Sign in to follow this  
dc443

OpenGL FBO's and Multisampling

Recommended Posts

http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Multisampling This page goes over the standard method of creating a program that detects and enables FSAA under windows, but I can't seem to find any instructions for doing the same on Linux. Can anybody provide me with information on this topic? Also kind of related: what is the difference from FSAA (the type that you force from the driver control panel in windows) vs the ARB Multisample Extension (which i'm hoping one can use to selectively antialias parts of a scene by using glEnable(GL_MULTISAMPLE) or some such)? I've been googling this stuff for hours now and all i've got is a headache. Heres an interesting tidbit: I have a Ubuntu 9.04 VM in Virtualbox on Windows 7 host, and when I put this line
	SDL_GL_SetAttribute(SDL_GL_MULTISAMPLEBUFFERS, 1); 
before creating my SDL window, Virtualbox crashes when I run the program. [Edited by - dc443 on November 6, 2009 11:59:45 PM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, well first of all, the ARB_multisample extension is a mess. Try to avoid it if possible. A much better alternative is to use a non-FSAA screen format, together with a multisampled FBO. This is much more flexible, powerful and clean. It's also much easier to setup and use.

That said, I'm not sure if you can get any of this on Linux if it is running under a VM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I take it that you are suggesting I use GL_EXT_framebuffer_multisample and GL_EXT_framebuffer_blit in addition to the GL_EXT_framebuffer_object extension... as described in this page: http://blog.dexta.ch/2008/08/27/gl_ext_framebuffer_object-with-multisampling/

(btw how do you do hyperlinks on this forum?)

How does this method compare to "the other ways" of doing multisampling? Is this separate from the settings that you force in the display drivers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Yann L
OK, well first of all, the ARB_multisample extension is a mess. Try to avoid it if possible. A much better alternative is to use a non-FSAA screen format, together with a multisampled FBO. This is much more flexible, powerful and clean. It's also much easier to setup and use.

That said, I'm not sure if you can get any of this on Linux if it is running under a VM.


VirtualBox has Pretty decent OpenGL support (OpenGL 2.0 was fully supported in VB 3.0 including GLSL support (On Linux, Windows and Solaris guests atleast)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by dc443
So I take it that you are suggesting I use GL_EXT_framebuffer_multisample and GL_EXT_framebuffer_blit in addition to the GL_EXT_framebuffer_object extension...

Yep. Or use ARB_framebuffer_object, which includes all three extensions in one.

Quote:
Original post by dc443
How does this method compare to "the other ways" of doing multisampling? Is this separate from the settings that you force in the display drivers?

It's separate, since FBOs are independent render targets. You choose the multisampling level and config separately for each FBO (although you can share attachments). You can even have several FBOs with different MS settings in use simultaneously, within the same application.

The settings on the driver page will only change the AA config of your main framebuffer, ie. the one that is eventually displayed on the screen. This one is independent of any FBO you create.

In practice, your screen framebuffer would be non-multisampled. You do all your rendering into a MS FBO, resolve it (possibly using a customized resolve shader, if needed) and copy it onto the non-AA'ed screen framebuffer.

Quote:
Original post by dc443
(btw how do you do hyperlinks on this forum?)

Standard HTML link tags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the quick replies! :)

How does the performance of this multisampled FBO method compare with traditional methods?

As I understand it, I need to render to a multisampled FBO, then blit it into another FBO attached to a texture, and then render that texture as a full screen quad. This seems like doing so much extra work. Drawing a full screen texture quad always felt like a big hack to me.

How is support for this from ATI? I saw some Nvidia charts indicating that the FBO extensions are supported for the hardware that is capable of it with recent drivers, but I don't know about ATI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Yann L
OK, well first of all, the ARB_multisample extension is a mess. Try to avoid it if possible. A much better alternative is to use a non-FSAA screen format, together with a multisampled FBO. This is much more flexible, powerful and clean. It's also much easier to setup and use.

That said, I'm not sure if you can get any of this on Linux if it is running under a VM.


Hehehe. That's an interesting idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627734
    • Total Posts
      2978846
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now