Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Transparent Texture Maps

This topic is 3180 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

If this is posted before, I apologize and if you could post a link, it would be greatly appreciated… OK…My OpenGL experience is say moderate and I am now diving into more advanced techniques. Now I am trying to render a model of the planet Saturn. I have the model created, I know it a sphere how hard could it be, and the rings, and again a disc I know easy. Actually, I have the whole solar system with skybox, lighting, shading, realistic orbits, sizes and distances so now its time to add a little realism. Transparent rings, atmospheres and glow effects. I have created a smaller scale sample program for testing just this purpose. I have the model rendered and shaded, textured with a surface and a ring texture. The textures are from planet pixel emporium to give credit to the texture creator. Also on the site is a transparency map for the ring. It is an 8-bit transparency map. I would like to apply the transparency map to the rings that are rendered. One to give a more realistic look and two to see the planet behind the rings at certain angles. I have heard of this technique called 8-bit alpha channel but am still not sure if that is the case. From what I gather, it is really noting more than setting up the alpha blend method, disabling the depth buffer and rendering polygons. I have the red book and super bible but nothing stands out. Anyone have a code snippet or lead to an area that may shed some light? Thanks…

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
The easiest thing for you to do would be to take the 24-bit colour map you are using as the ring texture into Photoshop (or other suitable imaging software) and then add the 8-bit alpha image as the Alpha Channel.

Either that, or bind the alpha channel texture and in a shader simply calculate the colour based on that alpha texture.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I was afraid of that...

I was looking into texture combiners. Is this something I can do say load ring texture into TEXTURE0 and alpha into TEXTURE1 and somehow with these glTexEnv* commands combine the RGB of TEXTURE0 and A of TEXTURE1 then apply that to the filter chain?

BTW...A point to a good tut or texture alpha blending would be appreciated. I am making progress but it is slow going.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Well progress...I made a png with alpha channel and have been able to get parts of the transparency to work. Next question is, it seems the alpha map is not taking into consideration all the levels. It seems to only be filtering out only the highest levels. Since I am new at this not sure what blending and alpha functions to use. Any suggestions?

Code section showing blend and alpha code/comments...


for(uint j = 0; j < segment->face_count; j++) {
surface_t* surface = &surfaces[face->surface];
if(surface != current_surface) {
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_AMBIENT, surface->ambient);
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_EMISSION, surface->emissive);
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_DIFFUSE, surface->diffuse);
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_SPECULAR, surface->specular);
glMaterialf(GL_FRONT, GL_SHININESS, surface->reflectivity);



if(i == 1) { // No alpha map (Temporary until I find a better way to trigger blending in the model)
//if(surface->alpha_texture[0] != 0) { // No alpha map
//glAlphaFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, 0.2);
current_surface = surface;

face_vertex_t* fvert = (face_vertex_t*)&face->fvert_data;
for(uint k = 0; k < face->count; k++) {
glNormal3fv((float*)&fvert[k].normal); glTexCoord2fv((float*)&fvert[k].texel); glVertex3fv((float*)&vertexes[fvert[k].index]);
face = (face_t*)((uint)face + face->length);


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Where's the code where you load your textures? You should have this code in it:

glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, texture[0].width, texture[0].height, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, *pointer);

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Unless you've got a very odd effect in mind, you probably want glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) instead of your current blend func.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by, NeHe is located at where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at:
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/ projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
  • Popular Now