Sign in to follow this  
irreversible

OpenGL wrapping shader code

Recommended Posts

I'm currently doing all of my stuff in OpenGL and thus far I have just a couple of shaders that I really need or want. The problem is I've adapted one of these in cg, which I haven't read too much positive about. I know there are profile converters out there that would probably convert it to GLSL for me and save me some headache (as one can probably tell, I'm not too well versed in shader stuff and usually try to avoid using them if I can help it - especially since I generally really don't need shaders for what I'm doing), but that's really not the issue for me right now. What I've done is created a video "driver" wrapper (a renderer, not a real driver), which hides API-specific code. Even though I'm using cg stuff directly right now, bypassing the wrapper, and everything seems to be working fine on my computer, I'm can't help but wonder if I should dump either cg or GLSL (eg, should I expect any issues to arise when mixing the two?) and if I should, then which one should I keep? Secondly, how similar is HLSL to GLSL and should I expect any quirks/special cases to crop up when (or if) I do decide to implement a D3D renderer? My GLSL code loads shaders directly from a buffer in memory with no additional setup required, which makes it very robust. I assume HLSL to not be much different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GLSL only works with GL, so if you want an API-independent solution, go with CG.

You may not know this, but CG and HLSL are actually 2 different implementations of the same language. The difference is that CG (NVidia's implementation) has a compiler that supports both DX and GL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the reply, hodgman!

As for GLSL and HLSL - I know they're API-dependent; what I was driving at was whether I should go with GLSL or cg for OpenGL (and a separate HLSL pipeline for D3D). I didn't know cg compiled for both :)

Like I mentioned, I've read a few bad things about cg, though - along the lines that its reliability/consistency/support on different platforms is really not that good. Additionally, since it's nVidias, would it be rational to assume that cg shaders won't work on API cards?

The most important question right now, though, is whether it's okay to mix cg and GLSL or should I be aware of something when doing so?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry I've never mixed two shader languages in the one app, so I've got no advice for that :/
Quote:
Original post by irreversible
I've read a few bad things about cg, though - along the lines that its reliability/consistency/support on different platforms is really not that good.
Well this doesn't help with GL, only DX, but if there are cases of incompatibility -- seeing that CG and HLSL are the same language, you should be able to pass CG code to DirectX directly (as if it were HLSL code) without using the CG runtimes at all.
For example, the 360 uses Microsoft-HLSL and the PS3 uses NVidia-CG, but we write one shader and it works on both platforms.
""NVIDIA and Microsoft collaborated to develop the Cg language. Microsoft calls its implementation High-Level Shading Language, or HLSL for short. HLSL and Cg are the same language but reflect the different names each company uses to identify the language and its underlying technology.""
Quote:
Additionally, since it's nVidias, would it be rational to assume that cg shaders won't work on API cards?
No, the whole point of CG is that it just works everywhere, so NVidia would be shooting themselves in the foot by forcing game developers to write two versions of all their shaders (one for NVidia cards and one for non-NVidia cards).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah I'll second the Cg/HLSL approach. There's very few cases where you would need to modify a shader to compile for one or the other, and you can usually fix it with a #define.

I've also always considered GLSL a no-go since it lacks a very fundamental feature that Cg and HLSL support: off-line compilation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alrighty - cheerio, guys! I'll go with the cg/HLSL approach as well in that case. Incidentally - something I found for GLSL enthusiasts while doing research.

One note though - I did try to pass a (pretty random) HLSL shader (off the net) to the cg compiler, but it choked on it; I didn't even try to figure out why, though, so it might've been the shader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628333
    • Total Posts
      2982127
  • Similar Content

    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
    • By Abecederia
      So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
      Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
      Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!
  • Popular Now