Sign in to follow this  
Prune

OpenGL Hybrid vsync

Recommended Posts

Prune    224
From http://www.opengl.org/discussion_boards/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=196709&page=3
Quote:
Just for the record - for my personal, immediate purposes, the following setup seems to work fine :)
if( dt>24) {
  if(vsync) {
    wglSwapIntervalEXT(0);
    vsync=false;
  }
}
else if( dt<12){
  if(!vsync) {
    wglSwapIntervalEXT(1);
    vsync=true;
  }
}
SwapBuffers();
dt being the time between the start of the last render, and the start of the current - ie. one frame lag.
Is this still helpful if triple-buffering is enabled?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Palidine    1315
Quote:
Original post by Prune
Is this still helpful if triple-buffering is enabled?


Define "helpful". In your application when you try it do you have better visual results? If so, yes, if not, no.

-me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kambiz    758
What is that code supposed to?(Fixing frame rate?) And why do you think it works? Depending on the driver settings wglSwapIntervalEXT may or may not affect v-sync.
Also as end used I would not happy to see an application messing up with v-sync like that since I often want it to be enable to overcome screen tearing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think that snippet is any helpful at all, and has never been. At least, not without a lot of "ifs" and "whens".

The problem with VSYNC is that it will only allow refresh/N frames per second (so, in the case of a 60Hz refresh, it will allow for 60, 30, 20, 15, 12, 8, ... fps). On the positive side, it avoids tearing artefacts, and for many games 1/2 the refresh rate is still quite acceptable.

Now, it may happen that your rendering is a bit too slow, maybe running at just 59 fps, which would be acceptable, but due to VSYNC it will drop to 30 fps which is not acceptable (maybe in a fast-paced ego-shooter).

This code snippet tries to deal with the problem by collecting some more or less reliable data (last frame time), compare it to some hardcoded value and turn VSYNC on/off on the fly.

Here's is the first flaw already. Not only is 24 ms a really weird frame time, this corresponds to something like 42 fps -- few if any devices will have a refresh rate like this -- but also you don't really know the real refresh rate, so hardcoding it is a kind of stupid idea. Typical monitors can have refresh rates going from 50 to 120 Hz with maybe a dozen steps in between. So... 24 may be good for one particular monitor, but that's about it.
Also, different games have different fps needs, so regardless of the actual hardware, this number may not be the one you want. For a top-down strategy game, 15 fps may be perfectly acceptable. For a fast ego-shooter, 60 fps may not be enough.
Plus, measuring the frame time in a reliable and precise way is not quite trivial, either. And, whatever you measure is (obviously) after the fact. It may be better to avoid the problem in the first place.

I think the right solution here is to let the user choose. Usually I hate it when people just play the "let the user choose" card, but in this case, I think it is really justified.
Not only is this much less work and trouble, but it also is a lot more reliable. And, it accounts for the fact that different people are... well... different. Some people maybe don't mind a bit of tearing but really hate low frame rates. And then, tearing might annoy the hell out of others. You don't know.
Lastly, you don't even know if you can change VSYNC at all. Most drivers allow the user to turn VSYNC on/off globally, so whatever you do might not be good for anything after all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
szecs    2990
Quote:
Just for the record - for my personal, immediate purposes, the following setup seems to work fine :)

if( dt>24) {
if(vsync) {
wglSwapIntervalEXT(0);
vsync=false;
}
}
else if( dt<12){
if(!vsync) {
wglSwapIntervalEXT(1);
vsync=true;
}
}
SwapBuffers();


dt being the time between the start of the last render, and the start of the current - ie. one frame lag.
That is very interesting. I had the same question with no answers a few months ago, and I came out with almost the same idea, but for some reason, I could never get it to work. V-sync never got switched on, or never got switched off, no matter what values I used it the else-if conditions (I also had the two different values to introduce some kind of hysteresis), just didn't work.
So I decided to go the user selection way, and the user can switch to lower resolution, decide how many particles are drawn etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prune    224
Quote:
Original post by samoth
This code snippet tries to deal with the problem by collecting some more or less reliable data (last frame time), compare it to some hardcoded value and turn VSYNC on/off on the fly.

Of course, it is trivial to extend to some statistic measure relying on a few past frames, rather than a single frame.

Quote:
Here's is the first flaw already. Not only is 24 ms a really weird frame time, this corresponds to something like 42 fps -- few if any devices will have a refresh rate like this -- but also you don't really know the real refresh rate, so hardcoding it is a kind of stupid idea.

I am myself very curious about this choice. As I wrote in the first post, I copied this snipped from elsewhere. The following comment is one of the replies on that forum:
Quote:
Mikkel Gjoel: you are right, you snippet works very well !
This is really nice to the eye, even with black+white vertical stripes in variable high-speed horizontal scroll, my worst case as far as display refresh is concerned.
I don't get why your first threshold value works so well, but I could not get better results with a smaller value. However 85 Hz monitor would mean around 11-12 milliseconds, not 24 right ?

There was no explanation in reply though; I myself posted in the thread but got no answer of any sort.
I cannot begin to imagine the reason for the choice, whether latencies for wglSwapIntervalEXT's effect come into play, or what... I'd love to hear some suggestions. Perhaps the choice is simply empirical, but given that a different random user also found this the smallest value that made a difference, it's unlikely that the writer of the snipped had some unusual refresh rate.

Quote:
And, whatever you measure is (obviously) after the fact.

That's hardly specific to this issue. Consider a physics simulation where you're determining the delta-t. There is at least a one-frame lag, some smoothness of the dt variation over most frames is always assumed since you cannot predict discontinuous events that would cause a sudden change (since they usually result from user action or arise from system complexity). This is a general aspect of any feedback-based controller system, where the variable is not necessarily just time but could be temperature or whatever.

Quote:
I think the right solution here is to let the user choose. Usually I hate it when people just play the "let the user choose" card, but in this case, I think it is really justified.
Not only is this much less work and trouble, but it also is a lot more reliable. And, it accounts for the fact that different people are... well... different. Some people maybe don't mind a bit of tearing but really hate low frame rates. And then, tearing might annoy the hell out of others. You don't know.
Lastly, you don't even know if you can change VSYNC at all. Most drivers allow the user to turn VSYNC on/off globally, so whatever you do might not be good for anything after all.

I'm lucky to be writing for a hardware and software platform that I specify (touchscreen kiosks), which removes these concerns. But even someone without that privilege can provide the user with such an option in addition to having vsync always on or always off, maybe with even tunable threshold dt. (By the way, the NVIDIA driver lets one to force vsync on and off, but also has a setting allowing the application to select it.) So I would really like to get a bit deeper into this issue in order to get best results.

This algorithm is, as you explained, geared to prevents halving of framerate for cases where some portion of frames might exceed one refresh time. The problem of course is that those frames would appear with tearing, so it's a specific compromise between lag to next frame display and visual artifacts.
This got me into thinking about the other solution, triple buffering, which presents a different compromise--adding a lag time of an extra frame to act as a safety margin for the cases where some frames take longer than a vertical retrace. But wouldn't it make sense, in cases where the draw takes less than half of a vertical refresh, to dynamically switch to double-buffering and thus improve latency? This would be somewhat analogous to the dynamically using vsync in the snippet above, and could be combined. But how can one turn triple buffering on/off from the application, given there seems to be no WGL/GLX extension as there is for vsync? Does NVIDIA have any way to ask the driver for it programmatically? Worst case, I'd imagine one could manually handle two back buffers in the application and turn triple-buffering off in the driver...

Then there is the question of how NVIDIA's driver setting of "Maximum pre-rendered frames" affects the above considerations...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
       
      Thanks
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
       
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2120983
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
      Thanks!
  • Popular Now