• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Unity Best Game Engine for Indie Game?

This topic is 2428 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Advertisement
Just a point about the NeoAxis engine, the free version is non-commercial. There is an indie license (Less than $100000 income from the product) as well as a commercial license (More than $100000 income from the product), which cost $95 and $395 respectively (http://www.neoaxisgroup.com/services/licensing).

Other than that, I have used one of the engines listed, Torque 3D or rather the earlier version, Torque Game Engine Advanced, however this was only brief so i can't really give you much of an opinion of it, but i suggest taking a close look at what you need, who you think your target audience is and so on, this should help you to make a choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@Undeadragonslayer

Thanks for the input. I didn't see anything about a commercial license on the website for NeoAxis, so I'll have to go double check that. To address your questions...

Quote:
i suggest taking a close look at what you need, who you think your target audience is and so on, this should help you to make a choice.

My target audience is primarily PC users, probably more hardcore (thus better hardware) gamers who enjoy FPS games. Although I suspect that 90% of people who would want to play would be Windows gamers with decent hardware, I would hate to have to unnecessarily alienate potential players.

As for what I need, basically I just need a complete game engine including tools to setup levels. I don't necessarily need the best engine ever with an event system, AI, etc.. as I can program all of that myself. It would be nice to have an engine that doesn't require high specs and is cross-platform, but I have no idea how many potential customers I would be alienating if I went with a high-spec, PC only engine like Leadwerks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How many programmers do you have? With Torque 3D you only need licenses for the programmers that need the source to the engine. You're allowed to give a working build of your game to your artists so they can see their work (I'm not sure about leaving the script based editors in you'd have to ask about that), but either way, if they don't allow that there is a non-source license for $250 that you give to other members of your team, though I think they might be getting a little more lenient on this.

I haven't subscribed to it because I'm only a hobbyists and I now prefer C# over C++, so I'm working more with TX3D instead (which is not in the same league as T3D).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@blitzwing

So far I am the only programmer, I wanted to look at all the engines and decide on a technology before getting any more programmers. The only real need for the $1k license was to get the "advanced lighting", which is just parallax maps and shadow maps it seems like. However, I'm going to need level designers to actually setup the levels, and I'm fairly certain they would also need the $1k license to view their levels in the scene editor with advanced lighting enabled.

@zebeste

I tried looking at the C4 engine earlier today. It looked like a pretty attractive offer on the website, but when I went to test the demo things didn't go so great. A couple times I tried to load a level and it just sat there for a while, eventually leading me to have to turn the computer off manually. Also, the physics seem very hoaky.. getting stuck on tiny cracks in the ground, really weird feeling collision detection. I only tested C4 on my laptop so I'll have to try again on my desktop later.. but it just left sort of a bad taste in my mouth. (Sorry if you're one of the developers on it, it's still an impressive engine.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope, I'm not a developer of the engine (that title is reserved for Eric Lengyel). I don't know why it froze you laptop, but the physics in the engine is getting a complete overhaul in the next release. Also, one of the members maintains a PhysX integration which supposedly works quite well. Currently, the character uses a collision capsule for physics, which probably explains why it feels a little wierd, but as of the next release users will be able to use the world editor to use combinations of geometric shapes on models to represent more complex collision volumes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@jyk

I had actually never heard of Unity before. I downloaded it and took a look, that's definitely a very nice, professional engine. I'll have to take a serious look into that one.

@zebeste

I don't want to take anything away from any developer that's worked on the C4 engine, I know it's a ton of work to do something like that, but I just don't feel like C4 is solid enough to use for a real game yet.


After doing a ton of testing, the NeoAxis engine is looking like the best option at this point. The downloadable demo is extremely impressive, and the ability to produce something worth playing with a free version definitely says something. At the moment, it is restricted to Windows only platforms, but in the future there are plans to expand to Mac, consoles, and web deployment which is a very promising feature.

On the other hand though, Torque 3D is still a proven, professional quality product and it's nice to know that there is a huge user community of support out there. My plan from here is to test out the actual programming of NeoAxis and see if it's suited for a real game. If not, I think I'll have to go with Torque 3D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Try the A7 Engine but is not c++ is lite-c it cost $100.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe look at Panda3d as well? It's got a track record. And it's free. And it's got a large community. And it's used in Python, but made in C++, so you can extend it in C++ and make your game in python. This may be a good or bad thing to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is also this one:

http://www.esenthel.com/?id=news

Really awesome c++ engine, 0$, 200$ or 1000$, depending if you wish to use custom shaders and or sell the game.

Some even says its better then gamebryo ect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why dont u try fps creator? Its the easiest engine for making fpses and fps creator x10 has directx10 graphics. Dont use leadwerks as its mostly a rendering engine. Id use unity as its been proven in a bunch of games and is really easy to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by NightMarez
http://www.esenthel.com/?id=news

Really awesome c++ engine, 0$, 200$ or 1000$, depending if you wish to use custom shaders and or sell the game.


I was just about to suggest you check it out, surprised to see that someone beat me to it. Esenthel is one of those little gems that has all of the pieces needed, you really just have to learn how to use those pieces. OOTB, it comes with a mesh editor and world editor, source updater (to keep it current), and tons of examples covering most stuff people are actually interested in for games.

This isn't to say it's the only engine you should consider, but it does have all of the things you said you were looking for, at a very attractive price if you're not going commercial or wanting more than the default shaders. Definitely worth it to check it out.

FlyingIsFun1217

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I put my vote in for Leadwerks, very nice features for it´s price. You can have a character controller with physics and fps camera up and running in minutes. When your game is finished most people will probably have SM 3 cards, check Steam´s hardware survey http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by bengaltgrs

@zebeste

I tried looking at the C4 engine earlier today. It looked like a pretty attractive offer on the website, but when I went to test the demo things didn't go so great. A couple times I tried to load a level and it just sat there for a while, eventually leading me to have to turn the computer off manually. Also, the physics seem very hoaky.. getting stuck on tiny cracks in the ground, really weird feeling collision detection. I only tested C4 on my laptop so I'll have to try again on my desktop later.. but it just left sort of a bad taste in my mouth. (Sorry if you're one of the developers on it, it's still an impressive engine.)


Hi bengaltgrs it seams you were misguided by the simplistic physics of the C4 demo, the engine can use any physics API and there are users with a PhysX and Bullet integration already done, also Eric is making a on house physics engine for C4 version 1.6 (the next version) and will do a revised demo to showcase the physics and the new terrain features. You say you add problems running the C4 engine demo, without your laptop specs i can only speculate, but it needs a fairly good GPU (NV 6600 or better ATI x1300 or better) to run also because of the new voxel terrain shader it will not run on Intel GPU's if your laptop as a Intel GPU them that's why it didn't worked well.

Quote:
I don't want to take anything away from any developer that's worked on the C4 engine, I know it's a ton of work to do something like that, but I just don't feel like C4 is solid enough to use for a real game yet.


About this, it is wrong, C4 engine is ready for real games and that's why there are already games for sell made with it.

Some examples:
http://www.world-of-subways.com/

http://www.questofpersia.com/main/index.html

Games in the making:

http://www.greysoul.net/

http://celestialspheregame.com/

http://www.perfectblackgames.com/tvd/



http://www.bleedingcolourstudio.com/php/adf.php

And more....

I hope this helps clear all misconceptions about C4 engine.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm developing an outdoor FPS, and I'm settling on C4 as my engine choice. Unity and Neoaxis are strong contenders. I also considered 3D Gamestudio A7, and I've heard good things about Panda3D as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you ask any professional developer (indie or otherwise) I'm sure you'll find that there is no "Best Game Engine". There are always +'s and -'s when you talk about any game engine be it Unreal or Torque.

So for now what you want to look at is the "Best Game Engine" for your purposes. Which means evaluating things like:

1) Is the engine primaraly a FPS engine? If so then making another type of game such as a RPG or third person action game with it might not be feasable due to design decisions made.

2) Features. If you plan to use HDR and the engine doesn't support it...well you can see where this is going.

3) Support. The game engine you are using either needs to have support via it's developers or through a well established community (no startup engines here). Otherwise how are you going to get questions answered?

4) Tools, Your looking for an engine that has plugins for the modeling program you use, particle editors, ect. Buying an engine that only has max plugins is useless unless you actually have 3d studio max. Other tools for the engine itself help with your development/prototyping pipeline, if they suck then people are going to get frustrated and say "This engine sucks".

In short the best engine is what works for your needs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by HostileExpanse
I'm developing an outdoor FPS, and I'm settling on C4 as my engine choice. Unity and Neoaxis are strong contenders. I also considered 3D Gamestudio A7, and I've heard good things about Panda3D as well.


Wow, you must know quite a few programming languages pretty well.

FlyingIsFun1217

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by bengaltgrs
I tried looking at the C4 engine earlier today. It looked like a pretty attractive offer on the website, but when I went to test the demo things didn't go so great. A couple times I tried to load a level and it just sat there for a while, eventually leading me to have to turn the computer off manually.


An application by itself cannot freeze your computer to the point that you have to turn off the power. But a driver can. Either your graphics hardware is fried, and/or your graphics drivers are completely broken, and that's what should be putting a bad taste in your mouth. Levels in the C4 demo load in 1-2 seconds on properly working hardware with properly working drivers, and it would be an incorrect assumption to hastily conclude that any problems you had with the demo are the fault of the engine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I too got a little bit scared of the C4 demos, especially so because of the physics. Got stuck in some cave and had to restart. But C4 has support from it's awesome author which is more than you can say about Torque which I've been using since 2003 now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
what about 3DRAD ?

I have made a full game using 3DRAD. It's not hard at all, just requires some patience working around it's limitations.

check out my demo at :

http://tinystudents.com/3drad.html


YOUTUBE VIDEO :
=============

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is 2428 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By 3dmodelerguy
      So I am building a turn based rogue-like (think CDDA). The game is going to have a very large map (up to 1000's x 1000's) however to alleviate most of that I obviously can't render everything so there will just be render a certain radius around the player and just load in and out data as the player moves.
      The next major system I am prototyping is making interactive tiles destructible and pretty much everything will be destructible besides basic landscape (cars, doors, windows, structures, etc. will be destructible)
      While I am only rendering a certain amount of tiles around the player, I want to keep the amount of colliders active at one time to be as small as possible for performance and currently the tilemap tool I use automatically merges colliders together.
      So instead of creating a separate colliders for each of these tiles and having the destructible behavior tied to that object (which my tilemap tool would allow me to do) I was thinking that I would store an array of all the X and Y locations for the interactive tilemap layer and let the tilemap manage the colliders. 
      Then when I hit a collider on the interactive tilemap layer, instead of of getting the behavior for how to deal with the destruction for that tile from that game object, I would pull it from the array I mentioned earlier based on the tile I attempt to interact with which I already have.
      Does this sound like a good approach? Any other recommendations would be welcomed.
    • By NDraskovic
      Hey guys,
      I have a really weird problem. I'm trying to get some data from a REST service. I'm using the following code:
       
      private void GetTheScores() { UnityWebRequest GetCommand = UnityWebRequest.Get(url); UnityWebRequestAsyncOperation operation = GetCommand.SendWebRequest(); if (!operation.webRequest.isNetworkError) { ResultsContainer rez = JsonUtility.FromJson<ResultsContainer>(operation.webRequest.downloadHandler.text); Debug.Log("Text: " + operation.webRequest.downloadHandler.text); } } The problem is that when I'm in Unity's editor, the request doesn't return anything (operation.webRequest.downloadHandler.text is empty, the Debug.Log command just prints "Text: "), but when I enter the debug mode and insert a breakpoint on that line, then it returns the text properly. Does anyone have an idea why is this happening?
      The real problem I'm trying to solve is that when I receive the text, I can't get the data from the JSON. The markup is really simple:
      [{"id":1,"name":"Player1"},{"id":2,"name":"Player2"}] and I have an object that should accept that data:
      [System.Serializable] public class ResultScript { public int id; public string name; } There is also a class that should accept the array of these objects (which the JSON is returning):
      [System.Serializable] public class ResultsContainer { public ResultScript[] results; } But when I run the code (in the debug mode, to get any result) I get an error: ArgumentException: JSON must represent an object type. I've googled it but none of the proposed solutions work for me.
      Also (regardless if I'm in the debug mode or not) when I try to do some string operations like removing or adding characters to the GET result, the functions return an empty string as a result
      Can you help me with any of these problems?
      Thank you
    • By nihitori
      The Emotional Music Vol. I pack focuses on beautiful and esoteric orchestral music, capable of creating truly emotive and intimate moods. It features detailed chamber strings, cello and piano as the main instruments, resulting in a subtle and elegant sound never before heard in video game royalty-free music assets.

      The pack includes 5 original tracks, as well as a total of 47 loops based on these tracks (long loops for simple use and short loops for custom / complex music layering).

      Unity Asset Store link: https://www.assetstore.unity3d.com/en/#!/content/107032
      Unreal Engine Marketplace link: https://www.unrealengine.com/marketplace/emotional-music-vol-i

      A 15 seconds preview of each main track is available on Soundcloud:
       
    • By RoKabium Games
      Another one of our new UI for #screenshotsaturday. This is the inventory screen for showing what animal fossils you have collected so far. #gamedev #indiedev #sama
    • By eldwin11929
      We're looking for programmers for our project.
      Our project is being made in Unity
      Requirements:
      -Skills in Unity
      -C#
      -Javascript
      -Node.js
      We're looking for programmers who can perform a variety of functions on our project.
      Project is a top-down hack-and-slash pvp dungeon-crawler like game. Game is entirely multiplayer based, using randomized dungeons, and a unique combat system with emphasis on gameplay.
      We have a GDD to work off of, and a Lead Programmer you would work under.
      Assignments may include:
      -Creating new scripts of varying degrees specific to the project (mostly server-side, but sometimes client-side)
      -Assembling already created monsters/characters with existing or non-existing code.
      -Creating VFX
      -Assembling already created environment models
      If interested, please contact: eldwin11929@yahoo.com
      This project is unpaid, but with royalties.
       
      ---
      Additional Project Info:
      Summary:
      Bassetune Reapers is a Player-verus-Player, competitive dungeon crawler. This basically takes on aspects of dungeon crawling, but with a more aggressive setting. Players will have the option to play as the "dungeon-crawlers" (called the 'Knights', or "Knight Class", in-game) or as the "dungeon" itself (literally called the 'Bosses', or "Boss Class", in-game). What this means is that players can choose to play as the people invading the dungeon, or as the dungeon-holders themselves.
      Key Features:
      -Intense, fast-paced combat
      -Multiple skills, weapons, and ways to play the game
      -Tons of different Bosses, Minibosses, creatures and traps to utilize throughout the dungeon
      -Multiple unique environments
      -Interesting, detailed lore behind both the game and world
      -Intricate RPG system
      -Ladder and ranking system
      -Lots of customization for both classes s of customization for both classes
  • Advertisement