Sign in to follow this  
bmcclint

OpenGL Transparent Texture Maps

Recommended Posts

If this is posted before, I apologize and if you could post a link, it would be greatly appreciated… OK…My OpenGL experience is say moderate and I am now diving into more advanced techniques. Now I am trying to render a model of the planet Saturn. I have the model created, I know it a sphere how hard could it be, and the rings, and again a disc I know easy. Actually, I have the whole solar system with skybox, lighting, shading, realistic orbits, sizes and distances so now its time to add a little realism. Transparent rings, atmospheres and glow effects. I have created a smaller scale sample program for testing just this purpose. I have the model rendered and shaded, textured with a surface and a ring texture. The textures are from planet pixel emporium to give credit to the texture creator. Also on the site is a transparency map for the ring. It is an 8-bit transparency map. I would like to apply the transparency map to the rings that are rendered. One to give a more realistic look and two to see the planet behind the rings at certain angles. I have heard of this technique called 8-bit alpha channel but am still not sure if that is the case. From what I gather, it is really noting more than setting up the alpha blend method, disabling the depth buffer and rendering polygons. I have the red book and super bible but nothing stands out. Anyone have a code snippet or lead to an area that may shed some light? Thanks…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The easiest thing for you to do would be to take the 24-bit colour map you are using as the ring texture into Photoshop (or other suitable imaging software) and then add the 8-bit alpha image as the Alpha Channel.

Either that, or bind the alpha channel texture and in a shader simply calculate the colour based on that alpha texture.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was afraid of that...

I was looking into texture combiners. Is this something I can do say load ring texture into TEXTURE0 and alpha into TEXTURE1 and somehow with these glTexEnv* commands combine the RGB of TEXTURE0 and A of TEXTURE1 then apply that to the filter chain?

BTW...A point to a good tut or texture alpha blending would be appreciated. I am making progress but it is slow going.

Thanks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well progress...I made a png with alpha channel and have been able to get parts of the transparency to work. Next question is, it seems the alpha map is not taking into consideration all the levels. It seems to only be filtering out only the highest levels. Since I am new at this not sure what blending and alpha functions to use. Any suggestions?

Code section showing blend and alpha code/comments...

.
.
.

for(uint j = 0; j < segment->face_count; j++) {
surface_t* surface = &surfaces[face->surface];
if(surface != current_surface) {
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_AMBIENT, surface->ambient);
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_EMISSION, surface->emissive);
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_DIFFUSE, surface->diffuse);
glMaterialfv(GL_FRONT, GL_SPECULAR, surface->specular);
glMaterialf(GL_FRONT, GL_SHININESS, surface->reflectivity);

//glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0);
set_gl_texture(surface->main_texture);

//glDisable(GL_ALPHA);
glDisable(GL_BLEND);

if(i == 1) { // No alpha map (Temporary until I find a better way to trigger blending in the model)
//if(surface->alpha_texture[0] != 0) { // No alpha map
//glEnable(GL_ALPHA_TEST);
//glEnable(GL_ALPHA);
glEnable(GL_BLEND);
//glAlphaFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, 0.2);
glBlendFunc(GL_DST_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
}
current_surface = surface;
}

face_vertex_t* fvert = (face_vertex_t*)&face->fvert_data;
glBegin(GL_TRIANGLES);
for(uint k = 0; k < face->count; k++) {
glNormal3fv((float*)&fvert[k].normal); glTexCoord2fv((float*)&fvert[k].texel); glVertex3fv((float*)&vertexes[fvert[k].index]);
}
glEnd();
face = (face_t*)((uint)face + face->length);
}



.
.
.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where's the code where you load your textures? You should have this code in it:

glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, texture[0].width, texture[0].height, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, *pointer);

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Unless you've got a very odd effect in mind, you probably want glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) instead of your current blend func.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627764
    • Total Posts
      2978976
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now