# Sweeping 3D SAT Theorem?

This topic is 3053 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

Well, I'm getting the basic idea of making a new object out of the origin and the moved position of the object but when it comes to there response part I'm a bit confused. For example lets say (2D example) [ ] = Box Origin ___ <- Polygon [ ] = Box End Point Result from SAT theorem... -->[|] ___ | -->[|] [Box Moves to the right following the shorting axis.] Ther result I want, is this... [ ] [ ] ___ [Box Moves the shortest distance along the velocity vector] It feels like I'm missing something simple. Any idea what it is? I was tempted to think you just use the velocity vector but that seems like it could give incorrect results in 3D. [Edited by - AntiGuy on March 14, 2010 2:16:37 PM]

##### Share on other sites
Well wasn't really as simple as I thought but I'm happy with the result. It seems sliding the result along the polygon plane to the nearest point on the line of the velocity vector works.

Probably needs a few more tweaks but that solves it for the most part.

Update: Scratch that, doesn't work

[Edited by - AntiGuy on May 13, 2010 1:08:25 AM]

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
Rutin
16
4. 4
5. 5

• 10
• 14
• 30
• 13
• 11
• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
631788
• Total Posts
3002356
×