Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Upgrade to Cg 2.0 problem & Texture 2D array

Recommended Posts

Hi, Recently I needed a 2d Array texture, but found out that Cg1.5 didn't support them yet. So, I downloaded Cg 2.0 and simply replaced the DLL's. The shader works now, but the framerate suddenly dropped from 33 to 23 FPS, that's about 33%! I didn't change anything else in the code, neither the (Delphi) file that links up with all the DLL functions. Unfortunately, I can't find updated Delphi headers for Cg 2.0. I could update them myself, but hey, I'm lazy, those units are pretty big! And maybe the problem is elsewhere. Does someone have any idea what it could be? Certain function calls, wrong setup, passing parameters... I'm using Delphi 7, OpenGL 1.x, Cg 2.0. He, ancient tools :) Laptop has a GeForce 9800M GTS. Using Shader model 3.0 in the Cg setup. -edit: same performance drop when using the newest Cg 2.2 release. For now I could use 3D textures instead of 2D texture array's. I need them or Cascaded Shadow Maps. Would there be any reason to use array's over 3D textures, or vice versa? Regards [Edited by - spek on February 22, 2010 3:39:19 PM]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you tried using cgGLSetDebugMode(CG_FALSE)? This will avoid the numerous glGetError calls the runtime makes internally.

Remember there's also a Cg forum at NVIDIA's developer site where many NVIDIA engineers roam, several from the Cg teams.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
That function wasn't even defined in my old header. Tried it, but no significant difference (neither with the old DLL's by the way). Guess something else is causing problems. I can't remember doing anything really special in the shaders. Maybe one thing, since I while I'm using the glState. For example:

uniform float4x4 mvp
out.pos = mul( mvp, in.pos );

out.pot = mul( glstate.matrix.mvp, in.pos );

That didn't change the speed, although compiling time suddenly became a lot longer (I have more than hundred shaders).

Thanks for pointing to that forum, although I always start with gamedev since I get the best help here ussually ;)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now