Sign in to follow this  
TTK-Bandit

OpenGL DualMonitors ?

Recommended Posts

Just wondering how you would add support for dualmonitor display with opengl. I don't have a second monitor, so I cant try it, just would like to find some resources to get started and then test it somewhere else. I have googled quite a bit, but couldn't find anything. could it be that you just size the window-width to the double size of the screen ? Or do you have to use multiple windows and move the second window to the center of both monitors ? Question goes for Win32, Linux, MacOsX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is a very platform specific topic, I am afraid, although some high-end windowing toolkits provide support for it. Look around for windowing solutions which also target Virtual Reality applications, and you should have some luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Create one OpenGL window/context/whatever for each monitor =P It's as simple as that, although it can lead to headaches if you have to adapt code that was originally made for a single monitor (normally it's just a matter of setting what context to render next, but you never know what stupid quirk the code may have...).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You might run into a problem too...

In all the dual monitor setups I've seen, only one monitor had hardware accelerated graphics.

IE if you had a windowed game running, you'd get a lot higher FPS on one monitor vs the other.

Just somethin to be aware of!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It also depends how the user has configured their dual monitors.

Most often it's set up as "dual view", where they are two independent displays. However, the user may have configured them to act as a single (Large) monitor with a weird resolution, in which case you just have to support this large-resolution and know where the split occurs.
I've worked on a system that used this mode in the past, and found that only one half of the large virtual-screen (i.e. one physical screen) would use quality-enhancements such as AA or Aniso-filtering...

To get around the "only one monitor is HW accelerated" problem mentioned above, you can render the slow screen's content to a texture using the accelerated context. The slow context then just has to blit this texture to the screen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All dual monitor setups I've seen so far (and including mine) had a) hardware acceleration for all screens and b) consisted of a single desktop area that was not rectangular (eg. 1600x1200 with the right border leading into a 1920x1080 screen). Does anyone really use it as mirrored or separate screens?

Supreme Commander supports this nicely, you have two fully functional game screens, usually I leave the left one zoomed out to act as an overhead map and use the right one to play. Or zoom the left one to my army and the right one to the place I want to arrange them at, so I don't need to scroll to select the different units.

It's a D3D game, though. In Direct3D, a dual-head graphics card with two monitors attached simply appears as two Direct3D devices with different supported resolutions. I guess it's similar in OpenGL, you'd just create two windows and two contexts.

The only problem is if you move a 3D rendering window between the two screens. The application needs to detect this and recreate another D3D device / OGL context for the other screen. And if the window is placed in the middle between two screens, you either have to do a slow memory copy (that's what XNA does) or keep two devices/contexts around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Cygon
All dual monitor setups I've seen so far (and including mine) had a) hardware acceleration for all screens and b) consisted of a single desktop area that was not rectangular (eg. 1600x1200 with the right border leading into a 1920x1080 screen). Does anyone really use it as mirrored or separate screens?
What you just described is two separate screens. The "single virtual screen" setting would show up as a single device, e.g. 3200x1200.
Also, in the case I mentioned, both screens were accelerated, but one still took shortcuts (ignoring quality hints/preferences).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628356
    • Total Posts
      2982252
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now