Epic Fails of Portfolio Submission

Started by
22 comments, last by Gaiiden 14 years, 6 months ago
Quote:Original post by OrangyTang
Quote:Original post by Kaze
Quote:Original post by Straudos
5. Applicant shows every single student project from art school…and a few from high school.


Why this, is their some shame in acquiring art skills through practice and tutoring rather than being born with them.

Portfolios should showcase your very best work


But thats exactly my point, if you put any effort at all into your trade your skill will improve massively after dedicating a few years solely to improving it. Most people won't put their art from high school in because it will look like crap compared to their post secondary work.

EDIT:
So it doesn't make sense unless either:
A: You want people to put art in their portfolio that's of far lower quality than what their currently capable of.
B: You want to hire people with no motivation to improve their skills.
Advertisement
Quote:Original post by Straudos
1. Two words: Erotic Furries.
I'm by no means an expert on the furry subject, but doesn't a big part of manga (which I daresay is successful!) consist of that kind of stuff? From seeing one or the other out-of-context image on the internet over the years, I remember school girls with short skirts, cat women, fox mean, tiger men (and whatever), demons, and all weird things with tentacles, and a good amount of violence and rape at times, too. Obviously people do buy that, else it wouldn't be made.

So, while erotic furries aren't precisely my thing... I don't see how they automatically have to be an epic failure, as there seems to be a market for it. At the very least, if they are good ones, they should show that the applicant has, in principle, talent (regardless of whether one likes them or not).
Quote:Why this, is their some shame in acquiring art skills through practice and tutoring rather than being born with them.

I believe its more along the lines, if you done this it would be 100s pages of content i.e. overkill

BTW - never even heard of furries until now, well you learn something every day

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom

though surely the wiki is wrong
'however, fans consider the origins of furry fandom to be much earlier, with fictional works such as Kimba, The White Lion released in 1965, Richard Adams' novel Watership Down, published in 1972'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_rabbit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wind_in_the_Willows
Quote:Original post by instinKt
Quote:Original post by Oberon_Command
Quote:Original post by Yann L
Quote:Original post by Straudos
Erotic Furries.

That is an oxymoron.


In what sense?


Whoosh.

I believe he's stating that furries can not be erotic...


Well, that's what I thought, but I tend to think of "erotic furries" as a complete term referring to a particular kind of fetish art and not as a concatenation of two separate terms, not to mention that treating a subjective opinion (furry porn is not arousing to me) as an objective fact (furry porn is not arousing to anyone) in quite that way, even in jest, is something that seemed a bit "off", so I wasn't sure. That said, I don't think furries are erotic either. Maybe I'm just becoming too politically correct (or whatever the right term is) nowadays.
moving away from the erotic furbies... [looksaround]

More portfolio do's and don'ts from a cabal of hiring managers presented by Jim Rivers from Obsidian during AGDC (see last tweet in session for full slide deck with much, much more)

Drew Sikora
Executive Producer
GameDev.net

Quote:Original post by Kaze

But thats exactly my point, if you put any effort at all into your trade your skill will improve massively after dedicating a few years solely to improving it. Most people won't put their art from high school in because it will look like crap compared to their post secondary work.

EDIT:
So it doesn't make sense unless either:
A: You want people to put art in their portfolio that's of far lower quality than what their currently capable of.
B: You want to hire people with no motivation to improve their skills.


I'm not too sure I understand what you're saying. Their latest work is generally going to be their greatest, so generally latest work = greatest work = work you put in portfolio. You might want to put in earlier work if you simply haven't had time to expand in that area (eg you haven't done any 2d sprite art since your second year, so you throw in your second year work), but putting in stuff from High School implies your skill in that area (whatever the High School stuff represents) hasn't grown at all.

Alternatively, it could mean that you're terrible at any sort of self-assessment and auditing, which is still a black mark against you.
I'm wondering if the people who didn't get this might be some of the people that would also be offenders?

It's generally considered a taboo to disgust the person you're interviewing, or to waste their time. Sending them erotica most people would find uncomfortable, or even *asking* them to swamp through every piece of paper you ever touched a pen to, would certainly make me lean towards a more.. "with it" candidate.

It's all about selling yourself, really. Give the company only what they're looking for, and nothing that they're not.
Quote:Original post by EtnuBwahaha. I would've shot the guy in the balls.
Quote:Original post by Chokki
I'm wondering if the people who didn't get this might be some of the people that would also be offenders?

It's generally considered a taboo to disgust the person you're interviewing, or to waste their time. Sending them erotica most people would find uncomfortable, or even *asking* them to swamp through every piece of paper you ever touched a pen to, would certainly make me lean towards a more.. "with it" candidate.

It's all about selling yourself, really. Give the company only what they're looking for, and nothing that they're not.


Exactly.

If you send an employer ten gazillion portfolio items then, in my opinion, you're either a) unsure and insecure about your own work, so are stabbing in the dark or b) a narcissist, showing off everything you've ever done as if it's God's gift. Same goes for an essay length CV - you just come across as being self important, rude and probably quite dull.

Either way, you come across as a fucknut. Next, please.
Quote:Original post by Gaiiden
moving away from the erotic furbies... [looksaround]


Oh Yeah . . .
Quote:Original post by Winegums
Quote:Original post by Kaze

But thats exactly my point, if you put any effort at all into your trade your skill will improve massively after dedicating a few years solely to improving it. Most people won't put their art from high school in because it will look like crap compared to their post secondary work.

EDIT:
So it doesn't make sense unless either:
A: You want people to put art in their portfolio that's of far lower quality than what their currently capable of.
B: You want to hire people with no motivation to improve their skills.


I'm not too sure I understand what you're saying. Their latest work is generally going to be their greatest, so generally latest work = greatest work = work you put in portfolio. You might want to put in earlier work if you simply haven't had time to expand in that area (eg you haven't done any 2d sprite art since your second year, so you throw in your second year work), but putting in stuff from High School implies your skill in that area (whatever the High School stuff represents) hasn't grown at all.

Alternatively, it could mean that you're terrible at any sort of self-assessment and auditing, which is still a black mark against you.


I interpreted "…and a few from high school" as them wanting more older works but I guess it could mean they just want quality over quantity.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement