Sign in to follow this  
RexHunter99

OpenGL Checking Capabilities of end-user's machine

Recommended Posts

I'm running through the capabilities of the end-users machine, most importantly the OpenGL version and GLSL version. I did some searching on the forums but I couldn't find my answer so I guess a new topic won't hurt (and might help others in my position) Okay so I'm getting the Version of GL and the GLSL Version via glGetString() and GL_VERSION, GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION. Now I use atof() to grab the decimal version of OpenGL and store it in a variable known as OpenGLVersion (on my machine, I have OpenGL 2.1.2, so OpenGLVersion is set to 2.1) Now I know for my graphic card, which is an add-on AGP 8x nVidia GeForce 6200A that I have GLSL 1.20 nVidia CG, but what if someone who loads up the game does not have GLSL support? What will GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION return? I'd at first assumed it'd return no floating-point number version... but I'm not sure and I don't want to cause problems during load-time, nor do I have a machine that I have access to that does not have hardware support for at least GLSL 1.20 or GL version 2.1 So to define the question, what will GLSL's version return be if the hardware does not support GLSL? Also, if the hardware has an OpenGL version lower than GLSL supports, do I not check for GLSL support?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can try your code in a virtual machine. Download Virtual Box or VMWare Player and grab an iso of Windows (you can have demo version too). So you can try on Windows and Linux easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A Virtual machine is not the answer I'm looking for, I need to know this information as soon as a player boots up the game.

Another question is, how can I check if the stencil buffer is supported on the hardware exactly? (or at least the implementation of OpenGL being used) glEnable() only returns an error if the data we pass it isn't a GL cap, or of it was executed between glBegin() and glEnd(). Will it work if I do the following:

bool StencilBuffer = false;

glEnable(GL_STENCIL_TEST);

if (glIsEnabled(GL_STENCIL_TEST))
StencilBuffer = true;



Because I'd assume that if the Stencil buffer isn't supported, then enabling it will fail, so glIsEnabled() wouldn't return true, well I'm assuming at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
See the following page: glGetString. Under notes there is the following information:
Quote:
The client and server may support different versions or extensions.

glGetString always returns a compatible version number or list of extensions. The release number always describes the server.

GL_SHADING_LANGUAGE_VERSION is available only if the GL version is 2.0 or greater.


So you would first get the version, and then see if it's larger than 2.0, and then check the shading language version. You can also check the extensions string for many features, for example GL_ARB_vertex_shader.

To check for a stencil buffer, I think that's platform specific, and covered in the setup of OpenGL. For example on Windows it depends on the pixel format you choose, and can be checked from there. Stencil testing without a stencil buffer will just fail silently.. the documentation for glStencilFunc has the following notes:
Quote:
If there is no stencil buffer, no stencil modification can occur and it is as if the stencil test always passes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
So you would first get the version, and then see if it's larger than 2.0, and then check the shading language version. You can also check the extensions string for many features, for example GL_ARB_vertex_shader.

Ah yes I already have added that into my CheckCaps() function ;) I previously knew about the method of checking for extensions but thanks anyway :)

Quote:
To check for a stencil buffer, I think that's platform specific, and covered in the setup of OpenGL. For example on Windows it depends on the pixel format you choose, and can be checked from there. Stencil testing without a stencil buffer will just fail silently...

(Note I'm speaking as if I am only supporting a Windows version of my game application) So I create need to check for a pixel format that has all the existing pixel format data I've specified AND for a stencil buffer? I'd assume I'll use DescribePixelFormat() for that, just iterate through the pixel formats until either I find one that fits what I want, or until it's gone through them all and found none that support a Stencil buffer, then I just check to see if I can use a pixel format that has no Stencil Buffer correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could try getting number of bits per pixel in stencil buffer:
glGetIntegerv(GL_STENCIL_BITS, &value);

If it is 0, then you have no stencil buffer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      627746
    • Total Posts
      2978905
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      -Questions
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now