class Foo
{
public:
Foo(){}
virtual ~Foo(){}
virtual void doStuff() = 0;
virtual void doStuff2() = 0;
};
[.net] Wrap c++ class
Author
Hello,
I have a abstract c++ class inside a dll that I want to wrap in .NET this class has alot of virtual functions. I have been searching for hours on google how to wrap this but I couldn't find any good ways. The only way I have found is this one.
So my question is, is there a cleaner way to wrap a abstract class in c++/cli.
example:
Is this class exported from the DLL?
The thing with virtual function is you'd have to create a derived class that overrides the virtual functions in the DLL(to give them functionality; an intent; a purpose; whatever you wanna call it).
I don't know the specifics with managed C++ but this should be fairly straight-forward if the class is exported from the DLL. http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread14329.html has some more info. It could also help you if you ask this question in a managed C++ discussion forum.
The thing with virtual function is you'd have to create a derived class that overrides the virtual functions in the DLL(to give them functionality; an intent; a purpose; whatever you wanna call it).
I don't know the specifics with managed C++ but this should be fairly straight-forward if the class is exported from the DLL. http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread14329.html has some more info. It could also help you if you ask this question in a managed C++ discussion forum.
If there are only pure virtual functions the best thing to do might be to define a matching interface in .NET
When there is no implementation at all, why wrap? What's there to wrap?
When there is no implementation at all, why wrap? What's there to wrap?
Author
Quote:Original post by WahidB
Hello,
I have a abstract c++ class inside a dll that I want to wrap in .NET this class has alot of virtual functions. I have been searching for hours on google how to wrap this but I couldn't find any good ways. The only way I have found is this one.
So my question is, is there a cleaner way to wrap a abstract class in c++/cli.
Quote:Original post by ernow
If there are only pure virtual functions the best thing to do might be to define a matching interface in .NET
When there is no implementation at all, why wrap? What's there to wrap?
I already figured out how to do it but it will require some work.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
