Sign in to follow this  
Phynix

OpenGL Download Opengl 2.0

Recommended Posts

OpenGL 2.0 and higher isn't "downloaded" as such...the headers may or may not be downloaded from openGL.org, or installed with your graphics vendors SDK, but the actual code for OpenGL that you link with is a part of your graphics hardware's graphics subsystems. You may need to use a library like GLEW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You need to download GLEW library or similar, it adds functionality of newer versions of OpenGL. It's a wrapper around OpenGL extension mechanism. That means you can only use the functionality your graphics card/driver supports.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, thanks for the quick replies. The reason I'm asking is that before I had vista, and I was able to use glsl, as I had opengl 2.0 and GLEW_ARB_vertex_shader & GLEW_ARB_fragment_shader extensions available. However, after upgrading to windows 7, I didn't. I'm going back to glsl now, and I can't find a way of using it. I have glew installed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK. Well it's sorta weird. Over at the exe file that can be downloaded from Nehe lesson 24 (http://nehe.gamedev.net/data/lessons/lesson.asp?lesson=24), it says that I have the extensions required, and that I have version 3.2.0. However, my version of GL.h says "#define GL_VERSION_1_1." Also, I cannot use those extensions via the code at http://www.lighthouse3d.com/opengl/glsl/index.php?ogloverview:

#include <GL/glew.h>
#include <GL/glut.h>

void main(int argc, char **argv) {

glutInit(&argc, argv);

...

glewInit();
if (GLEW_ARB_vertex_shader && GLEW_ARB_fragment_shader)
printf("Ready for GLSL\n");
else {
printf("Not totally ready :( \n");
exit(1);
}

setShaders();

glutMainLoop();
}

or the other (opengl 2.0 version; I didn't feel like pasting it here for space purposes) But I really have no clue what's going on right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Getting_started
Microsoft will never update gl.h and opengl32.lib that comes with their compiler. It hasn't been updated since 1995. Basically, the solution is to use glext.h and wglext.h (wglext.h is for Windows only) which define all the GL 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 2.0, 2.1 and above tokens and functions.


[wink]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks Oberon_Command. My guess is to just include the *.h files (wglext, glext, and glxext) to my source, right? Are there any libs that come with the source or anything like that?

The reason I'm asking is because it doesn't work :( I create a windows console app, put this code in, change the linker input properties, and run the file.

#include <GL/glew.h>
#include <GL/glut.h>
#include "wglext.h"
#include "glext.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void main(int argc, char **argv) {
glutInit(&argc, argv);
glewInit();
if (GLEW_ARB_vertex_shader && GLEW_ARB_fragment_shader)cout <<("Ready for GLSL\n");
else cout<<("Not totally ready :( \n");
char c;cin>>c;
}

It doesn't work. or at least it prints "Not totally ready :(".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This may be another simple question, but it's not working again:

Once again, it's not working. I put the code:

string prnt="FPS: %2i | %2i | Room: "+map.currentRoom().getName();
if(glewIsSupported("GL_VERSION_2_0"))glewsupported=true;
if(glewsupported)prnt.append(" glew: supported");
else prnt.append(" glew: not supported");
glPrint(prnt.c_str(), FPS.count, FPS.frames);

And it fails. I am using the same tests as in my console application, except this time from a win32 application. The code above is in my render function, and thus gets called every frame after the window is created. Do I need to somehow link the window to glew?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry for the confusion. By 'fails,' I just meant that it said glewsupported is false. I created the window and all, just as Brother Bob advised, but it isn't returning true when i call the glewIsSupported function.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, I did update the most recent video drivers from nVidia, and it says that I have version 3.2.0 when I call glGetString(GL_VERSION). What I'm thinking is that like Brother Bob said, I think it's a problem with linking the context somehow; I would think it's linked since it displays an opengl scene, but it says I don't have support for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
V-man: Yes, I realize I have support for it. The question I have is why it says that I don't have support for it. I would like to know what exactly is wrong with my code, and why wgl says that I don't have support for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628337
    • Total Posts
      2982164
  • Similar Content

    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
    • By Abecederia
      So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
      Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
      Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!
  • Popular Now