Sign in to follow this  
Simon_Roth

OpenGL Optimising my renderer.

Recommended Posts

Hi I'm trying to improve upon my renderer that I created for my major project last year (Opengl and C++). Its deferred so overdraw isn't much of an issue. I'm currently trying to integrate instancing on as many pieces of drawn geometry as possible. I've had it before on specific objects such as terrain or vegetation, but now I really want to reduce the amount of special cases in the pipeline. Currently heres the pipeline: Geometry nodes are culled against the viewports bounding box. They are added to a list records of things to draw. This list can be sorted by distance depending on the complexity and overdraw expected. (My assumption is that more time would be wasted on the sort than on overdraw in the differed pipeline) Heres where I'm stuck. I was thinking that every time a record of a node is added to the list I check to see whether a draw call has already been made and just store its matrix and flag the record as instanced. I'm not totally sure I want to take that path however as the search through the list might end up taking more time if the scene complexity becomes too high. If I am storing distances however it would give me an easy way to break up the rendering into foreground, background and middleground lists. Which could speed the searches up. I'm sure theres a better way but Its 8.30am and I'm out of ideas. :P -Si

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Instead of a list use a binary tree, that combines inserting and sorting, its then simply a case of rendering each node, left first then right, recursivly.
You could add some kind of RenderState for each node and watch for change in the insert function and then watch a hasChanged flag during rendering to see if you need to change the render state. Thats what I'm doing (sort of) with my renderer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you sure that you are CPU bound? If not, then your attention should be focused on the GPU side of things. If so, have you considered using multi-threading to help speed things up? You could do something like performing updating and scene traversal in one thread, then submit the draw operations to a command buffer which gets executed on another thread. This should minimize the CPU pinch point in your engine, and let you use whatever traversal techniques you want.

I think there was an article in ShaderX7 about doing this if you have a copy handy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Funnily enough I do have shader 7 but I'm between houses and haven't got access to any of my books. >< Its probably why I'm struggling to be inspired. I will try to handle the command generation on another thread (I'm using openMP at the moment for simplicity). The system isn't particularly CPU bound just because of the scenes(http://www.blackskiesgame.com/vids/BlackSkies_hi.wmv) I've been rendering. But I'm currently trying to implement an AI system with hundreds of agents and I want to fix the problem before it occurs.

The binary tree is a very good idea. Its silly that I hadn't thought of that. There are a few other reasons why I'm using lists though. However the benefits of the sorted insertion outweighs my losses in this case.

Thanks guys. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, I agree, totaly awesome...

@Jason Z:
What would that entail? would you have two command buffers and 'double-buffer' or maybe just a queue that the graphics thread looks at?

cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
is your render loop like


for all batches
lock vertexbuffer
lock indexbuffer
fill both
unlock both
render


some ppl who read quake map tutorial tend to do it in such suboptimal way, i just want to make sure you dont :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by JPulham
Yeah, I agree, totaly awesome...

@Jason Z:
What would that entail? would you have two command buffers and 'double-buffer' or maybe just a queue that the graphics thread looks at?

cheers
It depends on what types of command sequences you issue. You just want to make sure that your system works without locks - use the buffer to protect your rendering thread from any type of synchronization bottlenecks. If you double buffer it, then the command buffer would start with a 'begin' command and end with an 'end' command. The same thing could be done with a queue as well - the rendering thread would just watch until a begin/end sequence is in the queue, then grab the sequence between without interrupting the game thread.

I don't really use OpenGL, so I don't know what types of multithreading issues it may or may not have. The D3D11 runtime is specifically set up to allow such a scheme with minimal haggling with the API (that was a shameless plug for D3D11, but seriously - check it out!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627754
    • Total Posts
      2978947
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now