''s compiler in order to use DOS4G. Now, I found that the best compiler IMHO is CodeWarrior. The interface is easy to use and understand ans I just like the way it works also. It''s better suited to answer my needs... Anyhow, those are my opinions and aren''t meant to be offending for anybody... Sorry if it did..



"And that''s the bottom line cause I said so!"

Cyberdrek
Headhunter Soft
A division of DLC Multimedia

Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uh, no ...
What about all the VC++ features that Borland chose not to list?

Oh, and another reason I use VC++ is that I got it for free.

Edit: this is in reply to Metal Typhoon.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Edited by - Martee on June 27, 2001 9:09:48 PM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Metal Typhoon
So... Everybody says that vc++ is better than borland''s builder right ? But look at this, and maybe u''ll chage your mind. I did change mine !!!. Every good company show it''s product against a competitor. Hummmmm.... ! Borland show that very well and in the other hand Microsoft DOESN''T , why ? Hehehe u know y !!



Your a complete moron for even posting this on the forum and I will hope that someday you''ll actually realize how stupid you''ve acted. I use VC++6.0 and I never tried Boredland and you know what, I dont care! Visual C++ may not be as *perfect* as you think Boredland is but I like Visual C++ because it gets the job I need done. Why are you constantly posting crap on these forums you stupid disgrace for a newbie. If you had a half a brain or a life then you wouldn''t be posting crap like this but you''d be sitting at your computer eating Ramen Noodles and programming something with your *perfect* Boredland compiler. Loser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by Martee
Uh, no ...
What about all the VC++ features that Borland chose not to list?

Oh, and another reason I use VC++ is that I got it for free.

Edit: this is in reply to Metal Typhoon.

~~~~~~~~~~
Martee

Edited by - Martee on June 27, 2001 9:09:48 PM


Hahahahaha. And y Microsoft didn''t do the same and show agains''t another product , SINCE it''s better ? That should be obvious right ? Hummm...

"The shortcut is not always the best way "

Metal Typhoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
quote:
Original post by MiniZap
[quote]Original post by Metal Typhoon
So... Everybody says that vc++ is better than borland''s builder right ? But look at this, and maybe u''ll chage your mind. I did change mine !!!. Every good company show it''s product against a competitor. Hummmmm.... ! Borland show that very well and in the other hand Microsoft DOESN''T , why ? Hehehe u know y !!



Your a complete moron for even posting this on the forum and I will hope that someday you''ll actually realize how stupid you''ve acted. I use VC++6.0 and I never tried Boredland and you know what, I dont care! Visual C++ may not be as *perfect* as you think Boredland is but I like Visual C++ because it gets the job I need done. Why are you constantly posting crap on these forums you stupid disgrace for a newbie. If you had a half a brain or a life then you wouldn''t be posting crap like this but you''d be sitting at your computer eating Ramen Noodles and programming something with your *perfect* Boredland compiler. Loser.


Sorry if i did offend u. But you''re welcome to quit k ?

"The shortcut is not always the best way "

Metal Typhoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by merlin9x9
VC++, C++ Builder, CodeWarrior, blah. Use whatever you happen to like, because they all basically do the same thing.


WOW dude, what an answer , yeah !!


"The shortcut is not always the best way "

Metal Typhoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Borland show the positive points of their ide & compiler to make it look good, they arent going to show the negatives and all the things that VC6 does better than it.

It''s called advertising, and after a while you learn not to believe it.

Anyway I use VC6 because it''s what I have. Im not going out and buying another compiler just because it is advertised to supposedly be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NO,NO,NO. U didn''t get it. IF MICROSOFT''S COMPILER WAS THAT GOOD ,ENOUGH TO BET BORLAND''S, THE WOULD AT LEAST ADVERTISE, RIGHT ? BUT Y THEY DON''T DO IT ? Y

"The shortcut is not always the best way "

Metal Typhoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
quote:
Original post by Metal Typhoon
NO,NO,NO. U didn''t get it. IF MICROSOFT''S COMPILER WAS THAT GOOD ,ENOUGH TO BET BORLAND''S, THE WOULD AT LEAST ADVERTISE, RIGHT ? BUT Y THEY DON''T DO IT ? Y



I need help I think my computer has a virus, wait wait, no. Sorry, it''s no virus its just a message board with Metal Typhoon''s annoying messages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So just because they dont lie to the world about their compiler it makes it worse than the competition?

Advertising is done to get stuff sold, to make it look better than the competition, rarely is there truth in it. If Borlands compiler is so much better, why do the majority seem to be using VC around here? If Borland is so much better, why do companies that develope for Windows seem to be using VC more than Borland?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
quote:
Original post by Maximus
So just because they dont lie to the world about their compiler it makes it worse than the competition?

Advertising is done to get stuff sold, to make it look better than the competition, rarely is there truth in it. If Borlands compiler is so much better, why do the majority seem to be using VC around here? If Borland is so much better, why do companies that develope for Windows seem to be using VC more than Borland?


All the Bordland users like Metal Typhoon have migrated to the message boards because they can''t program. Why else would he be here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hummm.. Hahaha, funny guy. K i don''t know how to program right ? so i gotta use borland and u use vc++. since u KNOW ALOT then uses assembly. Hahahaha, after all u know how to program.. Hahaha. And i think u also meant to say that for all people who use VB and Delphi !!!!

"The shortcut is not always the best way "

Metal Typhoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anonymous Poster
quote:
Original post by Metal Typhoon
Hummm.. Hahaha, funny guy. K i don''t know how to program right ? so i gotta use borland and u use vc++. since u KNOW ALOT then uses assembly. Hahahaha, after all u know how to program.. Hahaha. And i think u also meant to say that for all people who use VB and Delphi !!!!



I''m funny, wow, thanks for the comment. Chances are you don''t know how yep. You dont have to use anything you can use whatever you want.Yes I know simple programming but I''m no guru and I am not writing a book, I never said I was. You think I mean to say for all the people who use VB and Delphi, ummm, no. I can say what I want to say for myself and I don''t want you talking for me. Your post proves that you are beyond a dought a moron and should remove yourself from the gene pool immediately. Case closed. Someone should close this post probably. As for me, I''ll be leaving now, bye!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.