Sign in to follow this  
Simopi

OpenGL OpenGL & GLSL

Recommended Posts

Hi, i'm new in GLSL. After so many search about bump mapping i don't understand what is the way to have a correct rendering. Because i don't know very well how GLSL works, and the math of the normals too :P I compute normals in this way:
 Vec3f a, b;
  a = Vector3Offset(v3, v2);
  b = Vector3Offset(v1, v2);

  Vec3f normal = a^b; //cross product 
Where Vector3Offset is v3-v2 and v1-v2. Then i compute tangents and binormals. Btw it seems normals are wrong. If i understand well, gl_Normal variable (in GLSL) contains the normal. To have it, i must call:
  
glEnableVertexAttribArrayARB(2);
glVertexAttribPointerARB(2, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, 0, normalsArray); 
Is that right? Thanks for your time, and sorry for my english.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gl_Vertex, gl_Normal etc are deprecated functionality and I suggest you don't use them at all. The correct way to use glVertexAttribPointer with opengl 2.0+ would be to first extract the position of your normal attribute from the shader. Don't assume that the normal will be at a specific index as you have done here (you assume it will be at index 2, ie the third attribute in your shader).

For example, if your shader looks like this:

attribute vec4 Vertex; // Input vertex declared as "Vertex"
attribute vec3 Normal; // Input normal declared as "Normal"
varying vec3 v_normal; // output normal

void main()
{
gl_Position = Vertex; // Output untransformed vertex
v_normal = Normal; // Pass on normal to fragment shader
}



Then you would want to setup your attributepointers as such:

// This fetches the attribute indices from the shader.
// the string "Vertex" and "Normal" matches the attributes
// declared in the shader
GLint vertex_index = glGetAttribLocation(program, "Vertex");
GLint normal_index = glGetAttribLocation(program, "Normal");

// Need to calculate the stride of a complete vertex
// in this case, two float3 (24 bytes)
GLuint stride = sizeof(GLfloat)*3 + sizeof(GLfloat)*3;

glEnableVertexAttribArray(vertex_index);
glVertexAttribPointer(vertex_index, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, stride, vertexArray);

glEnableVertexAttribArray(normal_index);
glVertexAttribPointer(normal_index, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, stride, normalsArray);



Also, make sure you normalize your normals after that cross product ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@HuntsMan I use GLSL 1.5, this is the answer from the glGetString(GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION).

Thanks for the answers, i'll try to apply your suggestions and i'll post here my progress ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hard to tell. Kind of looks like your vertex indices are slightly off. If you are using indexed vertices that is.

How does your vertex layout look? And how does your drawcall look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, i try to explain my work:

i use vertex arrays to render the 3ds object. If i don't use shader, the model seems ok. The problem is when i use the shader.

OpenGL source:

I compute the normals in this way:


Vec3f triangle = obj->getShape().triangle.at(k);

//Triangle vertices
Vec3f v1 = obj->getShape().vertex.at(triangle.i1);
Vec3f v2 = obj->getShape().vertex.at(triangle.i2);
Vec3f v3 = obj->getShape().vertex.at(triangle.i3);

Vec3f a, b;
a = v3-v2;
b = v1-v2;

Vec3f normal = a^b; //cross product

//Texture coordinates
Vec2f st1 = obj->getShape().texture.at(triangle.i1);
Vec2f st2 = obj->getShape().texture.at(triangle.i2);
Vec2f st3 = obj->getShape().texture.at(triangle.i3);

Vec2f c, d;
c = st3-st2;
d = st1-st2;

float coef = 1/ (c.x * d.y - d.x * c.y);
Vec3f tangent;

tangent.x = coef * ((v1.x * d.y) + (v2.x * -c.y));
tangent.y = coef * ((v1.y * d.y) + (v2.y * -c.y));
tangent.z = coef * ((v1.z * d.y) + (v2.z * -c.y));

tangent.normalize();
normal.normalize();

Vec3f binormal = tangent^normal; //cross product






Then i put everything into an array. For example, the normal array will be:


normalArray[i++] = normal.x;
normalArray[i++] = normal.y;
normalArray[i++] = normal.z;






Then i call glNormalArray(... normalArray);

For tangents and binormals i use vertex attributes, declared into shader:


attribute vec3 tangent;






and in opengl i call glVertexAttribPointer(...);

To render the vertices:


glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, shape.triangle.size()*3, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, indexPointer);


Thanks for the patience!

[Edited by - Simopi on February 18, 2010 1:26:22 PM]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Simopi
@HuntsMan I use GLSL 1.5, this is the answer from the glGetString(GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION).

[smile][smile][smile] [grin]
HuntsMan asked you what GLSL version you're targeting, not what is the supported version!
The correct answer you can get if you find directive #version in the beginning of your shaders. If there is no #version directive, you are writing shaders for GLSL 1.1! Fortunately, NVIDIA enables mixing all versions of GLSL (as well as Cg).

Before going to further GLSL programming, I strongly recommend to read few beginning chapters from the "Orange book", or some good tutorial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628293
    • Total Posts
      2981869
  • Similar Content

    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
    • By Abecederia
      So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
      Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
      Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!
    • By test opty
      Hi,
      I'm trying to learn OpenGL through a website and have proceeded until this page of it. The output is a simple triangle. The problem is the complexity.
      I have read that page several times and tried to analyse the code but I haven't understood the code properly and completely yet. This is the code:
       
      #include <glad/glad.h> #include <GLFW/glfw3.h> #include <C:\Users\Abbasi\Desktop\std_lib_facilities_4.h> using namespace std; //****************************************************************************** void framebuffer_size_callback(GLFWwindow* window, int width, int height); void processInput(GLFWwindow *window); // settings const unsigned int SCR_WIDTH = 800; const unsigned int SCR_HEIGHT = 600; const char *vertexShaderSource = "#version 330 core\n" "layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos;\n" "void main()\n" "{\n" " gl_Position = vec4(aPos.x, aPos.y, aPos.z, 1.0);\n" "}\0"; const char *fragmentShaderSource = "#version 330 core\n" "out vec4 FragColor;\n" "void main()\n" "{\n" " FragColor = vec4(1.0f, 0.5f, 0.2f, 1.0f);\n" "}\n\0"; //******************************* int main() { // glfw: initialize and configure // ------------------------------ glfwInit(); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MAJOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MINOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_OPENGL_PROFILE, GLFW_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE); // glfw window creation GLFWwindow* window = glfwCreateWindow(SCR_WIDTH, SCR_HEIGHT, "My First Triangle", nullptr, nullptr); if (window == nullptr) { cout << "Failed to create GLFW window" << endl; glfwTerminate(); return -1; } glfwMakeContextCurrent(window); glfwSetFramebufferSizeCallback(window, framebuffer_size_callback); // glad: load all OpenGL function pointers if (!gladLoadGLLoader((GLADloadproc)glfwGetProcAddress)) { cout << "Failed to initialize GLAD" << endl; return -1; } // build and compile our shader program // vertex shader int vertexShader = glCreateShader(GL_VERTEX_SHADER); glShaderSource(vertexShader, 1, &vertexShaderSource, nullptr); glCompileShader(vertexShader); // check for shader compile errors int success; char infoLog[512]; glGetShaderiv(vertexShader, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetShaderInfoLog(vertexShader, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::VERTEX::COMPILATION_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } // fragment shader int fragmentShader = glCreateShader(GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER); glShaderSource(fragmentShader, 1, &fragmentShaderSource, nullptr); glCompileShader(fragmentShader); // check for shader compile errors glGetShaderiv(fragmentShader, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetShaderInfoLog(fragmentShader, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::FRAGMENT::COMPILATION_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } // link shaders int shaderProgram = glCreateProgram(); glAttachShader(shaderProgram, vertexShader); glAttachShader(shaderProgram, fragmentShader); glLinkProgram(shaderProgram); // check for linking errors glGetProgramiv(shaderProgram, GL_LINK_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetProgramInfoLog(shaderProgram, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::PROGRAM::LINKING_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } glDeleteShader(vertexShader); glDeleteShader(fragmentShader); // set up vertex data (and buffer(s)) and configure vertex attributes float vertices[] = { -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, // left 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, // right 0.0f, 0.5f, 0.0f // top }; unsigned int VBO, VAO; glGenVertexArrays(1, &VAO); glGenBuffers(1, &VBO); // bind the Vertex Array Object first, then bind and set vertex buffer(s), //and then configure vertex attributes(s). glBindVertexArray(VAO); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, VBO); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertices), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 3 * sizeof(float), (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); // note that this is allowed, the call to glVertexAttribPointer registered VBO // as the vertex attribute's bound vertex buffer object so afterwards we can safely unbind glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, 0); // You can unbind the VAO afterwards so other VAO calls won't accidentally // modify this VAO, but this rarely happens. Modifying other // VAOs requires a call to glBindVertexArray anyways so we generally don't unbind // VAOs (nor VBOs) when it's not directly necessary. glBindVertexArray(0); // uncomment this call to draw in wireframe polygons. //glPolygonMode(GL_FRONT_AND_BACK, GL_LINE); // render loop while (!glfwWindowShouldClose(window)) { // input // ----- processInput(window); // render // ------ glClearColor(0.2f, 0.3f, 0.3f, 1.0f); glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); // draw our first triangle glUseProgram(shaderProgram); glBindVertexArray(VAO); // seeing as we only have a single VAO there's no need to // bind it every time, but we'll do so to keep things a bit more organized glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 3); // glBindVertexArray(0); // no need to unbind it every time // glfw: swap buffers and poll IO events (keys pressed/released, mouse moved etc.) glfwSwapBuffers(window); glfwPollEvents(); } // optional: de-allocate all resources once they've outlived their purpose: glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &VAO); glDeleteBuffers(1, &VBO); // glfw: terminate, clearing all previously allocated GLFW resources. glfwTerminate(); return 0; } //************************************************** // process all input: query GLFW whether relevant keys are pressed/released // this frame and react accordingly void processInput(GLFWwindow *window) { if (glfwGetKey(window, GLFW_KEY_ESCAPE) == GLFW_PRESS) glfwSetWindowShouldClose(window, true); } //******************************************************************** // glfw: whenever the window size changed (by OS or user resize) this callback function executes void framebuffer_size_callback(GLFWwindow* window, int width, int height) { // make sure the viewport matches the new window dimensions; note that width and // height will be significantly larger than specified on retina displays. glViewport(0, 0, width, height); } As you see, about 200 lines of complicated code only for a simple triangle. 
      I don't know what parts are necessary for that output. And also, what the correct order of instructions for such an output or programs is, generally. That start point is too complex for a beginner of OpenGL like me and I don't know how to make the issue solved. What are your ideas please? What is the way to figure both the code and the whole program out correctly please?
      I wish I'd read a reference that would teach me OpenGL through a step-by-step method. 
  • Popular Now