Sign in to follow this  
stella1016

OpenGL Unrecognized OpenGL version

Recommended Posts

I am using qt (+opengl) to implement a program. I need to test it on different OS. It has problem in Fedora 12 and Ubuntu 9.10. The terminal shows "Unrecognized OpenGL version", and the display is frozen. I checked the opengl version on different OS. The OSs which are working have lower opengl version. for example: OpenSUSE 10.3 32bit: server glx version string: 1.2 client glx version string: 1.4 OpenGL version string: 1.4 (2.1 Mesa 7.0.1) The OS which doesn't work: Ubuntu 9.10 32bit: server glx version string: 1.2 client glx version string: 1.4 OpenGL version string: 2.1 ( Mesa 7.6) OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20 Fedora 12 32bit: server glx version string: 1.2 client glx version string: 1.4 OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.7-devel OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20 I am thinking about the problem might be: higher opengl version doesn't support my program. Am I right? Does anyone know the solution? Thanks in advance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I found some hint in OpenGL website:
--------------
23.040 How can I code for different versions of OpenGL?

Because a feature or extension is available on the OpenGL development environment you use for building your app, it doesn't mean it will be available for use on your end user's system. Your code must avoid making feature or extension calls when those features and extensions aren't available.

When your program initializes, it must query the OpenGL library for information on the OpenGL version and available extensions, and surround version- and extension-specific code with the appropriate conditionals based on the results of that query. For example:

#include <stdlib.h> ... int gl12Supported; gl12Supported = atof(glGetString(GL_VERSION)) >= 1.2; ... if (gl12Supported) { // Use OpenGL 1.2 functionality }
--------------

What is the difference between Opengl version 1.4 and 2.1??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The main difference between them is that OpenGL 2.1 has buffer objects and shaders and is much more up-to-date. It is what most of the hardware in the wild supports, too.

It is fully backwards compatible with version 1.4 unlike the more recent versions, such as 3.3 and 4.0. Those more recent versions add features that are only found in the more recent GPUs and drop functionality which is not supported in hardware any more.
The 3.0 and 3.1 versions are "in between" as they still do support old features, but consider them deprecated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But still, I have problem with my application.

I compiled my application in OpenSUSE 10.3, and executed it in Ubuntu 9.10. The problem comes only in Ubuntu 9.10, and the difference I could find is opengl version. If opengl 2.1 is backwards compatible, I don't know why the problem comes....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That message means Qt couldn't parse the version string from OpenGL (glGetString(GL_VERSION)), probably because it's malformed, and that would be a driver bug.

You can check how that message is triggered here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are the appropriate drivers installed? What is the vendor string? Mesa appearing in the output you have posted makes me believe you are using the software rasterizer. I use Qt for my OpenGL applications on Ubuntu 9.4 and 9.10 and I had no problems with the NVidia drivers installed.

Qt seems to expects the version string to look like for example "1.4" but not like "1.4 (2.1 Mesa 7.0.1)". NVidia and ATI drivers actually return in the expected format.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, sth I missed to mention.
I am running my OS in VM.

But I tested 'real' OS of Ubuntu 9.10 as well. There I got more strange result: one account is with OpenGL version 1.4 (my app works), another account with 2.1 (my app not working). The hardware is the same. How could this happen? Install additional libs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by stella1016
With the NVidia drivers installed, my collegue's machine also works.

So the driver is a must for my app? What if on VM?


VMs have limited support for hardware accelerated graphics, VirtualBox for example has some DX/GL drivers for Windows (as guest OS).
OpenGL is an API to make use of the GPU, when no hardware acceleration is available why would you want to use OpenGL? Well, if needed there is Mesa, a software implementation (much slower than hardware). You could try making Qt parse the GL version that is returned by Mesa.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But why this differs for different version of Ubuntu (all based on VM)? Other OS doesn't have the real hardware to support, but they worked, and this Ubuntu 9.10 doesn't.

I am thinking about some init error of my app....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by stella1016
But why this differs for different version of Ubuntu (all based on VM)?

Maybe different versions of mesa. How does the version string look like when it works?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If QT has some issue, then update it or don't use it. I use SDL myself and I check the GL version myself. Gl 1.4 didn't have vbo. Then vbo was added to 1.5. 2.0 got shaders. 2.1 got pbo. I am citing that from memory. Check the docs if you want.

Why your code doesn't work on some ubuntu with 2.1... I don't know. You have the source code.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by stella1016
But I tested 'real' OS of Ubuntu 9.10 as well. There I got more strange result: one account is with OpenGL version 1.4 (my app works), another account with 2.1


Make sure both accounts are in "video" group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by EngineCoder
Quote:
Original post by stella1016
But I tested 'real' OS of Ubuntu 9.10 as well. There I got more strange result: one account is with OpenGL version 1.4 (my app works), another account with 2.1


Make sure both accounts are in "video" group.


Sorry that it take long time until I reply for you who kindly tried to help.

What do you mean "video" group? How to check this out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here I talk more details about my app.

My application uses the concept of QT modules, which means it can load detected *.dll files automatically.

I have two modules among them, module1 using QGraphicsView (no direct gl function), another module2 using QGLWidget (direct use of gl function). A flag in module1 is read from a file to decide whether using OpenGL to accelerate rendering (not sure, done by other people). My module2 is the module having problem.

In normal OS system, no matter the flag is 0 or 1, display has no problem.

In Ubuntu 9.10, if the flag is 0, module1 is working, module2 not; if the flag is 1, module1 is not working, module2 works.

There is only on command differency in module1 for the flag on or off:
if(b_opengl_monitor)
{
this->setViewport(new QGLWidget());
}

"this" inherits class QGraphicsView.

Now I am confused, why this flag effects my module2???


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627740
    • Total Posts
      2978884
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now