# OpenGL 8 bit grayscale raw image problem

This topic is 3216 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

Hello, I am working on a terrain generator using heightmaps for a class I am currently in and I seem to have come across a problem which I cannot figure out, as I have very little experience using openGL. I have calculated a shadowmap based on my heightmap and saved it to my terrain file as simply a raw 8 bit image. However, when I attempt to load it into my graphics card I believe it thinks I am loading in a 24 bit image. I'm not sure so I will not speculate further, I'll just show you what is going on. When the shadow map is applied it looks like this: However, if I output the shadowmap as a .BMP it looks like it should, This is my shader source: Vertex Shader:
void main()
{
gl_Position = gl_ProjectionMatrix*gl_ModelViewMatrix*gl_Vertex;
gl_TexCoord[0] = gl_MultiTexCoord0;
}


uniform sampler2D sand;
uniform sampler2D grass;
uniform sampler2D rock;
uniform sampler2D snow;

uniform sampler2D alphamap;

void main(void)
{
vec4 alpha   = texture2D( alphamap,  gl_TexCoord[0].xy ).rgba;

vec4 tex0    = texture2D( sand,  gl_TexCoord[0].xy * 8.0 );
vec4 tex1    = texture2D( grass, gl_TexCoord[0].xy * 8.0 );
vec4 tex2    = texture2D( rock,  gl_TexCoord[0].xy * 8.0 );
vec4 tex3    = texture2D( snow,  gl_TexCoord[0].xy * 8.0 );

tex0 *= alpha.r;	// Red channel - sand/below sealevel
tex1 = mix( tex0, tex1, alpha.g );	// Green channel - grass/above sealevel
tex2 = mix( tex1, tex2, alpha.b );	// Blue channel - rock/steep slopes
vec4 outColor = mix( tex2, tex3, alpha.a );	// Alpha channel - snow/high altitude

gl_FragColor = clamp( outColor, 0.0, 1.0 );
}


and this is how I load in the image:
		GLuint texture_id;

glGenTextures(1, &texture_id);
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture_id);

/* set texture parameters */
if(GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic)
{
float MaxAnisotropic;
glGetFloatv(GL_MAX_TEXTURE_MAX_ANISOTROPY_EXT, &MaxAnisotropic);
glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAX_ANISOTROPY_EXT, MaxAnisotropic);
}

// set parameters
glTexParameterf( GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_NEAREST );
glTexParameterf( GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR );
glTexParameterf( GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_REPEAT );
glTexParameterf( GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_REPEAT );

// create mipmaps
gluBuild2DMipmaps( GL_TEXTURE_2D, internal_format, width, height, format, type, data );


This is how I call it: GraphicsManager::GetSingleton().LoadRawTexture("shadowmap", 1, map->get_width(), map->get_height(), GL_LUMINANCE, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, map->get_shadowmap()); I use a hashmap in my graphics manager and hash the names of textures, that is why I have "shadowmap" as the 1st argument. That may be a bad way of doing it, I don't know, but I know that it works for what I am currently doing. So that isn't the issue here. All I do when I render is
		// set uniform for shadowmap
glActiveTextureARB(GL_TEXTURE4);
glUniform1iARB(sampler_loc, 4);


If it comes down to it I will store the image as RGB, just repeating the 8bit value, but as heightmaps can get large, that seems far from a good solution. [Edited by - melbow on May 1, 2009 10:14:46 AM]

##### Share on other sites
GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE is making your glTexImage2D call expect 8 bits per pixel.

While its possible to use "GL_INTENSITY4" to indicate that the texture in video memory should be stored as 4-bit intensity, i believe that you still need to pass the data into glTexImage2D at a minimum of 8 bits per pixel (there is no type smaller than GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE)

so, when you load the file off disk, expand the data to 8-bits.

Something like this should do it: (off the top of my head, i may be wrong)

char * fourbitimage = whatever;char * eightbitimage = malloc(numPixels);for (int i = 0; i < numPixels/2; i++){   eightbitimage[i*2]   = (fourbitimage & 0x0F) << 1;   eightbitimage[i*2+1] = (fourbitimage & 0xF0);}glTexImage2D(...whatever... GL_INTENSITTY4, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, eightbitimage);

##### Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by ExorcistGL_UNSIGNED_BYTE is making your glTexImage2D call expect 8 bits per pixel.

My goodness do I feel silly. I actually meant 8 bit. I've edited my post. Sorry, I've been awake for... let's just say way too long.

It is stored as Unsigned Bytes, and I write it to my file like this:

std::fstream out;
out.open(output_file, std::ios::out | std::ios::binary);
... //some code later
out.write((char *)t.lightmap, t.num_vertices()); //num vertices just does w*h

##### Share on other sites
The image you say is correct is 513x513, so you must check the padding and stride of the image. The default alignment, which is 4, is not divisible by the stride of the image, which appears to be 513 bytes. Either pad the image to 516 (the next multiple of 4 above 513) or set the unpack alignment to 1 (see glPixelStore).

##### Share on other sites
Ohhh! If I understand correctly then, that would explain why my RGBA raw loads just fine that is also 513x513.

Thank you very much.

• 10
• 12
• 10
• 10
• 11
• ### Similar Content

• Good Evening,
I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on.
In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
Regards,
LifeArtist
• By QQemka
Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
Let's go:
Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
• By RenanRR
Hi All,
I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
#version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);
So, some doubts:
- Why use it like that?
- Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
-in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
- I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?

What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
it's right?

Thank you

• Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
// algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
extractedData /= 255.0f;

• While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?