Sign in to follow this  
Boltimus

OpenGL Multitexturing in openGL without shaders

Recommended Posts

I'm using multitexturing in openGL without shaders. Basically I'm using calls to glActiveTexture. I got the two textures to blend via interpolation. The problem is the that the second texture doesn't rotate with the first one. For example if I were to have two textures, one of the earth and the other of the moon and I placed them on a sphere, the earth texture would rotate when I rotate the sphere (by rotate I mean glRotate), but the moon texture stays stationary. I can't put my finger on it, perhaps I'm setting up the second texture unit wrong? Do I need to rotate the second texture using glRotate on the Texture Matrix? Thanks, Bolt [Edited by - Boltimus on June 5, 2009 1:42:34 PM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Check the texcoords for both textures.
What exatly are you rotating ??
the sphere ? the view ? the texture coordinates of either texture ?

The approach to maintain is to attach (multiple) texcoords to every vertex.
Translating/rotating the vertices should not affect the texture coordinates.
(as the texture maintains its composition on the model)
so no, you should not be rotating texture coordinates (basically)

post some code on how you set up multitexture and your render calls

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm having a hard time visualizing it. Can you post code and/or screenshots?

Textures generally should not "rotate". You supply texture coordinates when sending the vertex data (for instance in immediate mode call glMultiTexCoord for each texture unit that you activated, per vertex), the vertex will be modified by ModelView but that has no bearing on the texture coordinates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for your responses, your questions help me fill in the blanks here ...

Quote:

What exatly are you rotating ??
the sphere ? the view ? the texture coordinates of either texture ?


I'm rotating the view around the sphere. So as you move the ouse left or right the "globe" rotates about its own axis. Like spinning a globe.

Here is some sketch code ...


gl.glActiveTexture(GL.GL_TEXTURE0);
gl.glEnable(GL.GL_TEXTURE_2D);
gl.glTexGeni(GL.GL_S, GL.GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL.GL_SPHERE_MAP);
gl.glTexGeni(GL.GL_T, GL.GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL.GL_SPHERE_MAP);
gl.glBindTexture(GL.GL_TEXTURE_2D, (int) result.texture.getID());

gl.glActiveTexture(GL.GL_TEXTURE1);
gl.glEnable(GL.GL_TEXTURE_2D);

gl.glTexGeni(GL.GL_S, GL.GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL.GL_SPHERE_MAP);
gl.glTexGeni(GL.GL_T, GL.GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL.GL_SPHERE_MAP);

gl.glEnable(GL.GL_TEXTURE_GEN_S);
gl.glEnable(GL.GL_TEXTURE_GEN_T);

gl.glBindTexture(GL.GL_TEXTURE_2D,(Integer) result.texture.getID());
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV_MODE, GL.GL_COMBINE);
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_COMBINE_RGB, GL.GL_INTERPOLATE);
gl.glTexEnvfv(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV_COLOR,
new float[]{0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 0.5f}, 0);

gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_SOURCE0_RGB, GL.GL_PREVIOUS);
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_SOURCE1_RGB, GL.GL_TEXTURE);
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_OPERAND0_RGB, GL.GL_SRC_COLOR);
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_OPERAND1_RGB, GL.GL_SRC_COLOR);
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_SOURCE2_RGB, GL.GL_CONSTANT);
gl.glTexEnvi(GL.GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL.GL_OPERAND2_RGB, GL.GL_SRC_ALPHA);



Just an FYI, I'm using JOGL, which is the reason why you're seeing the gl.xxxx and GL.xxxx other than that, its the same as openGL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, I admit I haven't played with spherical texture mapping or multitexturing before, but I think I figured this out.

Generated spherical coordinates are apparently fixed in eye space, so they won't move when you rotate the camera. The reason they still move on texture unit 0 is because you did not call gl.glEnable(); with the texture generation commands for it, so instead of generating texture coordinates on the fly it's using coordinates that you supplied yourself as part of the draw call (you did send some, didn't you?). They are probably on a per-texture-unit basis.

Bottom line is, if you want to use GL_SPHERE_MAP to generate texture coordinates for spheres, you need to enable texture coordinate generation for each separate texture unit as well as transform the texture matrix from eye space back into world space. If I'm horribly wrong, surely someone will be along to correct me. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thx for the replies. V-man, I used GLU to create the texture coordinates originally for texture0, but to no avail. How would I use this with multitexturing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gluSphere just generate 1 pair of texcoords. If you want another, you write your own sphere code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That was the problem. It stinks that you generate multitexture coordinates for texture units greater than 1 like you can for texture unit 0. Anyhow, I took your advice V, and made my own "glusphere" where I added the multitexture coordinates, and normals and it works...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627714
    • Total Posts
      2978773
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now